pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
No bio...
User ID: 278
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
13hr ago
The police can go away. The power can go out. The trucks might not show up to stock the grocery store. These things can happen. People can make them happen, if they believe it to be to their advantage, and a great way to convince them of that is to make them feel that they and their families are in danger if Something Drastic Is Not Done.
I mean, the problem is I can personally take active steps in my life to overcome those obstacles. They are difficulties on a level I can immediately understand and take practical steps to remedy. I think to a lot of people those problems are a lot more tolerable than the problems created by unaccountable bureaucrats and judges with alien moral values exploiting arcane legalisms.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
2d ago
That in itself would be a pretty grave intrusion into the President's authority to conduct foreign diplomacy. If that is permissible, it would be a short distance to e.g., court-ordered economic sanctions or court-ordered economic aid.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
3d ago
Exterminator.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
3d ago
One thing you'll need is a decent switch. You can usually pick up retired enterprise switches on eBay for not too much. But you'll want something that can at least handle a variety of VLAN configurations, so you can segment your testing networks and prevent things from talking to each other that should not be able to.
You might also want to consider beefing up one of the computers (or getting a retired server) with RAM and installing Proxmox, a free hypervisor for KVM/LXC. You can then set up a VM for docker containers, and VMs for various test systems or toolkits.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
3d ago
Don't know how it is 'round your parts, but I found out firsthand that there is approximately one full-time mechanical clock repairer/restorer in my metroplex, who is also well past retirement and cannot meet demand.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
4d ago
Not quite an exact quote. Trump did not call Justice Ginsburg an "amazing man."
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
4d ago
Was up north with time to kill while watching rain fall on the lake. Read Arthur C. Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama over the weekend. I enjoyed it, though the edition had an appalling forward. I can see why the ending was controversial, as the central mystery of the book is not resolved, but it did not bother me as much as I expected it would. Also started a novel Subsunk about various submarine rescue developments and incidents. However it was printed in 1960 and I suspect may be slightly out of date.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
7d ago
If the Court has a better plan, then they should order it and get it over with.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
7d ago
That is a problem for El Salvador to deal with. If they disagree, they can release him.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
7d ago
There are multiple meanings to "US Government is paying to house prisoners in ES". One is that the U.S. is basically paying hotel fees per prisoner to have them housed in an El Salvador prison. In this case, sure you could simply stop paying the fee and presumably El Salvador might feel obliged to release him. Another is that the U.S. is providing a block grant or something else of value of the privilege of having the repatriated nationals accepted by El Salvador at all, or as general compensation for the fact that many need to be imprisoned by El Salvador. In that case, it's not a simple matter of procedure but actual foreign policy to threaten to cut off funding over the disposition of a single individual.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
7d ago
The point is it doesn't matter what people notice and believe if they are doing it privately. In attempting to forcibly reshape reality based on the premise that these things that people noticed and believe are actually wrong, progressives force them to either have to say them publicly, which sucks, or to swallow injustice as a quasi-religious sacrificial rite.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
7d ago
If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?" And what assurance shall there be that the Executive will not train its broad discretionary powers upon its political enemies?
The answer is that there is no such assurance from the legal system and never has been, and that it's the "lawcucks" who have fooled themselves into believing their fortresses of sand were ever strong enough to stem the tide.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
8d ago
Generally, rural areas are much easier to work with for several reasons. First, outside of incorporated municipalities, you generally only have to worry about permitting from the town or county, which generally are set up to default allow. Farmland is not especially valuable, and even inside a municipality or village, you have far fewer people to have to negotiate with, and who are generally starving for any kind of economic growth.
There are exceptions, of course. One is areas in which the state or federal government owns most of the land. In that case, your development will probably be confined to municipalities who can then afford to be a lot pickier about what they allow. Another is areas that are already wealthy and have little need or interest in further economic growth, like, say, Sedona. They will show a lot more resistance to changes that alter the makeup or vibe of the area. Combine the two and you get places like Aspen, well-established as a playground for the wealthy, with a moratorium on all new residential construction and renovation, and surrounded by unbuildable, wild, federally protected land.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
8d ago
7
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
8d ago
On the other hand, battleships can perform a function (armored mobile very large gun batteries) that is both useful and not directly replaced by other capabilities, but they were deemed obsolete anyways. It could also be the case that something is obsolete because the special capabilities they do bring are just not worth the enormous cost.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
8d ago
Just to add perspective since I was alive and watching the news during the Clinton drama, there were a variety of objections in increasing importance:
- He cheated on his wife
- He cheated on his wife with an intern over whom he was the clear superior
- He did the above in the Oval Office which is a government workplace
- He did all of the above, and then lied about to the public and Congress
- He did all of the above, and then lied about it in a sworn deposition
Characterizing the reaction to Clinton as being primarily about the sanctity of marriage is, I think, not remotely reasonable.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
10d ago
Well - do we know, actually, that this isn't what happened here? I think it's pretty likely they did in fact fly to an airport and not directly to a prison, and that it's pretty likely they did in fact turn them over to El Salvadoran custody at that point. Or are you making the stronger demand that we not deport anyone who is likely to be imprisoned in their home country? Unfortunately this amounts to a demand that we provide sanctuary and extra privileges to the world's criminals, which is outrageous.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
It's the same thing, unless you believe that it is not possible for El Salvador to prosecute their national for a crime committed in the United States. I'm not an expert on Salvadoran law, but I would be very surprised if there was such a statutory limitation. The U. S. certainly has none.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
What is your preferred term to describe El Salvador's role "imprisoning non-Salvadorians not accused of any crime in El Salvador, at the request of and and with payment from the USA?"
That might indeed be a circumstance where there is a clear contractual agreement with an obvious consideration. But that is not what has happened here: the prisoner is a Salvadoran national with no residency right in the U.S., in El Salvador. El Salvador has the right to prosecute him regardless of our opinion, so they are not clearly doing anything they couldn't or wouldn't do on their own.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
Obviously the 6th Amendment does not apply if the government is not prosecuting them, and a deportation proceeding is not a criminal trial. Foreign nationals being tried by foreign courts have no 6th Amendment case with the U. S. Government.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
I was asking an interlocutor. They are not bound by judicial rules.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
Sure, but he's not under U.S. jurisdiction. I don't see that we have any obligation to bust him out of prison over the objection of El Salvador.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
I would consider removal to a foreign prison, perhaps with access to petition the court via writing, to be a form of exile.
pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
11d ago
I wonder how long it will take for the real gang members (if there are any being deported) to wisen up to the fact that murdering an ICE agent (or just a random civilian bystander) will immensely improve their outcomes (if they survive the encounter). Then they get a nice long trial in the US.
Why? Is there something that would prevent the U.S. from deporting immediately and letting El Salvador prosecute the case?
It seems that you are leaving off the very first paragraph of Section 1505, which precedes the one you posted. It reads:
It would seem to me that if they can establish the alleged facts, it clearly fits under "removes from any place, conceals, covers up". It does not contain the required element of corruption which you wrote about, just "intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance".
More options
Context Copy link