site banner
PaperclipPerfector  19d ago (text post)   35134 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 3, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BIPOC would drop the baizuo as soon as they got the upper hand.

Possible in some European countries where the vast majority of migrants have a form of shared identity (Islam), but in the US it seems much less likely. What, some coalition of black people, Hispanics and Asians decides to oppress white people? Many of those groups dislike each other more.

What, some coalition of black people, Hispanics and Asians decides to oppress white people?

Well for one thing, BIPOC (like URM or the even more direct NAM) specifically excludes Asians.

coalition of black people, Hispanics and Asians decides to oppress white people? Many of those groups dislike each other more.

this is contemporary politics in LA and cities across the US

Mostly still with heavy involvement from non-Hispanic whites.

In the US they were cooperating nicely and not disagreeing almost at all about DEI nonsense. The only people who were somewhat problematic were Chinese moms with their stupid insistence on segregating their kids from blacks.

The assimilated members of the PMC, maybe. I can tell you that, here on the ground, latinos and blacks hate each other with the burning fury of a thousand suns. They hate us because we take their jobs, speak Spanish, and don't feel an ounce of white guilt; we hate them because they steal our shit, deal drugs, and live on welfare. If it wasn't for white cops keeping the peace, we would be totally be fighting each other on the streets.

But you'd agree that blacks and Hispanics hate whites more than they hate each other, no?

Uh, no. They both hate each other way more than they do whites. Blacks hate Hispanics for sucking up to whites, actively discriminating against them, and using Spanish to shut them out of conversations. You do find a minority of blacks who hate whites as much as they do Hispanics but it's a minority. At least whites are willing to speak to them.

Hispanics for their part seem to see blacks as lazy untrustworthy criminals who try to weaponize the government against everyone else, and like whites for our money even if they otherwise avoid us.

...hispanics do not hate whites. Where did you get that idea?

Probably that there's a few activists who've figured out a great way to get the gringo's money is to do performative anti-white hate. Behind closed doors these people brag about their European blood and use 'black guy' as an insult.

The whole thing is already fraying. The fewer whites there are the weaker the ability of the progressive class to both maintain harmony despite the contradictions in their coalition and the fewer "racists" you can tax without accidentally harming a fellow coalition member.

And you can get sucked into so many loser positions that people who don't see their identity as being cheerleaders for some minority coalition can just opt out.

People like Jasmine Crockett writing off complaints about DEI and AA as just the complaints of mediocre white men (as if SFFA didnt involve Asian complaints) are just sad to me.

It's like watching an addled actor recite an outdated script and waiting for applause that'll never come.

Indeed, Mexican v black tensions are the most probable way for racism to make a comeback and the different kinds of Hispanics would mostly rather cozy up to whites than each other. And Asians seem to mostly have views on other non-white groups that make storefront* look tolerant.

*Should be stormfront.

And Asians seem to mostly have views on other non-white groups that make storefront look tolerant.

Colemak keyboard?

storefront

The '92 LA race riots being a particularly salient example of this.

Man I knew there was a joke in there but couldn't find it.

This no longer seems to be the case.

https://www.ljzigerell.com/?p=9002

What, some coalition of black people, Hispanics and Asians decides to oppress white people?

They could call it the Democratic party. I think it could work!

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats