site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 21, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I might wind up supporting him, but a lot of your information is (at best) misleading. “Moonlighting as a rapper” is actually just occasionally singing the lyrics to Eminem at coffee houses. “Came with nothing” means being a landed aristocratic Brahmin-born engineer with a degree from India. He’s an “accomplished pianist” in the sense that he can hit some keys with graceful mediocrity. I’m too lazy to fact check everything but I’m going to assume large Ramaswathes of it are wrong, and I find the adulation a bit Ramaswarmy.

Funny, and I was intentionally leaning into grandiosity above, but I do think you're underselling things a bit. He actually had a rap persona 'Da Vek' that he wrote / freestyled his own oft political lyrics for in front of large audiences, it wasn't just occasional karaoke -

During his time as an undergrad at Harvard, Ramaswamy had a side-hustle as a libertarian-minded rap artist who went by the stage name “Da Vek" [...] In 2004, he got word that Harvard was doing an open call for student performers to be warm-up acts for Busta Rhymes, who that spring was to perform at the school’s Lavietes Pavilion. Ramaswamy took a shot. It was the first time he tried it. And it worked. According the the school’s paper, 3,000 students attended the event, which was advertised as the “hugest concert in Harvard history.”

The 'accomplished pianist' language comes directly from The New Yorker's profile of him, ymmv with how impressive you suppose that may actually be. Here's a longer video where he seems to be able to play reasonably complex pieces purely from memory - agreed that it doesn't seem like professional level, but surely on par with Clinton's famed saxophone skills at the very least?

(Obviously these are somewhat trivial asides, but I think they reflect a genuine innate multi-disciplinary talent indicative of high g)

As for his parents' financial circumstances, couldn't find much on their background but Vivek and his brother Shankar (a doctor who graduated from Harvard and Brown and also went on to found a billion+ dollar company) went to majority-black public schools in Dayton, Ohio until the violent incident upthread and Vivek talks about how he had to go with his dad to night classes for law school as a kid because his mom worked extra hours and they couldn't get a sitter. Seems like a relatively humble background, at least in comparison to his Ivy League peers, and the extreme upward mobility aspect is undeniable

Are ye all taking OP seriously? I thought it was clearly tongue-in-cheek and indeed was slagging the guy off with the adulation, but maybe that's me reading it through an Irish lens, where this kind of praise would definitely be intended to be read as "this fella thinks the sun shines out of his arse so I'm going to mock him relentlessly".

I keep forgetting that for Americans, all their geese are swans and they'd read this kind of piece as not satirical but genuine 😁

Yeah for a forum supposedly comprised of high-IQ individuals, a little indirect humor seems to go over quite a few heads here. Poe's law and all that, but the OP seems obviously just a kick-off for discussion of Vivek.

“A little”?

The OP was blindingly obvious humor.

Much of the good discussion requires taking it at face value - responding point by point to some of the ridiculous exaggerations, for instance.

But taking the sentiment seriously:

Tonight, mainstream audiences around the nation will be introduced to Vivek Ramaswamy - multi-disciplinary genius, serial entrepreneur, modern renaissance man, and nigh-messianic wünderkind who in this commenter’s humble opinion offers our beleaguered country’s best hope of national redemption

... is ridiculous. No single person is all of those things, on the entire planet.

Maybe I'm wrong and this wasn't meant in jest. But I don't think so.

Let me rephrase.

It was so obviously ridiculous that it made people confused and/or disdainful. "A little" humor is one thing. This much sets off alarm bells for a troll or, possibly, a zealot. Someone who is burying their opinion behind irony and comedy. That's hard to engage with, and it's also not Speaking Plainly™. Just because this guy wanted to imitate the Navy Seal copypasta doesn't mean he's actually looking for a good discussion.

It's less effusive than most "mainstream" media coverage of the Obamas over the last 20 years.

I know you can point to the old “thrill up the leg” and other bits of purple prose, but you’re still being pretty hyperbolic.

To be fair he may have been a lot better in his schooling days. I played for more than a decade growing up and havent touch a piano regularly for years. If i were to play something I would actually choose that exact song and id probably play at his level in the video at best

If i were to play something I would actually choose that exact song

Really? Bach's Prelude in C major from the Well Tempered Clavier is significantly easier to maintain a regular flow in if you haven't played in a long time and sounds nicer too if you ask me.

I haven't played piano in 15 years or more, and the piece I would go for would be Rach prelude op. 3 no. 2. Sometimes familiarity beats everything else?

Yeah, familiarily definitely helps (I personally would go for Liszt's Liebestraum No 3 due to familiarity, plus also the beauty of that piece can be appreciated by everyone, no matter how base they may be), but the prelude is easy enough that you should just be able to sight read it at a decent tempo with high accuracy if you used to be good, and also the arpeggios are such that even if you miss a note for a neighbor it'll still sound OK.

Maybe, but I also see no evidence anywhere that he was ever an “accomplished pianist”. This phrase has a very specific meaning that is unevidenced. It doesn’t mean that you’ve played an instrument for a decade, but have won competitions or appeared in legitimate productions.

Thats fair, and im not saying im was ever at that level either of course. Tho i assume to a normie “accomplished pianist” means playing difficult pieces, not necessarily “next Lang Lang”

Funnily enough it was Lang Lang who cemented Alla Turca’s status as a meme song.