site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2mo ago (text post)   37743 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 8, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And some who would otherwise vote Republican, because they like RFK's vaccine skepticism.

Yes, I should have distinguished between the pre-debate RFK supporters, who are likely mostly single-issue anti-Covidians from both sides (still probably leaning Democrat, though), and the large bump from the debate, which is what I said above.

I live in a red tribe crank bubble- 0% of the people I know well enough to have talked about it with will vote RFK. The like two red tribe leftists will vote Biden and everyone else will vote Trump.

In real life republican conspiracy theorists have issues other than vaccines that they care about(abortion, guns), accept that Trump will stay within acceptable bounds on vaccines, and don't trust RFK.

I live in a red tribe crank bubble- 0% of the people I know well enough to have talked about it with will vote RFK. The like two red tribe leftists will vote Biden and everyone else will vote Trump.

I'm in a similar bubble in a blue state, but at least half of the red tribers close to me are voting RFK as a protest vote. My wife -- who campaigned against state vaxx laws a few years ago -- has an RFK sign and is putting it in our lawn.

I try to tell them that absent vaccines they would loathe RFK, but it's hard to draw that distinction when the other options are so revolting.

Blue states probably have different dynamics.

I've totally lost touch with almost everyone who got fired for not getting jabbed (a lot of them were basically migratory workers or ready to retire and leave this blue hellstate anyway). Are people still so single-issue about it?

Maybe that's the wrong way to put it... The whole thing just fed into my existing partisanship along with all the other 2020 insanity. I can't imagine picking out the vax as the One Thing that radicalized me about that year. Aren't lockdowns just as big an issue?

Kind of a shocking reminder of Scott's old "different worlds" essay (which, holy fuck, has a David Gerard quote in it, talk about bubbles)

Yes, there are a lot of young male republicans for whom the vaccine was the government trying to force us to poison ourselves.

But trump is anti-mandate, so these people are voting for him because guns, even if the vaccine is a top issue for them.

Personally, I find nowadays that anything relating to COVID and/or vaccines for it just makes my eyes glaze over, as a result of hearing about it constantlly for two years.

I'm rather surprised that there still seem to be so many cranks who are obsessed with being anti-vax or anti-lockdown after this much time has passed.

To be otherwise is to be fiscally irresponsible, I’d argue.

20% inflation over 2 years while saving no lives and being forced at gunpoint to inject myself with something that doesn’t help, as well as being a prisoner in my own home?

Never Again.

People are also still obsessed with slavery, government treatment of natives, the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, Jim Crow, and apartheid, and much more time has passed for each of those. It’s not surprising that some people who feel that their rights were violated will hold a grudge and want to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Not quite single issue, but the COVID-19 vaccines are still a no-go in most of the Trump crowd. The phrase “turbo-cancer” has joined “died suddenly” in the vocab of people convinced the jab is the greatest threat to public safety since AIDS.

greatest threat to public safety since AIDS

I mean unless you're a gay man or shoot up heroin, has AIDS ever really been much of a threat?

It's not, but we were told it was -- which creates some interesting parallels with the covid situation.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats