@MaximumCuddles's banner p

MaximumCuddles

The world-spirit texting on the toilet

0 followers   follows 4 users  
joined 2022 September 04 18:10:59 UTC

No.


				

User ID: 58

MaximumCuddles

The world-spirit texting on the toilet

0 followers   follows 4 users   joined 2022 September 04 18:10:59 UTC

					

No.


					

User ID: 58

It’s not cargo cult politics, it has precedence in the recent past that still has purchase in the present.

Outside of a pretty narrow bubble, the American electorate doesn’t like communists and doesn’t like communism and those that do will likely never be on my side anyways.

There’s no downside to calling a spade a spade, I’m not sure how more simple this could be.

Almost all of recent American electoral politics seems to vindicate that viciously attacking your opponent works, actually. If you don’t have “cultural supremacy” the way you get it is by seizing or appropriating the megaphones by being ultra aggressive and destroying or undermining their ability to hurt you.

It’s literally why Trump is president, right now. It’s not some theory.

So this does support what I’m saying and I wouldn’t be surprised if you cut the electorate in half and just looked at the top 50% of voters that vote the most often it would be even more skewed against socialism / communism.

Pro-communist Americans live in a nearly airtight informational bubble and they’re so highly over represented in media & education that they started to believe that they really are way more popular than they are.

From a red tribe perspective most of the pro-communist Americans are either such a lost cause that no meaningful political conversion can be had or are a product of such a toxic academic & educational environment that the only way to actually combat them is to destroy the rot at its source: seize endowments, squeeze the institutions, aggressively prosecute rule breakers, etc.

Calling communists out is very good and very productive culture war from the red tribe perspective and its self reinforcing as long as the targets truly have trouble credibly avoiding the accusations.

Actually I’d be willing to bet heavily that the average American normie, even the more peripheral blue tribe normie, still hates communists and has an instinctive negative reaction to things being labeled as communist. The great awokening didn’t go deep enough to completely hollow out Cold War memories or basic intuition about equality and human nature.

As you can see from blue tribers calling anything right of Bernie sanders “Nazi”, name calling and shaming your opponents actually does work if repeated often enough. It works especially if it’s at least sort of or directionally true: a modern progressive hardcore blue triber is much closer to a communist than a Beltway libertarian is to a Nazi, but that never stopped basically all left wing institutions for implicitly or explicitly calling libertarians and centrists Nazis.

Mincing about trying to get the exact precise verbiage to soothe delicate “mmmm acktually!” type light blue or grey tribers who are hyper-sensitive to PMC class anxiety that’s firmly in the hands of blue tribe is a big part of the reason we got here in the first place.

So I reject your entire premise.

Running around calling people “Third Worldists” or “Critical Theorists” or “Queer theorists” or whatever flavor of Marxist inspired leftist ideology that they subscribe to is neither more precise nor more effective. An octopus’ tentacle is still part of the octopus.

This is why, if you want to see less of this, the rational game theoretic response to this is to continue to mock him relentlessly in his death and everyone who mourns him as a retarded communist. Amongst other actions, of course, memetic warfare is no substitute for lawfare and political action.

Unceasing mockery of this farce of a man and the institution he represented is, from my perspective, good and right and quite frankly the crueler and more acerbic the better.

This whole scenario is very “late Soviet Union” in its flavor and I find it to be utterly hilarious in a bitter sense.

Isn’t this basically the origin of the post WWI “stab in the back” myth?

The idea that Germany was actually winning but elements inside the country betrayed the German army.

Thank you that’s very helpful, I’m pretty bad at these sorts of things.

“Handmaid’s Tale is meant to reassure every wretched office-worker who goes home to a cat, a VCR, and Pizza-for-one that her life is noble and progressive. Handmaid’s Tale is fun horror-fiction for women who work in the American-style cubicle-world precisely because it’s so utterly unrelated to the miseries and terrors of their own lives. No one wants to force middle-class American women to have babies. In fact, it’s almost impossible for them to contemplate having kids, because they’re terrified that it might set them back in their careers, and their rivals in the adjacent cubicles would grab their parking spaces and health plans. Nobody wants to use their bodies. That’s precisely the horror with which they live: no one wants to mate with them because in their world, every single striver must fear every other, and the sort of joint action involved in mating and rearing one’s young is impossible, laughable, a thing which only those who have abandoned the hope of A Career can contemplate. So in their minds, mating and rearing children moves down in class, becoming a thing for rednecks and (though they’ll never say this part out loud) immigrants-of-color. The desire to have children gets bounced outside oneself, onto these lesser beings, and returns, courtesy of Atwood, in demonized form, as the tyranny of procreation, family values and the Patriarchy. It’s the horror they love to fear.”

Except from one of my favorite book reviews of all time, from Exiled a defunct Russian online magazine in the year 2000.

Funny enough they made an episode of the TV show recently called “exile” which made searching online for this review extra difficult and I’m almost certain that was done purposely because this review, and in particular this excerpt, has been shared online amongst literary types for years and years.

Took me like thirty minutes to find it when it used to be one of the top links on any search engine.

Edit: @TIRM, I see you’re a man of culture as well.

Ah, I see.

A couple things;

I don’t particularly like or empathize with bear, I think he’s a spineless twerp with lots of personality issues. That being said “Satan, please help me rape my crush” is the most uncharitable take on his actions possible.

He wanted her to love him more than anything in the world, without really taking the request seriously. It was in a fit of desperation he said this thing, there’s no evidence that he thought it was actually going to work otherwise even a loser like him might have worded it differently. He, unfortunately, got exactly what he asked for.

Unrequited love / lust is a pretty common, gender neutral phenomenon that just people will experience in their lifetime, we ha level just been culturally trained to find it toxic coming from a man, and really only recently.

Most people in this situation would experience extreme cognitive dissonance, man or woman. Coming to the conclusion that “I, through a magic item that I don’t and can’t understand, directly caused the torture and annihilation of someone’s else will through unknowingly careless action” is maybe one of the toughest pills anyone could ever swallow, both intellectually and emotionally, and 99% of people would only come to that conclusion until everything else was eliminated.

We know he’s in a movie and he doesn’t; if this thing worked on basically any of us it would take a long time for someone to come to the most painful and “logical” conclusion.

We see him go through every step of this process and by the time he’s finally figured it out and accepted it he’s basically forced to either kill himself or commit murder, both things most people straight up don’t have the balls to do.

He’s not a villain, he’s just a garden variety coward. There’s literally billions of people like that.

She’s not being mind controlled by a man, she’s possessed by malign man-made sorcery.

If she was really under his control she wouldn’t do half the things that she did, he hated it too. He spent like half the movie utterly terrified of her.

“Be careful what you wish for”, a tale as old as time. Well told, for sure, but very well trodden ground.

Yeah the joke is understated on both ends; “insane” doesn’t begin to cover the condition Nikki was subjected to.

Demonic possession more like.

I mean, basically once the bullshit magic trinket actually turned out to be real and he understood it to be the cause of everything, the only way bear could “do the right thing” was to kill himself or commit murder.

Casting him as the villain is an insane reach despite his personal failings or character flaws; he was 100% fucked no matter what.

The director basically just came out and said Nikki is probably going to prison for the rest of her life after the end of the film.

It’s a straight up tragedy, the need to cast either of the protagonists as “the villain” is indicative of how poisoned our gender discourse is and how abominally privileged women are in western society

Your link is broken

Yeah that might have been “meme of the year” for me. I saw the movie and loved it but immediately knew that feminist interpretation of it would be unbearably wrong and annoying.

It’s a horror movie about unwittingly getting exactly what you wished for in a throwaway moment with essentially no recourse to change it.

It’s a simple yet effective straightforward horror movie with minimal subtext, but of course online feminists have to find someway to make the male protagonist take all the blame for what is essentially unknown demon magic and extraordinary bad luck.

Seeing it thrown back at them is hilarious and never gets old.

My favorite tweet about it was in the same genre:

“Horror Movie ideas for 2026. Men: What if your girlfriend was insane? Women: What if you had to be kind to a man you weren’t attracted to?”

Yo dawg I heard you like my opinions

Thank you for bringing me back to this

💎

They’re clearly possessed with the demonic souls of long dead enemy native tribes hell bent on revenge against the USA. Wake up, sheeple!

They’re a pretty good anti-compass for me and mine; what’s generally good for their social position is bad for me and my family and vice versa with the exception of things that are extremely obviously bad for everyone like nuclear holocaust or something akin to that.

Systemically destroying their social power will almost always get my support.

At this point the story of my life involves me going deeper into the woods, only for loud and polluting industries to follow me.

Welcome back, uncle Ted?

My understanding is that pre-civil rights America this was actually beginning to slowly occur before the 1960s did what it did to everything; fucking ruined it.

I mean look at the Scottish enlightenment. They went from knifing each other in mud huts to being the most intellectually developed nation on the world in like four generations.

I’m a big HBD guy but that’s exactly why I’m also a big supporter of Bukele; there’s solutions at scale to the consequences of successive generations of very poor sexual selection effects if you have the balla to actually do something.

One aspect of American society re: blacks reinforces this. My understanding is that the difference between black and white on a whole range of indicators of social health was actually closing before the civil rights era. Things like marriage rates, owning businesses, children out of wedlock, educational achievement, etc.

Then we adopted what might have been one of the most destructive political regimes in America’s history in the late 50s / early 60s and basically just threw a nuclear bomb on the thing every year for the last seventy years.

Bang on.

The hard, reflexive Anti-Trump position tends to rely so much on “Tails you lose, Heads I win” that it barely registers to me anymore, I just assume when most people open their mouths to take these positions they’re engaging in it and I’m rarely proven wrong.

It’s a semi reliable anti-compass at this point; more or less consistently points in the opposite direction of the plain truth.

”Quantity has a quality all its own.”

Very few people are scandalized by anal sex nowadays, it’s the fact that the average gay men has an astronomical amount of sexual partners compared to heterosexual men, and the most sexually active 10% of the population are essentially the male version of Bonnie Blue.

This combined with the prevalence of PreP usage, which is shockingly high to the average heterosexual, are the things that as they become common knowledge dismantle a lot of the “shucks, they’re just like us” line that the 90s and the 2000s cultural era built up so carefully.

In urban settings you can get a blowjob off of grindr faster than you can get a goddamn pizza delivered.

In the 90s and 2000s politically active homophobia used to be basically just the province of right wing religious types, that ship has sailed as we learn a lot more things than we wanted to know about each other via social media. Now it’s increasingly normal for secular people to be disgusted by this sexual culture, even if they keep it to themselves in public.

The whole monkey pox episode was a microcosm of this, once it seemed obvious it was sexual transmitted and certain people couldn’t stop sucking and fucking bareback at an extraordinary rate in order to actually combat the outbreak, it was dropped as a story. But people noticed, and remembered.

My favorite line about hyper partisanship in the social media age when magical “algorithms” are brought to be the ritual scapegoat in the divided society, I simply say “No, we just know a lot more about each other because we volunteer what would have been private or semi-private information freely to huge audiences. Certain groups were encouraged and told no behavior from them can be shameful. So now we know much more about each other and have collectively decided we don’t like each other much.”

Or to put it another way “They’re not confessing, they’re bragging.

Yep! You’ll get no argument from me that it’s overused almost as much the antisemitic tropes it’s being leveled against. People do indeed use the word for cases that don’t fit.

However, the “IDF Training dogs to anally rape Muslims” is almost a platonic example of a modern blood libel. It’s basically a perfect case.

That’s my point.

“Zoophilia: Much more than you wanted to know!”