greyenlightenment
investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...
User ID: 68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1831b/1831b6099447fd369900d76fa35c34be505021d9" alt="Verified Email - Verified Email Verified Email"
Of course it is ideologically motivated. is this a surprise?
This is part of the unforeseen/unintended risk of making cuts. it creates added costs from the inefficiencies having to deal with the acute disruption to the system.
I also don't care for that lifestyle, but "engaging in risky behavior argument" as justification to deny care can be used for almost everything. Car accident while going too fast and not wearing a seatbelt? Snowboarding? Downhill skiing? Smoking? Football in high school? etcetera .
I heard they are tested a lot. . ironically it is safer than sex with a stranger
because making a new account means having to deal with twitter's default restrictions on new accounts , which are very onerous
A holistic approach is better. does the person have a history of only ai-assisted posts or a mix of both? A lot of people use AI to assist with writing when stuck. An account that only posts ai-like content should be banned though.
I support his rehiring because it's the ultimate repudiation of cancel culture, and about time the right grew a spine. You don't win a culture war by accepting the opponent's moral framing or terms.
Elez’s account, @nullllptr—a misspelling of a keyword in the C++ programming language—was deleted in December, but hundreds of brash, sometimes-sophomoric posts have been archived.
The deleted @nullllptr account previously went by the username @marko_elez, a review of archived posts shows. The user behind the @nullllptr also described themselves as an employee at SpaceX and Starlink.
How is this possible? Twitter specifically does not allow offline viewing anymore or archiving since Elon's buyout. changing the username and deleting the posts should have made the posts permanently and instantly inaccessible. AFIK there is no way to read a deleted tweet.
yeah but many of these people who are fired/quit are going to find other wasteful jobs , and also the severance $ by your same argument adds up to billions of dollars over a lifetime compounded compared to putting the $ in an index fund or something. DOGE will not put a dent in the national debt, but it does not need to. it's an effective rhetorical tool. Trump's successor in 2028 can cite all the cuts under DOGE as progress even if the national debt is still much higher.
If a waiter or delivery I give something
Ai models cannot pick up up the subtle but important details that distinguish it from human writing, like internal consistency. Imagine in 2010 writing that you like in "X" . Unless you moved, it must be remembered that you still live there. So it must store all this information and take it into account in a contextual sense.
AI-generated writing tends to overuse the passive voice. This gives it away
The irony of renting with a bad credit score, which is that you need to prove you have to means to not have to rent but choose to rent anyway.
A common observation by economists is that America's budget is not analogous to personal finances. Credit scores, credit ratings, and deficits do not mean the same thing on a national level as they do on a personal level. Credit worthiness means much more for smaller economics than it does for the US. The US is in a privileged position of creating debt with near impunity.
I think so. Tariffs are not going to put much of a debt in America's liabilities. America spends too much on domestic programs, not that it imports too much
It's already done. happened 2 hours ago
https://x.com/Ed_Realist/status/1837975714622296202?
There is enormous individual variably of metabolism, about as much as IQ, controlling for height,.
Early Rockefeller was a very good steward of his fortune, and a very good spender of it. For example, he essentially cured hookworm in the U.S.
that is amazing. perfect example of low hanging fruit. small spending that can lead to huge gains
Zuckerburg did a few things right, all more than a decade ago:
That is all you need to become super -successful. A good idea the execute near-perfectly on it, which he had from 2005-2015 or so.
Bought WhatsApp for $19 billion and promised to never advertise on the platform. Even though he has broken the promise, it's unclear how they will ever recoup this
He already has. Same for other purchases. The Metaverse is still a loss, but Wall St. has moved on.
All that other stuff works at boosting ad impressions and engagement. Evidently it semes to be working.
Bill Gates folllowed that model. Maybe Zuckerberg thinks the same way. But it's unlikely that anything he can do with his billions can undo the damage his social networks have done, and continue to do to the social fabric. The irony is that if he had just focused on making Facebook the best version of itself, he would probably be even richer today, and beloved for making the iconic product of the age.
At least Rockefeller's wealth and other Gilded Era wealth was fleeting, which quickly dwindled as the money was frittered away on dubious low-ROI philanthropy or wasteful spending. Today's tech-rich are much better at preserving their wealth and their industries less vulnerable to economic obsolescence or competition, unlike oil, ferries, cars, mining, or railroads.
Be charitable. You know what I meant. Appetite goes up, metabolic rate goes down, and then yes, people either eat more food and regain the weight, or their metabolism slows down so much that it doesn't make a difference how little they eat, they still regain the weight.
Yup. And where this plateau occurs controlling for height and sex is determined by genes. Some ppl have such crappy metabolism genes they are still fat cutting to 1500kcal/day and cannot lose more. many such cases. ironically, being a bigger glutton makes wight loss and leanness easier. A guy who maintains at 250 lbs eating 5kcal/day will find weight loss easier than the same guy at same height and weight who eats 3kcal/day.
what would that be? A fitness model? A lot of those ppl either have superior genetics, take stims and steroids, or do tons of cardio. it's the same 'cut calories' advice seen everywhere else
Bryan Johnson's food guide/protocol?
it is found here: https://protocol.bryanjohnson.com/Step-1-Step-2-Step-3
He says he's a vegan. There is some truth to this as an effective weight loss diet. Cultures and societies that primarily subsist on starches tend to be thin. Plant based foods have lower calorie density, save for nuts. When I lost weight, I found myself adhering to mostly a non-meat diet. Animal products limited to fish and some chicken.
It is an acquired taste, I guess, or most people skim rather than read his posts. Judging by his huge huge subscriber count and fame, evidently, this style worked for him.
Yeah this is why dieting is hard, why most people who diet regain it, etc.
- Prev
- Next
yeah being here and recent events pushed more towards the middle-right. otherwise, a decade+ ago I was often the most right-wing person in any social event
they aren't. the first 100 days are always hectic like this as the new admin overtakes the departing one by hiring and firing staff, and so on. At some point, the low-hanging DOGE cuts will be done, and Trump will have to legislate to enact any lasting change, which as his first term showed, is is major weakness and he risks spinning his wheels for the next 4 years. Also, people overestimate Trump's willingness or overturn the status quo; look how he punted on any decision regarding the Bitcoin reserve, delaying it by 180 days, which likely means it will not happen at all. Trump also is pro-business and wants to make inroads with tech; these are very much in keeping with the establishment.
The same people who in 2016-2017 predicted the demise of democracy were wrong then and I see little evidence they are right now. None of these criticisms are new. Trump is more competitive , which I think is misconstrued for wanting to subvert democracy for not accepting the 2020 results unhesitantly. Trump has visions of grandiosity but I don't see this crossing to fascism or other fears.
In terms of foreign policy, a case can be made Trumpism can make America safer. Under Biden, saw Russia invade Ukraine, China flexing its might against Taiwan, Hamas attack Israel, Iran attack Israel, etc. Foreign leaders perceive Biden as weak, compared to Trump. I feel safer under Trump compared to other administrations.
More options
Context Copy link