@professorgerm's banner p

professorgerm

clutching my imitation pearls

3 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 12 12:41:49 UTC

				

User ID: 1157

professorgerm

clutching my imitation pearls

3 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 12 12:41:49 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1157

Like in Iran.

"Some people prefer to be referred to as a gender different from the one they were born with."

"Oh. Okay."

Isn't the Iran solution to force gay men into reassignment surgery or execute them?

It's not exactly a San Francisco of anything-goes roles that you seem to suggest.

Solitary's always an option, but I suspect the "put men in women's prisons" folx aren't too fond of that for other reasons.

The old "recreate pillarized civilization from the ground up" retort, really?

The problem with this response has always been is that categories vary wildly between groups.

The problem is that Scott's essay was silly, socially motivated, and shot a hole through the chest of Rationalism as being anything more than postmodern word games with a nerd's coat of hobby paint.

Categories are made for man, not man for the categories.

HA! You know, I just realized that in context the phrasing highlights quite explicitly the TERF complaint that most trans discourse is inherently misogynistic. Indeed, the categories were made for man.

Can't believe it took me this long. I wish I could think Scott was being subtly Straussian but no chance of him being less than a true believer.

Did the British make a mistake in acquiescing to the post-WWII European security architecture?

Undeniably

now that trans people are everywhere (thanks to anti-trans activists)

what other causes can so thoroughly be blamed on The Enemy?

very postmodern dao, the enemy of thing is solely responsible for thing.

The innate differences of men and women have been used to excuse systematic denial of women’s rights. Same for white vs. black.

The systematic denial of differences hasn't exactly been a godsend for equality, rights, or anti-racism/anti-sexism as defined by sane people instead of sign-flipped racists/sexists. Quite the opposite!

Millwall Bushwhackers

Huh, fun to have context on why Bernard chooses Millwall supporters to punch him out on Black Books.

This is a major plot driver of Law Abiding Citizen, the prosecutor accepts a plea deal to protect his conviction rate.

seems like one of those "movement versus ideology" questions.

there are many perfectly normal EAs, but they don't really form EA. They do EA, they don't lead the organizations or write about it that much.

You can not both optimize for pulling people's heartstrings and for the actual impact of your interventions. Do the former and you will turn off the people who are interested in the latter.

Fully disagree that they care about the actual impact in legible and clear terms, especially if we're talking about rationalism more than EA. Or at least, the impact they care about is not always the stated impact.

You only have to look at what they won't question to see that, or how badly they fumble when push comes to shove and they have to work with normies.

why can't the US incubate some subcultures that are deviant from its prevalent norms?

If anything the US incubates too many subcultures that are deviant from its prevalent norms, such that its prevalent norms have been replaced many times.

Here in old Europe, nude beaches have been a thing since at least 1960, I guess. My understanding is that this is very much non-sexual nudity, generally... I think kids should be definitely shielded... even more if it is strangers fucking who might be into all sorts of kinks.

Strikes me that there's a certain cultural gestalt to the consideration too? Nude beaches are A Thing, knowingly nonsexual, from certain kinds of cultures.

One knows that Vibecamp largely pulls from, ah, very different kind of culture. Aella has attended in the past but not this year afaict. There is insufficient cultural gestalt to mix the kind of things they're mixing.

Who are all these parents taking their kids to vibe camp and having bad experiences? Who are you offended on behalf of?

isn't it also quite expensive to attend? or does it only look expensive to us lowly peons in the real world and not to folx with more money than brains?

I'm with St. Rev. Dr. Rev.

But also, yeah, it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary high openness and social status depends on his not understanding it. They refuse to wrestle with their inability to understand normal human intuitions, they only question the things that are comfortably acceptable to question in their social groups, none of this is surprising and there will be more suffering generated by it than prevented.

I hope that these issues don't completely derail the movement

Possibly my first direct interaction with Scott was commenting that if the movement wanted to reach normal people, the whole poly obsession (during one of its many peaks) was an unnecessary expense of weirdness points. He replied that the people that said that were a much worse cost of weirdness points among people he cared about (or something like that).

Meaningful rationalism is dead, if it ever really lived. The decent parts of EA can live on as ideas but the movement is exactly what anyone should've expected up front.

Woo, me too!

I found the religion questions a bit annoying but overall not the most ridiculous of these things.

Denmark, where the left also adopted a moderate anti-immigration attitude. I don't know exactly how successful it's been but at least they're not arresting people for complaining or trying to ban any party that pushes back.

a comment on skibboleth's style and regardlessness for facts of the relevant cases, as you pointed out.

why let facts get in the way of hating the rest of the forum?

You better believe it's priced in

You can't do much about people already here.

You can absolutely do something about not importing more of the most violent and rapey people in the world.

And yet! Only one European country has done anything to slow down on that, instead of spending billions of dollars bringing them in and billions more covering up that they brought them in.

I can assure you that it compares to what happened 1939-45 like a sparrow compares to an A380

Completely opposite models of failure play out in different time scales.

the expression of Europeans' collective preference

Indeed, to stop immigration effectively would likely require destroying the ECHR, and ultimately completely undoing/redoing the EU.

the reality is that if people consistently voted against immigration as one of their absolute upper-echelon top priorities, they would get politicians who actually stop immigration

I think this underestimates the effectiveness of the last 50-75 years of propaganda on what kind of behavior is acceptable and for whom.

Edit: whoops totally misread the last line, nvm

It’s good that public figures are calling for calm. That is the most important part of their jobs.

Moving my response here. I don't think it makes you Leftist Shill, exactly, more like Usefully Naive Centrist.

Public figures calling for calm have burned all their credibility over and over, and to keep giving them the benefit of the doubt is Einstein's supposed definition of insanity.

Elected officials are incentivized to call for calm, procedural responses no matter what

Surely we can accept by now that in fact no, they're pretty specific about when they call for that and exactly how they put it down, and how they pressure victim's families into making hostage statements? None of them called for calm when they were promoting BLM riots, as far too many Europeans and their politicians did!

While #notallimmigrants is true, why would anyone believe that it's more than mealymouthed slop when it's coming from the cultureless, soulless cretins that promote pure propaganda like Adolescence? It's not like this is a one-off, or a tenth-off. It's just the Norm Macdonald tweet, over and over.

It’s hard to make that clear when the very act of calling for restraint is treated as a naked emotional appeal

Is there any evidence that it's not? At some point, they have to do something, ANYTHING, to credibly display that they care more about actual violent crime than about "community relations."

It's hard to make that balance clear when everyone's lying eyes tell them that the ruling class of the UK would rather let low-class girls be raped in perpetuity and a growing number of random civilians be stabbed to death, than to be called racist. Hell, the police would rather let a man bleed to death in the street than help him because he was accused of racism! People like Starmer would, seemingly, rather start slitting throats themselves than restrict immigration at all or change any policy.

15% of the population of Algeria was French in 1962, approaching 60% in some of the cities, after a hundred years of settlement.

Quite a different pattern of involvement and, ah, cultural sympathies at play, though.