Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 112
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Can some explain upvotes and downvotes? This might seem like a silly question but I saw someone mention in QOC don’t use downvotes because you disagree.
But what I want to discuss is I never vote. I read and scroll. Stopping to vote just seems like a waste of time to me. Is my behavior weird and everyone else reads a comment and then decides if it’s good or bad?
I assume the voting system here is better than on Reddit and more people vote positively if it’s a good thought versus I don’t like this opinion. But I’m still completely clueless on who the people are who take the time to vote.
I could move this to main board if there is some culturally thing with voting versus fun.
I use votes a lot - it's how I build consensus. How does dropping an anonymous vote into a bucket full of other anonymous votes that people can only see 24 hours after a post and can never connect to any identities build consensus? Nefariously, that's how.
More options
Context Copy link
I upvote if I want to see more stuff like what I just said, and downvote if I want to see less of it.
But the vast majority of comments I read I don't strongly feel one way or the other, so I don't vote.
More options
Context Copy link
I am almost the same. I only upvote if a comment makes me pause and go, "huh, I didn't consider that angle".
More options
Context Copy link
Don't you feel a need to give something back after having read a good post? The tiny bit of moral support given by the very quick and simple upvote is the least you could do.
I like it when people upvote me and I see a lot of likes. To an extent I should vote more.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I sometimes vote if someone has written something I think is insightful. So I do cast votes very occasionally, but they're virtually all upvotes - I basically never downvote or report people for that matter.
More options
Context Copy link
Comments I find boring I scroll past and don’t vote. I upvote/downvote based off a mixture of information/entertainment I get from a comment and how much I agree with it. So a mediocre comment I agree with probably gets an upvote, but a really poorly argued comment, even if I agree with the conclusion, gets a downvote. I’m more restrained about downvotes though, I only downvote if I think someone is very wrong or making really bad arguments.
I don’t think there’s really right/wrong way to downvote as long as you’re not trolling though. People can have lots of different systems of deciding what deserves upvotes/downvotes, but as long as everyone is roughly aligned that upvotes are good and downvotes are bad, the good stuff will always get a lot of upvotes and the bad stuff will always get a lot of downvotes.
This is where I disagree since I believe there is a wrong way to vote and basically all of Reddit is an example of the wrong way to vote. Reddits voting system strongly pushes to censorship and groupthink.
The version of the voting system here or the people here seems to remove that issue.
I think the people here are just a bit less partisan is all.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Casting a vote takes literally half a second.
In most cases, you should be forming your opinion on the goodness or badness (or neutral status) of a comment simultaneously with your reading of that comment, not as a separate decision phase after reading it. If a comment is so profoundly thought-provoking that deciding whether it's good or bad (or not worth voting on) takes a few seconds, then you should not begrudge it that small amount of time.
A suitable response to this passage is an "I'm scrooling!" Wojak image.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link