greyenlightenment
investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...
User ID: 68

The dems offer a lot: student loan forgiveness, healthcare reform, housing reform, etc. It's just the handouts are not as effective at winning votes.
GW Bush pandered extensively to Hispanics, and now Trump does the opposite and wins them over. Trump has made it abundantly clear, when it's not implied, the distinction between legal, productive immigrants compared to illegal or law-breaking ones. The former know and can infer that Trump is not referring to them.
"if the republican party is to survive" people have been using this line for as far as I can remember, and yet if Trump's win, strong House and Senate showings, the SCOTUS, and the woke-backlash are any indication, the Republican party is doing just fine, even thriving. Both parities operate a lot on vibes. if the vibes are negative , the incumbent may lose, like in 2020,2024. Except for maybe blacks and 'single young urban women' , voting patterns can change at a whim based on vibes.
then how does this explain flying? maybe people choose flying because its faster at the cost of loss of control
An alternative is of course having your groceries delivered, which is still far cheaper than owning a car.
Not always. in the long-run a car is cheaper. You pay a huge premium for delivery.
Car/stroad haters seem to overwhelmingly be young, childless, apartment-renting city-dwellers. If you somehow aren't, then your critiques make no sense.
lol, on Reddit there is a nearly 1-1 overlap between childfree/fuckcars subs
And they also are denser or in other ways optimized for public transport. America , except for some cities, has never been optimized in this way.
being stuck in traffic is offset by time waiting for the bus/train to come, stops, and so on. Except for maybe BART during heavy congestion, it is not faster.
Cars give convenience , which is close enough. Public transportation is slow and a waste of time even if it saves a small amount of fuel. Time wasted waiting for the bus, bus stops, and then walking too and from the stops.
Why is modern architecture so bad, and so common?
This is more like one person's opinion than a matter of fact
the WTC facade, composed of tridents situated above the square aqueduct-like arches of the foyer, was an example of visually pleasing modern architecture. it does not always have to be bad.
yeah AFQT is basically a modified IQ test
cognitive tests are already allowed and common: it's called the Wonderlic test. There of tons of threads on Reddit of people having taken it. The NFL has used the test for a decades and not once has been sued despite blacks consistently doing much worse than whites.
sounds like a copypasta or bad ai
yeah this is a ham-fisted way of doing it
yeah, but the upside is limited. no 'exits' or huge bonusses with park job. most of the waste is not from these jobs; it's medical costs when people get sick and cannot pay, for example. that is a big one.
others mentioned , on twitter, that this selects for people who are the best at bullshitting.
how many people can the administration fire? i would like to see the TSA be trimmed, but I would not hold my breath on that.
I know that Belisarius thinks I'm a far-leftist (lol), but I think that a fair reading my post history will show that I am what I present myself as, more or less a classical liberal who hates both the left and the right.
yeah being here and recent events pushed more towards the middle-right. otherwise, a decade+ ago I was often the most right-wing person in any social event
Accelerationists (the three or four actual ones for whom it's not just a funny pretense) must be rubbing their hands raw with glee right now. Things are moving very fast.
they aren't. the first 100 days are always hectic like this as the new admin overtakes the departing one by hiring and firing staff, and so on. At some point, the low-hanging DOGE cuts will be done, and Trump will have to legislate to enact any lasting change, which as his first term showed, is is major weakness and he risks spinning his wheels for the next 4 years. Also, people overestimate Trump's willingness or overturn the status quo; look how he punted on any decision regarding the Bitcoin reserve, delaying it by 180 days, which likely means it will not happen at all. Trump also is pro-business and wants to make inroads with tech; these are very much in keeping with the establishment.
The same people who in 2016-2017 predicted the demise of democracy were wrong then and I see little evidence they are right now. None of these criticisms are new. Trump is more competitive , which I think is misconstrued for wanting to subvert democracy for not accepting the 2020 results unhesitantly. Trump has visions of grandiosity but I don't see this crossing to fascism or other fears.
In terms of foreign policy, a case can be made Trumpism can make America safer. Under Biden, saw Russia invade Ukraine, China flexing its might against Taiwan, Hamas attack Israel, Iran attack Israel, etc. Foreign leaders perceive Biden as weak, compared to Trump. I feel safer under Trump compared to other administrations.
Of course it is ideologically motivated. is this a surprise?
This is part of the unforeseen/unintended risk of making cuts. it creates added costs from the inefficiencies having to deal with the acute disruption to the system.
I also don't care for that lifestyle, but "engaging in risky behavior argument" as justification to deny care can be used for almost everything. Car accident while going too fast and not wearing a seatbelt? Snowboarding? Downhill skiing? Smoking? Football in high school? etcetera .
I heard they are tested a lot. . ironically it is safer than sex with a stranger
because making a new account means having to deal with twitter's default restrictions on new accounts , which are very onerous
A holistic approach is better. does the person have a history of only ai-assisted posts or a mix of both? A lot of people use AI to assist with writing when stuck. An account that only posts ai-like content should be banned though.
I support his rehiring because it's the ultimate repudiation of cancel culture, and about time the right grew a spine. You don't win a culture war by accepting the opponent's moral framing or terms.
- Prev
- Next
ACA and The Biden-Harris Administration's Student Debt Relief Plan
sure, it's not the same as single payer and free college for all, but it's something
More options
Context Copy link