site banner
PaperclipPerfector  20d ago (text post)   2559 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for February 2, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait, but a convertible is not a regular car. A regular car is Honda Civic.

I mean, they offer Mustangs as coupes, too.
In fact, the Mustang is the only car Ford sells (and the only car any American automaker makes); so if that isn't a "normal" car I'm not sure what is.

(Why anyone would buy the coupe model when a convertible exists is anyone's guess, since the rear seats in a coupe are much less useful than those in a convertible because you hit your head on the roof if you try to use them, but I digress.)

the Mustang is the only car Ford sells (and the only car any American automaker makes)

Are you working off an unusual definition of "car"?

It is not unreasonable to exclude crossovers and SUVs from the word "car". The US government calls them "light-duty trucks" and imposes on them more-lenient fuel-efficiency standards.

For me the reasons to get the coupe over the convertible:

  • I don't want to have to devote a precious garage space to protecting the soft top
  • Not being able to leave anything in the car when out
  • The superior performance from the rigidity of the coupe
  • IRL I'll hardly ever drive with the top down. Your girl will think it's fun for 5 minutes, then be annoyed her hair is all tangled.
  • Generally not having to worry about leaks or a surprise rain storm destroying the interior of my car
  • No Greg, I can't drive us all to lunch again. I have the coupe today. We'll have to put miles on your leased Infinity if you want to go to lunch.

(1) The Honda Civic is a bit bloated nowadays (base price 24 k$). Some people would say that a "regular car" is more like a Mitsubishi Mirage (17 k$) or a Nissan Versa (19 k$ with CVT).

(2) Cheap Civic-ish cars used to be available in convertible form. See, e. g., the Geo Metro.

Some people would say that a "regular car" is more like a Mitsubishi Mirage (17 k$) or a Nissan Versa (19 k$ with CVT).

Surely a "regular car" can't be one of the two cheapest cars on the market? One of which is discontinued due to lack of demand?

Surely a "regular car" can't be one of the two cheapest cars on the market?

I still see a lot of cheap 20-year-old Civics on the roads. And the US market is not the only market in the world.

One of which is discontinued due to lack of demand?

If the government has made all the regular cars unprofitable to sell, and effectively mandated that only bloated, expensive vehicles be sold, do the bloated vehicles become regular cars? I think the answer is "no".

Cheap Civic-ish cars used to be available in convertible form

A wide variety of cars used to be available like that. Now there are only two that sell for less than 50K new, and one of them only seats two.

An electric Honda Del Sol would be pretty fun!

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats