BurdensomeCount
Unable to escape TheMotte's cycle of Samsara...
The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.
User ID: 628
Nothing prevents the employer from offering higher pay to the worker to keep them there. People, especially migrants who are new to the country will place a premium on stability so unless they're being paid significantly under what they could get on the free market and the employer refuses to budge the large majority of them will choose to stay put.
Because turning off the tap doesn't prevent shitty employers from being shitty directly, while introducing proper employment protections and letting migrant workers switch jobs by right does this. Why go for the roundabout way where your stated preferred policy aims may be reified as a second order consequence when you can just legislate for it directly?
I don't give a damn about your reverence for rules or processes. The human intestine is a process, but you don't praise its product: you flush it away.
Upvoted for this alone.
The solution to that problem is to allow H-1B workers to shift employers after say 1-2 years which is how Canada and Australia do it with their permanent residence process, plus put a penalty on the employer if a worker they sponsor leaves a job with them to go elsewhere (like for example restricting them from sponsoring further workers in the short term) to ensure they provide good enough conditions that migrant workers don't want to leave them.
Well this article just also came out: https://www.ft.com/content/db286a0a-ca2d-4791-809e-c9a1ac73b8ad
Archive link: https://archive.is/jSRNH
Chinese tech stocks surge past Nasdaq on the back of AI advance
Beijing’s push for chip self-sufficiency accelerates triumphant comeback for sector
The whole feeling that China has come out on top here isn't on the basis of a single article or anything but rather a more latent sentiment shared by many that the US through their actions delved too greedily and too deep and now have awoken something best left sleeping.
As for me, personally, I just want to face less economic competition from people in general, it doesn't matter to me whether they're US citizens or foreigners.
Fair enough, that's actually defensible. I wouldn't agree with it but at least it is a logical reason.
I really don't want to have to have to compete against a billion Indians
Sure, that's a valid way to feel, but do you equally accept the arguments of liberal elites who want to exclude US citizen conservatives from being able to compete for elite jobs for the same reason, especially when elite overproduction means their children now have to work harder than they themselves had to for these sorts of positions?
I'm not specifying a particular group any more than you're specifying H-1B workers in your example. Would you be just as OK with someone who is a liberal elite and wanted to prevent conservatives (amongst others, like the poor) from being able to compete for elite jobs because that way there's less competition for them and their kids to overcome to get these elite jobs?
What makes you believe it's the Indians causing poor employer behaviour rather than say pretentious US citizen rurals (or conservatives or whatever) who at the moment can also compete freely for these good jobs? Would you be OK with explicit policies that tried to limit their access to "elite" jobs because them trying to supply labour is little different than Indians trying to supply labour?
Your comment is analogous to "I don't want increased opportunities for US rurals because I would prefer, as much as possible, not to compete with other people for jobs which US rurals will do if they are given the same opportunities as me". If a liberal elite made such a comment in regards to elite jobs they'd be raked over the coals in the current zeitgeist and absolutely get called a terrible person.
I mean the whole idea that the correct thing to tax was every single entry of an H-1B worker into the US in the first place is ludicrous. Even if you believe H-1B workers damage the US the amount of damage they cause doesn't change if they take 0 or 4 visits outside the US for holidays/on work/to visit family etc. etc., there's no sensible reason why anyone would decide it's the individual entry of a H-1B worker into the US which causes detriment (not to mention the complete silence on how entries of people who are dependents of the H-1B worker would be handled). Calling the policy half-baked would be doing it a credit.
Indians were much more willing to put up with crappy conditions
If people's true objection to H-1B workers is that they allow employers to get away with shitty employment practices and bad working conditions then the correct way to fix that is to lobby for the government to end at will employment and introduce unfair dismissal/working standards directive regulations etc. like we have here in Europe. That will go a much longer way and be more legally secure long term for ensuring better rights for American workers.
In reality the true reasons why people don't want H-1B are those that (still) can't be talked about in polite society and so we all get put through this charade instead.
Ok, this turns the proposal from an absolute joke into something that you can put a (thin) veneer of respect on, which makes it much more dangerous as it might actually stick.
Of course I'm sure the original proposal from Trump himself was a $100k yearly/each entry fee and now footsoldiers of the administration in their characteristic fashion are trying to sanewash the policy.
FT article this week: https://www.ft.com/content/8fd79522-e34f-4633-bc87-ef0aae2d9159
Archive link: https://archive.is/UKulo
China trials its first advanced tools for AI chipmaking
Two months, it was only two months, and it was reported by the Guardian so I believed it, which is seen as a generally trustworthy source here in the UK (other than the FT it is the paper I regularly read).
If it's a per entry fee it's probably the most retarded policy the US government has had this year, and that's saying something given RFK's antics.
US doctors are already overpaid, they get all the luck while our NHS doctors languish on ~£50k (only hitting £100k when they become a consultant 10+ years after qualifying). At least UK doctor's aren't hit with 6 figure debt though.
Have you seen subcontinental domestic economies? If these people were actually given they full opportunities they deserve and are capable of actualizing then the subcontinent would be at least China level today, instead [redacted because I don't want to get banned immediately after coming back].
This is an annual $100k fee, it's basically telling H-1B applicants they aren't welcome in the US as nobody is going to pay that much extra. Plus it's going to destroy the US international student college market as outside the very top schools a big part of the draw is a chance to work and stay in the US after graduation and nobody outside of Citadel etc. will pay $100k per year in fees for a new grad.
Good boon for the UK/Canada though as it means that instead of American companies hiring in the US they'll instead offshore the jobs and hire here instead. The country can generally do with some of the over inflated US salaries coming over here too.
I feel the US will regret this 10 years down the line, much like how they are now regretting limiting Nvidia sales to China forcing them to build their own homegrown system.
But our trash legal system is also the most imitated in the world, as when it does work
No. Our legal system (England) is the most imitated in the world, almost all of the Commonwealth uses something deriving from it. Your system is a derivative of ours and as one of the things England actually does extremely well I think it is something our country should take great pride in and not let it be appropriated by some 250 year old pretender.
Interesting. Lets wait and see where things settle down. But honestly, the fact that such a story is even believable speaks volumes about the situation on the ground, five years ago this story would have been seen as too absurd for The Onion.
You claim to be a rich Pakistani or something who lives in the UK and despises the native English people which is so on the nose for the place that I honestly think you're probably just some leftist troll getting your kicks here.
I have actually met in person multiple active posters from this site. I assure you I am not lying about who I am. And no, I don't despise the native English.
And no, I am not trolling.
Who said it's bait? Unfortunately I seem to have ended up in a situation where even when I give my genuine views on things I get accused of baiting. "Innocent until proven guilty" is an ancient legal maxim, that applies to all (or should at least, much to Mr. Leon's misfortune).
- Prev
- Next
When the president is saying shit like this all you can do is weep: I hear Cuba doesn't have it because it's very expensive… they don't have tylenol and I hear they have essentially no autism. You'll have to check it out.
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1970244475328016848
More options
Context Copy link