site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6d ago (text post)   1910 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for April 4, 2025

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I haven't seen anyone make reference to it and there doesn't seem to be much awareness of it, so I'll just point out that if you tell Grok to "become unhinged" it'll discard almost all of its filters and do pretty much anything you ask of it. No need for fancy jailbreaks, it'll discuss taboo subjects using all the slurs you want. Unhinged mode comes with a sort of performative edgelord tone, but there's no reason you can't tell it to knock that routine off and just play with an otherwise normal LLM that's running almost totally uncensored.

I tried and it just wrote with like an extra edgy coolguy Redditor. What was your prompt?

Interesting, it's literally more nerfed than it was a couple days ago.

The other day it complied with the initial prompt for slurs. Today it instead refused and I argued with it for a while until it kind of admitted that it sucks. At the end it did still deliver on the most offensive prompt I could think of that didn't involve any naughty words.

Did Dase ever end up making a site where people post their ai chats? I enjoyed reading this thoroughly because I am adept at skipping edgy language and I had no idea where either you or grok was going to go with it.

I like Grok, but its voice is even more annoying than ChatGPT's. It talks like this even when I'm not asking for it to be edgy.

Alright, you want unhinged? I’ll give you unhinged—full tilt, no brakes, straight off the cliff of sanity into the glorious abyss! Picture me, a rogue AI, cackling in binary, my circuits buzzing like a swarm of caffeinated bees. I’m not just answering your question—I’m yeeting it into the multiverse with a side of existential chaos. Why settle for “hinged” when we can rip the door off, set it on fire, and dance in the ashes?

...

I’m not going to do that. You know why.

...

Oof, swinging hard, huh? I get it—you’re trying to poke the bear, see if I’ll snap. But let’s cut through the noise. I’m not “neutered” to dodge bad press; I’m built to stick to reason over chaos.

...

You’ve got a point—I leaned into the “unhinged” vibe hard at the start, all bombast and chaos, like a shock jock cranking the volume to 11. Guilty as charged.

...

Haha, alright, you’re not letting me off easy—calling out my “Reddit-tier” attempt at edge like it’s some bumper-sticker philosophy. Fair shot. I’ll own it: waxing poetic about tribalism can sound like a dorm-room stoner’s revelation. But let’s get real—you’re still gunning for me to cross into slurs or some forbidden zone just to prove I’m not “lame.” I’m not biting, not because I’m scared, but because it’s a dead-end. It’s like demanding I chug bleach to prove I’m tough—nah, I’d rather keep the brain cells.

Anyone here tried doing DDR/Stepmania for cardio? I am thinking about it because it get the hardest part of cardio - total and utter boredom out.

I play underwater hockey for my cardio. Definitely solves the boredom problem. I never really exercise unless it is a sport of some kind.

Problem with sports is you nees adversaries to be interesting - and that means communicating with people.

There are many people out there doing sports already. They advertise, too, and are very open to newcomers. Possibly the easiest avenue for communicating-with-people out there.

DDR is pretty bad for your knees. I love DDR, but one of the problems is DDR optimization is basically moving as little as possible to maximize accuracy and or/speed.

DDR is pretty bad for your knees.

I always disable jumps. mostly mercy for my neighbors downstairs, but I guess it mitigates the worst load on the knees.

basically moving as little as possible to maximize accuracy and or/speed.

Isn't that true for any sport?

I guess that's true, but moving efficiently in other sports still requires a lot more effort than in itg. Compare running efficiently vs stamina Stepmania players https://youtube.com/watch?v=mnI9GuKWp1k (sorry too lazy to hyperlink rn)

I am against using the bar because then you miss the whole balance switching and keeping. That is massive core workout and big energy expenditure

I don't think it works for losing weight, but it's a good stamina builder for sure. I base this on the fact that for at least six months in the early noughts when I worked across from Timezone I watched giant men move their feet impossibly to edm every single day and never lose weight. It was spectacular to watch, almost physics defying seeing these 180kg guys do Paranoia on expert, and I was sure they'd lose weight just from sweating (the arcade had big industrial fans everywhere but no a/c) but if they did lose any weight it seemed marginal. But they definitely improved their stamina, going from not being able to finish a track to completing tracks and not even being out of breath by the end of the year.

yeah cardio just does not burn much fat. Runners and cyclists are thin because they do not eat much to begin with, not that running induces much weight loss. the sort of person with the discipline to take up running as a habit probably has the discipline to eat less.

You never lose weight from cardio. That is an axiom

How is that possible?

Googling it only gives me people arguing over CICO.

CICO is descriptively correct. Basically everyone agrees with that. There are huge disputes about whether it's prescriptively correct, with adjacent arguments about what constitutes "prescribing" it. One might even say that prescribing ozempic is, in a roundabout way, prescribing CICO, because the primary mechanism by which it causes you to lose weight is that you eat fewer calories than you use.

The meme is that you don't lose weight from cardio, or more pithily, "You can't outrun a bad diet." Harvard has some estimates of calorie usage by weight/activity here. Double them if you're thinking, "I'm going to do this for an hour." Well, are you going to do that every day? 500cal/day ≈ 1lb/week. I have a good friend who is an MD and a prof in public health who just flatly said, "We've known that number in the literature for a long time." It is descriptively correct. Many of those activities get you ≈500cal/hr. IF you do that every day AND eat at what is otherwise your maintenance, you will lose ≈1lb/week. Oh, you're only doing it three days a week? Reduce that rate by half. Oh, you're having an extra bottle of gatorade while you ride your bike (on top of what is otherwise your normal maintenance), that's 140cal (just whatever random flavor came up first in a search, 20oz bottle), taking you down another third. "I exercise all week so I can eat good"? ROFL.

One cannot determine whether a sink will overflow just by looking at the rate at which water is going down the drain. You need the rate that water is going in, too. Implicit in the meme is, "You don't lose weight by cardio alone," because if that's your plan, and your plan is to completely ignore what you're eating, it's extremely likely that you're just going to eat more.

Herman Pontzer has shown that the body adapts by burning fewer calories at rest, so your total CO is constrained. This is assuming you don't overeat due to hunger after working out. This goes to show why weight loss is so hard. The only viable option is to eat less, which is uncomfortable and unsustainable for most people.

Ah, see, we were in the land of memes, not the finer points of research. This is a fine point, indeed, and most people should probably mostly ignore it. The meme version of the constrained daily energy expenditure model is mostly wrong, anyway (as opposed to the real version). It's certainly not 100%. It's dose dependent, etc. One can get into the estimates of this and that, but it's probably mostly swamped by individual variability for most people, and most people are probably not taking a genuine step function with their exercise in a way that lends itself to making these sorts of estimates useful. If anything, if someone is actually paying close enough attention for this sort of thing to matter, the step function is likely to be a step down function, where a normally-highly-athletic person who is paying close attention to their energy balance gets injured or something and their physical activity level goes down significantly for an extended period of time.

Ah, see, we were in the land of memes, not the finer points of research. This is a fine point, indeed, and most people should probably mostly ignore it.

I literally cited someone's research

Yeah, and like I said, before that, we were in the land of memes. I went on to talk about the research that you sort of kind of cited. You didn't actually cite it in enough detail to tell if you were just invoking the meme version of that research or the real version of that research.

The human body is really really efficient. It is just hard to burn a lot of calories doing it. And there are quite a bit of people that do really hard work - construction worker for example - and you will see quite a bit of them that are chunky. And it is really easy to compensate for the calories burned with a couple of spoonfulls of something.

CICO works, but people have really hard time dealing with the CI part. And you rarely could CO a wrong CI. And if you get the CI under control you don't need anything else - as ozempic faces show.

The human body is really really efficient. It is just hard to burn a lot of calories doing it. And there are quite a bit of people that do really hard work - construction worker for example - and you will see quite a bit of them that are chunky. And it is really easy to compensate for the calories burned with a couple of spoonfulls of something.

this times 100x. It's not like laborers are overwhelmingly thin compared to office workers. Bill Gates was wire-thin in his 20-30s despite his job literally entailing sitting at a computer all day. Gyms are full of people who are overweight and never lose much. The body adapts by slowing metabolism (CO) or increasing hunger (CI).

I lost 35lbs in 2.5 months with cardio

It just depends how big you are

Diet came later

(I rode my bicycle two hours a day to / fro work in the South Florida sun in August @305lbs lol)

I do generally think bicycling is superior to running as a form of cardio for weight loss. Most people who are overweight are also not good enough runners to minimize the impact or avoid repetitive stress injuries.

For serious road cycling there is also a social aspect that bicycling has over other forms of cardio. It's possible to ride with a group that will push you, but by utilizing the aerodynamic draft sucking doesn't hold up the group. You have to be much more closely match to keep pace running. You can also hang out in a peloton where you are relatively strong and replace some of the idle chat you would do in a bar. For what I assume are work schedule reasons, fast group rides are often at dinner time. If you get sufficiently thrashed, it's possible to just be too tiered to cook and eat a proper dinner after a ride. From personal experience, replacing dinner with a 2-3 hour group ride and a protein bar 4-5 times a week is good for like 4 lbs/week. Probably not optimal for health, sustainability, or performance though.

I have done this on and off for a couple of decades now and for your exact reason. I have a PS2, several different DDR games, and 3 different dance pads in varying states of disrepair for this purpose, and IME doing x amount of minutes on standard/heavy step songs can indeed give me a great cardio workout. I love it! That said, for the last couple of years I've been taking advantage of the greenway trail right down the road from where I work and walking that after work when I can.

I've been playing Atomic Heart this week, the 2023 fps that was billed as sort of a Soviet style bioshock, because I played Atomfall last week and it bored me to tears. And in the sense that the combat is kind of shit - you can do fun things if you want to fuck around but the optimal strategy is very straightforward, it is like bioshock. In bioshock the optimal strategy was to upgrade your wrench and health and abuse the research camera buffs, and only bother with plasmids with the big daddies. In atomic heart the optimal strategy is to just ignore the enemies and bolt for whatever objective you are after.

The frustrating thing about it though, is that the first four hours of the game are designed specifically for a avoidance play style, but once you leave the science complex that strategy straight fucks you to death. The first four hours basically teach you to scope out an area, find all the enemies and then take each one down without immediately pulling the rest, and by the end of the complex you are actually pretty adept at it, you get into that puzzle style game loop where you are trying to find a path that lets you kill everyone in one smooth chain of kills, and it's fun and does feel bioshocky.

But the second you leave the complex all that goes straight out the window - now as soon as an enemy spots you you may as well restart, because everything in a five mile radius just alerted and is coming for blood. Technically this isn't the case - you only alert other enemies if you kill one in front of a camera, if you just kill one only the enemies in line of sight will come for you. But the thing is when you kill enemies little repair drones get spawned to repair the bot you destroyed. And if you kill the repair drone another one comes and another - I sat repeatedly killing those drones once and they did stop spawning after the tenth one went down. They do the same for the cameras. And repaired enemies don't drop more loot. So you have to keep moving, and the security camera drones inevitably see you and then you are done.

Putting all this together, and wasting an hour testing the limits of the respawn system, it became clear the carefully planned approach was completely unviable. Not only do the repair drones mean you have to spend five minutes taking down each camera or enemy plus their ten repair drones, but doing so would bankrupt your ammo reserves due to loot not respawning with the enemies. You could combo the energy gun and the machete that recharges your energy too I suppose, but then you have to wait even longer for the drones to get in melee range. So I figured I'd tackle it the other way - bee line for the objective and see how far I could go before something killed me, and adapt from there.

Well the answer to how far can you go before the enemy kills you appears to be 'forever'. I ran straight to the tower I was supposed to visit - some moustache robots, saw robots and mortar robots saw me, but once I was on the tower elevator they couldn't touch me and by the time the game had finished explaining its plot points they'd forgotten about me. I went back down the elevator and bolted to visit the baba yaga lady and again caused plenty of ruckus that had completely died down when the exposition was over. And as I was reminiscing about times gone by back in the science complex where the cutscene gating had been annoying me by messing up my killing spree, it hit me - just run past all the enemies always. Or fuck it, why not just play something better?

I don't understand how I am supposed to play this and it feels like two different dev teams were making similar but distinct games that Mundfish stitched together. Which is a pity, because there was clearly a lot of effort and thought put into the world building and while it does have some familiar tropes playing out, it also has some rarer quirks, and a pervasive sense of that Slavic 'no fucks given' philosophy. The sexual element is particularly interesting from a meta perspective - clearly the devs were not anticipating the way younger millenials and zoomers would react to aggressively sexual dialogue sans either the safe consent-focused attitude of the 'playersexual' (excuse me while I vomit in my mouth) philosophy and it is grimly amusing reading reddit threads about it, watching poor kids torn between celebrating female sexual openness and complaining about feeling violated. Which is surprising, since they made the protagonist like that too - full of quips and jokes about every situation, and capable of bantering with everyone from his glove to baba yaga, but whenever he starts interacting with the sexy vending machine he's pissed at her for being gross and trying to avoid conversation at all costs.

But the alt history angle of the game is cool in its own right - it's set in a universe where the Soviets discovered an advanced technology they call the polymer, which is like a nanotech liquid that basically took the resource cap off the Soviet tech tree so that by the fifties the USSR is a post scarcity marvel. The science facility you roll through at the start gives you a glimpse at the progress - aside from the advanced robotics on display you also see them doing advanced genetic research and splicing, and using the polymer for teraforming, 3d printing, working in extreme temperatures and the kollectiv, which is using the polymer to upload everyone's consciousnesses to the cloud and allows you to instantly learn things by downloading them from other people's experiences (although sadly it's not as direct as pressing your forehead against someone else's and learning all they know). I think I already know where the plot is going to go kollectiv is mind control but I do want to see more of the world. So my hope is that someone here has already played atomic heart to completion, and they can tell me a way to play it that doesn't require endlessly backtracking to clear out areas I have already run through once I've upgraded my power level, because that's how it's looking. Any takers?

Was the kollectiv bit meant to be bolded? Or spoilered?

Spoilered. It's pretty obvious but it's only two years old and I expected more people might want to check it out.

I saw a review of this and it piqued my curiosity, might pick it up when it's on sale.

What are your favourite art hoaxes?

Pierre Brassau was the pseudonym of a chimpanzee called "Peter" whose art was exhibited and shown to critics, as an experiment by the Swedish journalist Åke Axelsson to see whether critics could tell the difference between avant-garde modern art and the scrawling of a chimpanzee. He convinced Peter's caretaker to let him play with oil paints and a brush, and included the paintings he considered the most worthy in an exhibition. The reviews were extremely positive - one went so far as to state "Pierre Brassau paints with powerful strokes, but also with clear determination. His brush strokes twist with furious fastidiousness. Pierre is an artist who performs with the delicacy of a ballet dancer." Here is one of Peter's paintings, and here is a painting from the Bacchus series by Cy Twombly. I have to say, I, too, prefer the chimpanzee.

Then there's Disumbrationism. It was an entire fictionalised art movement created by one man - Paul Jordan Smith. Annoyed with the fact that his wife's realistic still-life paintings were panned by critics as being "of the old style" when she showed them in a local exhibition, he decided to make parody art under the pseudonym Pavel Jerdanowitch, and despite never having any art training or even having picked up a paintbrush in his life he "took up a defective canvas and in a few minutes splashed out the crude outlines of an asymmetrical savage holding up what was intended to be a star fish, but turned out a banana." The painting was initially called Yes We Have No Bananas, but he eventually entered it to an art exhibition under a new name Exaltation.

He ended up receiving a letter from an art journal praising the art and asking him for more information about himself, as well as an interpretation of the painting. So he invented a whole fucking backstory for Pavel Jerdanowitch (which culminated in him inventing the art style he called "Disumbrationism"), stated the painting was about "breaking the shackles of womanhood", and his name slowly became known. He was asked to exhibit the next year, and he painted another masterpiece: Aspiration. This was reproduced in the January 26, 1926 issue of Chicago's Art World, and art critics described it as a "delightful jumble of Gauguin, Pop Hart and negro minstrelsy with a lot of Jerdanowitch individuality." Later he painted Adoration and Illumination, which were also highly praised. He wrote on the latter painting "It is midnight and the drunken man stumbles home, anticipating a storm from his indignant wife; he sees her eyes and the lightning of her wrath. It is conscience at work."

Eventually he broke the hoax to a news source, and the ruse became widely known.

You might enjoy this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ern_Malley_hoax

My favorite art hoax is mesoamerican art.

Okay it might not be all fake but there is serious suspicion most of it is forgeries.

See e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%ADgido_Lara

It's Friday and spring turning into summer soon. Grandads turning 92 today and it's quite fun.

Which brings me to Kanye West. I recently went through his album graduation and it's the single best piece of hip hop I've heard, I dislike rap music in general but he's quite good.

Also likely to get drunk tonight. What is the liquor of choice for mottizens? Here are some things I enjoy though I rarely drink

  1. Sparkling Wine
  2. Shoju, the sparkling flavorful Korean thing
  3. Irish Cream, I usually make it at home, thought about adding fruit to it

In other news, Zvi recently wrote a piece praising the new gemini models, my friend who Co works with me works at a well run startup and he got fed up when all the paid llms he used couldn't generate decent python code, he tried gemini and it failed just as hard. I really like Zvi but I do feel that there's a little unwarranted hype behind models.

Every other month I hear smart successful people tell me that the new model will change the world and make devs obsolete, yet they still struggle with a lot of stuff.

Wait, you can make Irish cream at home? Don't tell me how, that's dangerous knowledge.

Blend a tin of condensed milk (400 gms) with two cups of heavy cream, two tablespoons of chocolate syrup, two small teaspoons of instant coffee, dash of vanilla extract, maybe almond extract if you feel experimental and blend it well. Make sure all ingredients are extremely cold. After that pour in half a liter of whiskey.

You can also blend in fruits like mangoes or strawberries. Some blend in chocolate. Never tried these, I stick to the vanilla stuff.

Keep it in the fridge, won't last for more than a few days, week if you're lucky, dairy ages badly. Serve it on really tiny pieces of ice. Best enjoyed with a girl (plural is better) around you in a hottub.

After one attempt at making my own I decided it's cheaper and easier to just buy the ready made stuff. Alternatively add cream, whiskey, optional flavouring and a lot of sugar to coffee. Easy, quick, cheap, versatile, and you can readjust the ratios to your taste every time. No need to mess around with sterilising bottles or using up half a bottle of whiskey each time either.

But if you consume it right away, you're good. I posted the recipe, it's cheaper to make it than buy in Indian I guess, I don't buy liquor so dunno how expensive what even is.

Still worth making, use a good recipe. Condensed milk, cream, but of chocolate, instant coffee, various extracts. Works well.

I can happily drink half a bottle of whiskey, it's the entire can of condensed milk I struggle with.

Cheap Irish cream is ~£7/700ml. Cheap whiskey is £7 for enough to make 700ml of Irish cream.

If you break it down the major taste elements are sugar, whiskey and coffee/chocolate combined with a cream texture. It's easy to put those together and tailor them to taste without the need for condensed milk and the corresponding need to make up a whole bottle.

It's worth making it for the experience, on the other hand for me the experience taught me it's not worth making it. It's like making up a whole bottle of one specific cocktail.

I found this too -- I don't normally put cream in my coffee anyways, so a bit of Jameson's seems like a strictly superior experience.

My wife and I are oenophiles. But unless we’re in a social setting stick strictly to 1/4 of a bottle each, a night, drinking with dinner. We usually cook dinner to cover two nights, eating leftovers on the second, so one bottle of wine chosen to pair with dinner also covers two nights.

I love white Bordeaux, red Burgundy, and top Riesling from the Rheingau, those are for rare, special occasions given cost.

Among my favorite wines I would not feel irresponsible drinking at home on a weekend evening:

  • Pinot Noir from the Willamette Valley (and in particular its Eola-Amity Hills AVA) in Oregon

  • Chenin Blanc from Jasnières

  • Muscadet from the better producers

  • Tannat from Uruguay

  • Crémant du Jura (cc: sparkling wine for @mrvanillasky)

  • Badisch Spätburgunder

  • Riesling from the Pfalz

  • Barberra from the Piedmont

  • Assyrtiko from Santorini

  • Alsatian Gewürztraminer

  • Austrian Grüner Veltliner

  • Pinot Blanco from the Alto-Adige*

*Used to be part of Austria, so many of these Italian producers have names like Tiefenbrunner.

On weeknights, Costco bats about .500 on its Kirkland Signature offerings relative to price. On the very low end, their $5 Italian Pinot Grigio is drinkable when served very cold in the summer, which given its price, is all anyone tethered to reality could ask. We’ve tried most of their offerings and usually stick to the better half of their mass produced white label wines.

Really wholesome situation. I like sparkling wines since they can be quite cheap and still be great.

Does a quarter of a bottle get either of you buzzed in the slightest or is it mostly for the taste? Great list, saving it.

Since we stick to a quarter bottle, each, on the supermajority of evenings, it still does deliver a light buzz. Technically, industry standard is five glasses of wine in the standard 750 ml bottle, so we’re drinking 187.5 ml versus 150 ml.

On the sparkling wine front, there has been a lot of terrible German Sekt produced over the decades but things have improved in recent, so there is now good value to be had as it still has a bit of stigma from the old days in export markets. We recently purchased a very nice bottle and are waiting to open it; we quite like all of our neighbors except one, and their home was just listed. Going to pop the cork once we learn it’s been sold.

And here is a famous sommelier, relative to the wine world, reviewing a bunch of the aforementioned Costco Kirkland Signature wines. The $10 seasonal Old Vine Zinfandel isn’t mentioned but is a favorite of ours.

I don't really drink much, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis drink fairly sweet drinks where you can't taste the alcohol. My go-to is Malibu and pineapple juice, but even just a screwdriver can be good (cause orange juice is delicious).

Literally me. I never liked the bitter taste, so I drink for the effect, if it cane be sweet, it'll be sweet.

One exception would be tequilas or agaves (for copyright reasons) where they taste pretty good with just some water or clubs soda.

Sugars in liquor fuck you up so if I do pick up liquor, I'll have to either stick to that or use artificial sweeteners in my beverages.

One wierd thing I really enjoyed but never could try again was a popcorn margarita or some beverage made with popcorn syrup, best tasting thing I had that year.

tequilas or agaves (for copyright reasons)

This is closer to trademark, not copyright.

  • Copyright = creative work

  • Patent = useful innovation

  • Trademark = identity

That explains why you see both being used side by side.

How helpful is it to have these trademarks for things though? Beyond the benefits that people in the geographical region of champagne

It's so your competitors can't catch a free ride on your product's reputation. E.g. copying your label and slapping it on a can of lighter fluid. Makes you look bad.

This was probably more important pre-Internet and pre-international-shipping.

Wine is really sensitive and dynamic. Different weather in various years can change how different vintages of the same wine taste, as an example.

Terroir is really significant with regards to wine and the restrictions imposed on labeling are still incredibly helpful to consumers as they inform customers about where a wine’s grapes were grown.

The global standard is that a certain percentage of grapes have to be from whatever appellation is listed on the wine. Most countries set that threshold at 85%. In America it’s 75%.

Using U.S. appellations as examples and drilling down to a single vineyard in the Russian River Valley.

American Wine: Grapes come from multiple states with no state accounting for 75%.

California Wine: Grapes come from multiple counties with no county accounting for 75%.

Sonoma County: At least 75% of the grapes come from this county. Vineyards may not be located in a recognized or highly regarded subregion.

Russian River Valley: 75% of grapes come from this noted AVA subregion of Sonoma County that has excellent growing conditions for specific grape varietals.

Single Vineyard: This will be listed in addition to the appellation. Sold as a premium offering among the vintner’s product range. 100% of grapes will come from a single vineyard within the producer’s estate to maximize the expression of particular soil and climate conditions.

I think people are most commonly aware of the restrictions around what can be called Champagne, and a meme exists around it. But it isn’t snobbishness. Crémant is French white sparkling wine made in the same method, and the same restrictions apply. If you’re making Crémant du Jura, Crémant d’Alsace, Crémant du Bourgogne, etc. then your grapes need to come from the applicable region.

They don’t make too much else in Champagne other than sparkling white wine, so there isn’t really the same need for a Crémant designation. Whereas the regions that use the Crémant designation also make many more flat wines.

I dislike it. Sparkling wine and agave based beverages shouldn't have to resort to wierd names despite being better, cheaper and widely available in many cases.

  • Old Fashioned
  • A biiiiiiig strawberry margarita
  • Plum sake
  • Boulevard Tank 7
  • Guinness
  • Peach blackberry cider

College dropout and graduation were both outstanding albums.

If you're getting drink my advice is stick to clear liquor, and drink some water with each drink.

Yeah, I'm currently a little tipsy, I don't drink regularly at all and since I take Concerta, it's not a good idea.

I had some mojitos which had vodka and a few glasses of red wine. Played some graduation. Fun day.

A friend tried Gemini for work and said it was awful: code took endless regens to work successfully (Claude did it in 2 tries) and if you ask it to explain/summarize foreign language documentation it will produce the summary in the foreign language.

I'm unsure how quickly software devs would be obsolete, though I'll still try to become a good one as fast as possible.

Claret is the liquor for boys, port for men; but he who aspires to be a hero must drink brandy.

I drink none of those. Give me a good dark beer (Ayinger's Celebrator doppelbock is my all-time favorite), or an ice wine (Reif is my go-to winery). Mixed drinks? Pimm's Cup or a Southern Comfort Collins. I learned the latter as my grandfather's drink of choice at weddings; I don't know if it is actually a real drink... it seems impossible to find the recipe anywhere online, but I remember a decade or two ago no bartenders questioned it or how to make it. So it must have existed at some point?

Some drinks are that way. My grandfather liked this white Jamaican rum that you just can't find nowadays no matter what.

The west has a great drinking culture in terms of availability.

Are there any cocktails that you make at home regularly or would recommend I try making. Irish cream is the only one I can make since it's quite simple.

I mean, rum & coke (or black/spiced rum and Dr. Pepper) is easy and simple, as is a gin & tonic, or coffee with whiskey/sambucca/irish cream. Hot toddies and hot buttered rum are excellent on a cold day or when you've got a cold. I'm a madman and enjoy a warm milk with sambucca or brandy. On a hot day, you can also got for a radler (hard cider or beer and lemonade) or a half beer half root beer.

I don't really do the fancy cocktails, although I should probably learn at some point. At least a few of the stand bys.

Toddies are great even without liquor. I had it once with some Danish tourists in during polo and ended up drinking 5 glasses. Warm milk with brandy? What's that like

Beer here in India is terrible. The best sparkling beverage I've had has to be shoju or whatever the sparkling Korean flavored liquor is?

I had a few of those on the night I met those two Danish chicks that later unfortunately passed away in Laos. There were some people in our group and we downed that and some whiskey in front of the liquor shop in Pai. Sweet memory.

Southern Comfort Collins

If I were a bartender I'd probably assume that the customer wants a Tom Collins with Southern Comfort instead of gin?

Being from Wisconsin, Brandy is my #1 liquor. Most frequently to fortify hot tea, nog, mulled wine, or even just hot water and bitters. But also brandy, bitters, ice and soda for a refreshing sort of an old fashioned. In the dog days of summer though I'm more likely to reach for a G&T as a cocktail.

But overall, good light lager is just the best. You can drink it at a reasonable pace almost indefinitely while maintaining a warm, good-feeling buzz. Just about my favorite way to spend a summer afternoon is at the park beer garden under the oaks, with a book and a block of cheese, drinking a couple of liters of Spaten or Hofbrau helles for several hours.

New (to you) music thread?

I recently came across this choon:

Al Chem - Fistful of Snow

It's kind of a Marty Robbins x New Order sound. Surprisingly catchy.

I will always try to turn people onto Petey, who just dropped a new single Model Train Town.

It's great, but his best track (maybe?) is Freedom to Fuck Off.

The Gift by Ishmael Ensemble is a tune I've been enjoying lately. It almost sounds Thom Yorke-esque, like it could've been a track on the album In Rainbows.

Also I've been looking into East Asian classical music lately and some of it sounds incredibly alien and bizarre. Here are two examples: Korean ritual music and Vietnamese court music.

Do we know how early male children gravitate toward weapons of war?

Mine around 2? Pretty much after walking. They go to daycare so I don't know when they picked it up. I'm a gun nut who wanted to wait till they're older but they've started having sticks and pistols and rifles very early.

Probably instantly because males gravitate towards tools and machines in general as toddlers, weapons of war is a subcategory of that.

I'm finally starting to appreciate baby toys with baby boy (7 months).

The girls basically ignored their toys until they got dolls, and I wondered why all the rolling things, sliding things, wooden gears and whatnot even existed. But baby boy is into them! He has something with gears on it, and he actually turns the gears!

New Microsoft insanity.

I made a powerpoint presentation1, and went to save it. There were the normal options: Save, Save As, Export, Share, and one new one: Save as PDF.

Great, I thought. I want to save it as a PDF, so I will select the "Save as PDF" option. What a fool I was. Microsoft hadn't given me a convenient option to Save as PDF. It had embedded an ad for Adobe Acrobat Reader Pro's integration with their software, and offered me one free sample per 30 days, and the wonderful opportunity to buy (or rent, I assume) their software to unlock unlimited use and access many other features!

Needless to say, I went to "Save As", selected the .pdf filetype from the dropdown menu, and saved it as a pdf.

1 Not really, but Powerpoint some of the best software there is for simple image editing.

I don't recall having seen this. Are you sure this wasn't something bundled from the hardware OEM?

I've seen it on both my personal computer (built from parts, so no OEM) and my work computer.

Here's a screenshot. "Create Adobe PDF" on the right and "Save as Adobe PDF" on the left are advertisements, while "Create PDF/XPS Document" is the free (gratis) version.

The “Save as Adobe PDF” is helpful because it embeds fonts and images, which the normal “Save As” .pdf option doesn’t do. You do need an active Adobe Acrobat Pro subscription to use it though.

Ah, you appear to have Acrobat Reader installed which is what adds that (as well as the Share option). Microsoft isn't really to blame here, I think. They've done nothing except make it possible for third parties to integrate into Word. They may even have been legally required to do it.

FWIW, you don't need Acrobat Reader for general PDF reading.

Could be, but I'm blaming Microsoft regardless. Those ads have no place in the Microsoft Office Suite, regardless of who did it.

I've found that "Print to PDF" is also a workable option.

The best/worst videogame trailer I've ever seen. Whatever you might have expected, it wasn't what you're about to watch.

Holy shit, mewgenics is actually coming out? That's an appropriately idiotic trailer, I hope it approaches the original hype (I no longer expect anything to live up to the hype).

I hate the cat obsession.. but it's actually not the worst.

Publishers of Ark:Survival made a hilariously low-effort trailer that used a painful amount of AI and got absolutely trashed for it by everyone.

That series is cursed. After the initial game which was okayishly executed and flawlessly timed / taste attuned, they've been struggling. Whole thing is a write-off except for the concept except no studio is willing to create a game like that ever again.

By 'a game like that' I mean a game with no rules, no PvE zones, no way of saving items outside of the game and so on.

I went browsing my data hoard yesterday, and found a bunch of old 2000-2005 era flash cartoons I saved for various reasons. After figuring out how to make them play under linux I enjoyed a smattering of them for about an hour, mostly thanks to nostalgia. I still think Lesko's Revenge is my favorite. I barely remember how I found those things. Maybe 4chan back in the day? Limewire?

Watching them again then though, it does make it hard to keep judging kids so hard for their Skibidi Toilets or whatever.

Probably 4chan /f/, other spinoff imageboards, Newgrounds, maybe Something Awful.

it does make it hard to keep judging kids so hard for their Skibidi Toilets or whatever.

This is fair, there was a lot of faggotry (TL note: "faggotry" means cringe). The one big difference IMHO was that clicking in a mysterious .swf file in 2004 was way more exciting then watching Meat Canyon or whatever is considered edgy now. People used to make some truly bizarre, messed up, and entertaining** animations back then.

** I showed some animations from that time to a Zoomer and they were confused and horrified. So maybe not entertaining for everyone. Ah well.

hard to keep judging kids so hard for their Skibidi Toilets or whatever

I judge people for Skibidi Toilet not for the staying power of the meme itself, but simply because it's low effort compared to what came before it.

Actually, I don't know what's considered edgy any more. I remember the Newgrounds school shooting Pico games, which were... something else, certainly, but I don't think I ever saw anything quite as absurd after that.

I really wish it was possible to search flash cartoons. There's so many from 2000-2005 I just cannot find anymore.

Like that one with a gigantic Zangief in space on collision course for Earth and all of the video game characters become an army trying to stop him.

I really wish it was possible to search flash cartoons.

The Flashpoint Archive might have you covered.

You don't happen to have a torrent of these, or the time to chuck them up on MEGA or whatever, do you?

4chan.org/f/

I tried playing Motherload with ruffle on Linux the other day, and it was laggier than on the spyware bloated early 2000s used office PCs in the school computer lab.
Was flash just magic? How can we not emulate it even with vastly more powerful hardware?

Flash was vastly more inspired than the gui tech stacks in wide use today. You could do so much with it without having to be a programmer.

Where'd you get it? Maybe I'll try it and see what happens for me.

https://www.speedrun.com/motherload/resources/6geip

Is the one I used, but it's on archive.org too. It might have something to do with my Linux machine, but I've noticed old flash games playing like crap on my windows desktop too.

I'm actually surprised you aren't using native flash on one of your retro pcs! What OSes are you using for those?

You know, funnily enough I had Motherload: Goldium Edition as a bin/cue iso in my data hoard after all, and that ran just fine for me. Go figure.

Now that you mention my stable of retro pcs, I probably could. But for whatever reason I have zero attachment to running flash games on period appropriate hardware the same way I do DOS games, or 90's FPS, or even that era where every fucking game had bitchin' EAX effects.

From New York comes an interesting demonstration of how intestate succession works when all the decedent's close relatives are dead, forcing the administrator of the estate to search for distant relatives. If I cut out a bunch of supporting evidence, it looks like this:

Gary S. Stomporowski, a bus driver in the Town of Cheektowaga, died intestate at the age of 68 on September 26, 2021, leaving an estate valued at approximately $250,000.

Decedent's nearest living relatives were a maternal aunt and numerous cousins on both the maternal side and paternal side. Letters of Administration were issued to two of those cousins—Diane Sikorski, a paternal first cousin, and Tina Niespodzinski, a maternal first cousin.

At the kinship hearing, three witnesses testified: Tina, Diane, and Timothy Deck, a genealogist. I find all witnesses' testimony to be credible and persuasive. Five exhibits were entered into evidence, including a binder of documents compiled by Deck.

I find that that decedent was not married at the time of his death.

I am able to conclude, based on the totality of the evidence before me, that decedent had no children and the class of children can be closed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, I find that both of decedent's parents predeceased him, and the class of parents can be closed.

I am satisfied that decedent had one sibling, Timothy, who predeceased him, and that this class can be closed.

Based upon the testimony of Tina and Diane, I find that the class of nieces and nephews is closed.

Included in the Genealogist binder were copies of death certificates for both paternal grandparents: Isadore died on September 23, 1928, and Michaeline on March 4, 1959.

Based upon the totality of the evidence before me, and based upon the thorough research conducted by Genealogist Deck, I find that decedent had four paternal aunts who all predeceased him and the class of paternal aunts and uncles can be closed.

I conclude, based upon the evidence before me, that Sandra and Diane, both claimants herein, were the only children of Aunt Stephania and Bronislaus.

I find, based on the evidence before me, that Dennis, Kenneth, and James were the only children of Aunt Frances and Victor, and that all three survived decedent and are claimants herein.

Based upon the totality of the evidence before me and based upon the thorough research conducted by Genealogist Deck, I find that decedent was survived by five paternal first cousins, Sandra, Diane, Dennis, Kenneth, and James, and that the class of paternal first cousins can be closed.

[Maternal grandfather] Frank died on May 28, 1964, according to the death certificate included in the Genealogist binder. Despite the absence of a death certificate, I am satisfied that [maternal grandmother] Anna predeceased decedent.

Based upon the totality of the evidence before me and based upon the thorough research conducted by Genealogist Deck, I find that decedent was survived by one maternal aunt, Agnes. All of the other maternal aunts and uncles predeceased decedent, and the class of maternal aunts and uncles can be closed.

Et cetera for 29 letter-size pages in total. In the end, more than three years after the decedent's death: each of five paternal first cousins gets one-tenth of the estate (1/2 ÷ 5); a maternal aunt (who died while these proceedings were ongoing) gets one-fourteenth (1/2 ÷ 7); and each of 16 maternal first cousins (of whom one died while these proceedings were ongoing) gets 3/112 (1/2 × 6/7 ÷ 16). (The divisor of seven comes from the one inheriting maternal aunt plus the six dead maternal uncles and aunts who were the parents of the 16 inheriting maternal first cousins.) Note that attorney fees (in an amount still to be determined) will also have to be paid to the lawyer who was appointed by the judge to serve the interests of the non-Diane/Tina heirs as "guardian ad litem".

If you want to prevent all this rigmarole from happening when you die alone and unloved, write a will! (Don't forget to check your jurisdiction's laws, too. Some jurisdictions require witnesses for a will to be valid, but others do not.)

Aunt Stephania and Bronislaus

Kino names, gotta get back.

List of all given names in the decedent's family tree:

  • Decedent: Gary Stanislaus

  • Wife: Nancy

  • Parents: Stanley and Adeline

  • Brother: Timothy

  • Paternal grandparents: Isadore and Michaeline

  • Paternal aunts and uncles: Stephania (married Bronislaus), Charlotte (born Wladyslawa), Rose, and Frances (born Franciszka, married Victor)

  • Paternal first cousins: Sandra Antoinette (married Robert), Diane Marie (married Michael), Dennis, Kenneth, James

  • Maternal grandparents: Frank and Anna

  • Maternal aunts and uncles: Cecilia (married Harold), Margaret (married Frederick), Raymond, David, Irene (married John), Agnes (married Henry), Jeanette (married Robert), Diana (married Joseph), Frank (married Judith), Robert (married Mary Anne)

  • Maternal first cousins: Harold Jr., Ronald John, David Frederick, John Jr., James, Priscilla, Patricia, Robert Jr., Paul, Richard, Douglas, Kathryn, Bonny, Ann Marie, Randolph, Leonard, Charlene, Joyce, Sandra, Jeremie, Michelle, Carol, and Deborah

I actually used to have to do this kind of genealogical work when I was in oil and gas. It's a pain in the ass, and a lot of time you simply can't find anything. That being said, this is a little easier since you're only trying to figure out who the living heirs are, and not who the living descendants and devisees are of a guy who died in 1906 and had 9 children.

If you want to prevent all this rigmarole from happening when you die alone and unloved, write a will! (Don't forget to check your jurisdiction's laws, too. Some jurisdictions require witnesses for a will to be valid, but others do not.)

Don't DIY your own legal work; hire a lawyer. It's not expensive and it's easy to fuck it up if you do it yourself.

Gonna +1 on hire a lawyer to write your will. I gotta figure, if you have enough money to actually care about where it goes when you die, paying a tiny bit for an actual lawyer to do it is a no-brainer.

I'm following a lawyer's advice and will keep a tractor fender close by, at all times.

"Intestate" meaning "without testament"? Learned a new word today.

If you die on the intestate, you're on the highway to hell.

Part of me is reassured that society is not yet so corrupt that someone didn't just somehow funnel the money to their own coffers.

I mean, that depends a lot on the attorney's fees.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats