This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why?
Thanks for linking that, didn't know about Superman's name being Jewish. His arguments as to the motivations of his creators seem very well thought out in this comment. What exactly do you disagree with there?
Glad kids don't really give a fuck about Superman anymore after reading that.
More options
Context Copy link
The problem is that "LGBT propaganda" and "propaganda about Jewish cultural influence" are both two very large and heterogenous categories.
Do I have a problem with children reading books which feature gay or lesbian characters? Absolutely not. Do I have a problem with children reading fictional books which feature trans characters? No. Do I have a problem with children reading textbooks that tell them that "sex is a spectrum", that even banal and harmless gender nonconformance may be indicative of transgenderism, that puberty blockers are harmless and reversible, and which more-or-less actively encourage them to seek out invasive irreversible surgical procedures which will render them sterile and unable to achieve orgasm? Yeah, I do.
Do I have a problem with children reading books which (correctly!) point out that Jews are overrepresented at the tops of many industries (like the news media or Hollywood)? I mean, that would make me a little uncomfortable, in the same way that I'm uncomfortable with educational content which aggressively highlights the fact that white people are overrepresented at the tops of many industries and fields. Woke people, as a rule, don't have a problem with that kind of content, so extending the same treatment to Jews would just be an exercise in consistency - "what's good for the goose is good for the gander". Do I have a problem with children reading books asserting that the Holocaust never happened? Yeah, I do.
Frankly, I think the latter kind of LGBT propaganda is far more insidious than the former kind of propaganda about Jewish cultural influence. The latter kind of propaganda about Jewish cultural influence is more insidious than any kind of LGBT propaganda you care to mention.
More options
Context Copy link
I'm pretty far from OPs worldview, and I don't know how to judge which is more insidious, but "Hey little girl, you like playing with trucks? Have you considered a double mastectomy?" feels like it's playing in the same league as "Doesn't the president of the local bank have a funny nose?".
This is an example of a concise and even cheeky comment that is not low effort and actually makes a clear point without being verbose. Just wanted to give credit where due, and also highlight this for those who keep accusing us of modding for verbosity and against brevity.
Yes they are.
https://www.rcgeeks.co.uk/collections/rc-cars-young-teenagers
https://www.very.ie/toys/lego-construction-toys/teen/e/b/11049,22115.end
Enough of them are that toy retailers have designated sections for LEGOs and RC cars intended for teens.
More options
Context Copy link
The argument, in a non-cheeky form, is that young children are pushed towards hormone therapies and surgeries, based on their gender non-conformity. This absolutely is happening, and has the blessing of credentialed experts. Are you saying you're ok with that, and it would only be wrong in the literal case of girls playing with trucks being sent straight to the surgeon?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
You said pretty much exactly what I was trying to say in my reply, using 10% of the words. I commend your succinctness.
Thank you, I strive for efficiency! Though I think longer responses tend to come of as friendlier, and you also supported your argument with a link, so on the other hand your comment made me think I should have put in more effort.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link