site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2mo ago (text post)   33980 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 9, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why bring up the Springfield pets thing?

Because when democrats are forced to fact check that and say "the guy who is seen carrying a goose is South African" etc, they're not helping themselves much. And there's police reports of people killing geese in the park and loading them in cars from Springfield, Ohio.

Here's a interview from Springfield. It's rough.

Here's another thirty minutes of residents complaining.

Kamala is a competent but relatively weak debater,

She's being accused of having used help during the debate, though. Her earrings look very similar to wireless headphone earrings being sold. And her frequent gaffes with compound sentences are suspicious.

On the other hand, she did pass the bar exam, so, it might be a legit okay performance.

Is it actually against the rules for candidates to be fed lines by earpiece?

In any case, I think the idea that large numbers of Haitians are hunting ducks in parks seems unlikely given how wealthy American society is. If they’re legally resettled refugees they’re provided with homes and more than enough food by the resettlement NGO/agency; if they’re illegal then they’re working cash in hand anyway in a society where even a very low income is more than sufficient to buy food much tastier and easier to prepare than semi-wild fowl.

People from a desperately poor country wouldn't be happy to save money by cooking up the meat that's just wandering around that the wealthy Americans don't seem to want? Of course they would.

In my state getting a hunting/fishing license for $1 is a low-income benefit that's available and seems to be popular, so the idea of people ignoring the middleman because they don't expect any enforcement does not strike me as inherently absurd.

Reminds me of a story from a former coworker, who grew up eating the "free chicken" at the store. It wasn't until she started shopping on her own she realized what was actually happening was her dad picked up a rotisserie chicken, family ate it while shopping, and disposed of the rest before checkout. The store workers were apparently too polite to complain.

Wild ducks/geese have a distinctive taste which lots of people really like; it’s entirely possible that they just want to eat free range goose.

In some ways, I think it's funny that we've made a full cycle from "those geese belong to your feudal lord" to various democratic revolutions, all the way back to "you can't eat those geese because of the treaty on migratory birds your duly-elected representatives approved generations ago".

Not endorsing any particular side there, just observing.

Penniless Haitian migrants are now connoisseurs of game.

I’m imagining the film now. Somewhere between Ratatouille and The Princess & The Frog.

Catatouille, perhaps? Or The Princess & The Goose?

Jean-Paul was a Haitian immigrant who worked at the best kitchens in Paris, but who was called back to Haiti to look after his ailing mother. Now a poor refugee in Ohio, he eventually wins over the at-first-hesitant locals by dazzling them with delicious dishes cooked with animals he hunts himself at night on excursions from his small (but tidy) tent at the edge of the park. At the end of the movie the mayor (a wealthy car dealership owner) becomes his business partner in a new brasserie, and all the residents turn out for opening night.

Rednecks are, so why not?

Also everyone bitches about geese constantly around here, I could really easily picture someone saying Well if you want me to get rid of them...

Is it actually against the rules for candidates to be fed lines by earpiece?

They were disallowed from even having their own paper notes prepared, so certainly I would think that a live earpiece feeding them information would be wildly against the rules.

if they’re illegal then they’re working cash in hand anyway in a society where even a very low income is more than sufficient to buy food much tastier and easier to prepare than semi-wild fowl.

Only Haitians can truly appreciate how much more succulent a meal is when you can taste its fear.

(Ohio) Canadian geese fear nothing, not even death.

They're really annoying.

Agreed. If you are even debating the question, it’s a win by default for Trump.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats