This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Hey now, I'm sure plenty of people here hated occupational licensing before it was cool. The Institute for Justice has been suing some of the more absurd boards around the country for 15 years, but its still common for a cosmetology license to require 1500 hours of training vs 300 for an EMT. Louisiana famously had an onerous flower arrangement license, scaled back since 2010ish. Not until 2020 did Florida scale back its ~1000hour license for interior residential decorating. There was a country-wide movement to pare back licenses for braiding hair. The ring cam anecdote is new to me.
The Gist recently had an interview with a journalist looking into occupational licensing. Might be the same author you referenced. They got into the weeds about how doctors who become drug addicted, drug peddlers, or do some patient related sex crimes maintain there licenses, often going to work in prison jails when nobody else will hire them.
Was that the one they put in place after an interior decorator killed sixteen Czechoslovakians?
That was in New Jersey.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
One of the things I was pretty interested in when visiting various less developed nations is that there was a surprising lack of visible homelessness. Example: Thailand. There were no homeless on the streets outside of extremely and visibly disabled people (missing arms/legs/eyes, severe mental disabilities, etc). I suppose it's easy to stay off the streets if you can just go buy some coconuts and sell the juice on the street without a gaggle of PMCs following you around issuing fines. The barrier to entry for commerce seemed to be minimal at the actual worst.
Now I look at the US with many of its large cities overrun with homeless encampments, hear about bullshit like some jurisdictions enforcing a "flower arrangement license" and it really makes me disgusted at the evil we have wrought.
In the third world the difference between countries with lots of homelessness and little homelessness is typically how easy it is to squat land around the cities. Even in the poorest places you won't see that many homeless people if anyone can go 20km in the direction of the poorest urban settlement and build a shack right after the last round of shacks. Much wealthier third world countries that restricts such settlement will have lots of visible homelessness.
Note also that "squatting land and building a shack" is just a specific form of development in general; when the commons outside the city are enclosed (for reasons that are real- like lack of physical land or lack of accessible water- or fake like environmentalism or democratic capture), prices skyrocket.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Was in Bangkok a week ago and saw many homeless people, and several beggars who might or might not have also been homeless, including children. One man, as you say, was disabled and seemed to have had his hands removed or maybe they never developed, but most seemed relatively whole. This does not necessarily contradict your point, but even Japan, for example, has homeless people, and Osaka used to have fairly visible encampments around the castle until they were bussed out for the World Cup years ago--to who knows where. I've seen homeless people in most larger cities in Europe, in Harare, Bulawayo, Johannesburg, Durban, etc.
More options
Context Copy link
I saw a homeless beggar in China once. Two Chinese cops were standing over him and very kindly talking to him. Completely blocking his begging attempts. I didn't observe this for long, but I saw no one cross those two cops to give him money.
More options
Context Copy link
So I spent a solid chuck of time in Thailand and was struck by all the severely disabled people. This is approx 2008. I thought about giving them money because you can't fake missing all 10 fingers and open wounds. A bit of googling led me to news posts and forums alleging that these people are essentially slaves to the local mafia. They are bussed in to beg, and kept in a pitiful state to earn more.
More options
Context Copy link
The people issuing fines for unlicensed flower arrangement are not, generally, PMCs. They’re florist shop owners.
American homeless aren't (generally) aspiring florists and coconut peddlers stymied by regulations, they are the people Thailand, at best, just lets die, and quite often executes.
Or pushes into places away from the tourists, Latin America style, to do drugs among themselves.
Thats death on a longer timeline, generally.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Flowers are an insane business, so it's flower wholesalers actually, usually as a way to protect their laundering operations. There are a couple of florists, but most florists are the female version of model train enthusiasts, and their shops act as tax write offs for their husbands.
Well sure, my point was that it was decidedly not-PMC business owners.
I know, I just know about that ridiculous industry so I wanted to build on your comment. I tried to write it so it would seem more like an addition than a correction, but I failed.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link