site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1mo ago (text post)   27488 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 27, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

10
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some of our best people like TracingWoodgrains (who is apparently a furry) and Kulak (who is apparently a very attractive woman? wtf) are now posting on twitter for Muskbucks and some like Hlynka have just been banned by overzealous overlords seeking to 'guide' the community

Kulak is a man.

Kulak is not a woman. I think he's trying very hard to create a fake woman thirst trap persona.

It's entirely possible their onlyfans preview pics are AI

But if not, they're either a man with a top notch boob job and naturally pretty feet (also entirely possible) or a woman

Kulak wrote a long essay about why Supreme Commander Forged Alliance was the greatest RTS ever made. On pure probabilities, interest in niche decade-old RTS games has to be amongst the most manly topics. Just look at his twitter and substack: war, evolutionary psychology, Hitler, motorcycles and libertarianism!

I think he hired a chick to play him and terribly read his scripts.

Listen to him on a bailey podcast episode from back in 2020: https://thebaileypodcast.substack.com/p/e016-the-banality-of-catgirls-f65

He has claimed that he used to use a voice modulator to sound male to prove that "she" could make it without being a thirst trap. But that's just track covering. 2020 is before Kulak was down this influencer wanna be rabbit hole and that's just a dudes voice. And it has absolutely no resemblance in cadence or speech patterns to "girl" kulak

Also, no woman ever wrote like Kulak writes ever.

He has literally recruited an OnlyFans model to pose for pictures that he then passes off as himself on Twitter. Kulak himself looks nothing like this woman.

That is the funniest possible possibility, and had not even occurred to me. So the gal in the onlyfans is like a billboard?

She’s partially a billboard/catfish to try and pull in gullible Twitter/Substack subscribers looking to interact with a “right-wing e-girl” and partially just a prop for an extended bit he’s engaged in for his own amusement (and possible self-closeted autogynephilia).

I was under the impression that Kulak, like most people with avatars of attractive women online, is actually a man.

Very well may be, but kudos to the tit doctors if so because s/he has a fantastic rack

Like that hot girl who keeps asking for money, one suspects his pictures are not real.

Kulak (who is apparently a very attractive woman? wtf)

Wait, what? This would shock me if true.

First time I ever opened an onlyfans link in my life just because of the shock

https://onlyfans.com/adelynmoore

I’ve heard his voice before on the podcasts, he’s clearly a spergy man (like most of us here.).

Thank God. My world model can sustain many shocks, but Kulak being a woman would require me to start over from scratch.

I left because I was tired of being downvoted for expressing doubt about Trump. There is groupthink here and it's not necessarily good.

  • -11

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats