site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  11mo ago (text post)   5609 thread views

Quality Contributions Report for December 2023

This is the Quality Contributions Roundup. It showcases interesting and well-written comments and posts from the period covered. If you want to get an idea of what this community is about or how we want you to participate, look no further (except the rules maybe--those might be important too).

As a reminder, you can nominate Quality Contributions by hitting the report button and selecting the "Actually A Quality Contribution!" option. Additionally, links to all of the roundups can be found in the wiki of /r/theThread which can be found here. For a list of other great community content, see here.

These are mostly chronologically ordered, but I have in some cases tried to cluster comments by topic so if there is something you are looking for (or trying to avoid), this might be helpful.

Quality Contributions in the Main Motte

@DaseindustriesLtd:

@WhiningCoil:

@Fruck:

@aaa:

@Capital_Room:

@NullHypothesis:

Contributions for the week of November 27, 2023

@MadMonzer:

@TracingWoodgrains:

@gattsuru:

@CrispyFriedBarnacles:

Contributions for the week of December 4, 2023

@ControlsFreak:

@raggedy_anthem:

@ThisIsSin:

@Walterodim:

@FiveHourMarathon:

@MathWizard:

Contributions for the week of December 11, 2023

@FarNearEverywhere:

@satirizedoor:

@hydroacetylene:

@cjet79:

@gattsuru:

@ApplesauceIrishCream:

@Capital_Room:

@ControlsFreak:

@FiveHourMarathon:

Altruistic Effectivism

@TracingWoodgrains:

@FarNearEverywhere:

@naraburns:

Contributions for the week of December 18, 2023

@Dean:

@faul_sname:

@NullHypothesis:

@Highlandclearances:

@Glassnoser:

@FarNearEverywhere:

@Felagund:

@ymeskhout:

Contributions for the week of December 25, 2023

@FCfromSSC:

@FarNearEverywhere:

@satirizedoor:

@nomenym:

10
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thank you for the nomination, and congratulations to all of our quality contributors!

If you will forgive a bit of self-advertising, a couple of months ago I wrote another comment about the Declaration of Independence in the context of justifying secession. I'd hoped that people might find it interesting, but then I managed to post it in the old CW thread after the new one had just gone up.

Edit to add: I have reposted the comment here.

Looks like a good post that would lead to interesting discussion to me. I'd welcome it being reposted as a top-level in a current main thread.

I'm inclined to be reluctant to self-promote as well. But it's usually really obvious when the situation is somebody writes low-quality posts that were properly exposed and got low engagement because they were low quality, then aggressively self-promotes them to try and compensate, versus a high-quality post that just went up at the wrong time.

Two quality contributions, from me? I'm quite — pleasantly — surprised. Thank you to whoever all nominated those comments.

Happy New Year to one and all, and I am flabbergasted to get so many nominations for quality contributions, thank you, thank you, thank you!

Now I just have to try not to immediately spoil this good record by losing my temper and picking up another ban 😁

Nice job everyone

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats