Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Redlining with extra steps. Generally a court will see through schemes like this. Unless they don't want to.
Isn't this adjacent to how co-op operate? Co-op buildings or supermarkets.
More options
Context Copy link
What if the difference between what a non-member and good standing member pay is much smaller? The non-member is just charged market value +1%. What is the threshold for the court viewing it as an illegal scheme?
Business are allowed to donate goods/services, universities are allowed to offer scholarships. So why can't a business choose to offer lower prices to people they view as moral and higher prices to people who haven't sufficiently demonstrated good moral character?
If the charge structure doesn't match the Progressive stack it's illegal.
In its simplest form, it would be illegal to charge women more than men, but not the reverse.
Charging women more than men is legal and common- it’s standard practice for things like haircuts and dry cleaning.
Do women get charged more than men when they bring an entirely male-coded set of clothes to the dry cleaner or ask for a crewcut at the hairdresser where you live?
I don’t know what lesbians pay for their haircuts. I do know that barbershops prominently display prices as ‘men’s’ ‘women’s’ ‘kids’.
Femmes go to regular women’s hairdressers, butches usually go to quirky, queer-friendly barbers staffed by tattooed men with beards and lumberjack shirts.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This is not clear to me. My sense is that you could construct a scheme where you can do this. For instance, by a) not using corporate structures, b) using your own money supply, which you mint and control. And worse comes to worse, c) using a different jurisdiction.
...but then you could still be charged with something like racketeering or creating some sort of conspiracy? I don't know.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link