site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   35217 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 26, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

or not trying to sleep with a subordinate

One of the reasons I gave up on any career is the realization that no amount of status will compensate for my enormous unattractiveness. If one can't screw young pretty interns, why even bother doing even the bare minimum?

I don't think the interns were put there as a last-ditch motivation attempt for otherwise-NEETs.

No, of course not, they're there for the dirty old men (and women today I suppose) in management.

Because there are plenty of women who are not young pretty interns who are attracted to money and status.

If one can't screw young pretty interns, why even bother doing even the bare minimum?

I'm sure you can think of a couple reasons.

I actually can't. I have no rent or mortgage and I provably can survive on ramen and cheap vodka. I'm against travel on ideological grounds. Entertainment can be pirated. Any other I'm missing?

Whatever ideology it is you care so much about could use a competent champion. To be honest you don't seem like a very happy person to me. If you don't know what it is that will make you happy, giving up and refusing to even search for it hardly seems like the solution.

Going against the juggernaut of an ideology that is progressivism/woke/whatever you want to call it? No thanks. It can make transnational corporations jump. (As an aside, I wish we lived in a cyberpunk world, that'd be an improvement.) I'm deeply unhappy, that's an astute observation. The world is rapidly going to shit, people en masse are espousing something that to me sounds profoundly insane, and something or other is going to kill me soon.

All you do by giving up is guarantee that nothing will change. Pick something small to work on and I'm confident you'll be happier and more satisfied with your life, even if that thing has nothing to do with status or money.

This forum is not a personal blog, but we're low and deep enough by now. There is a feature usually only seen in books and games that I've always wanted in my home. After boozing enough over the course of a week or two I implemented that home “improvement” project. The satisfaction afterwards? Less than an hour total, there are some bottles and some porn I've thought back to for longer by now.

Are you interested in creating entertainment? I see all sorts of ideological and narrative flaws in pretty much all entertainment nowadays--it seems like a reasonably bright person could easily create something better, whether it's a book or a movie.

Let me tell you about tumblr user L.-I. who is one, max two degrees separated from people with tumblr accounts from here. That user takes numerical evidence of being better than other people, like ELO, extremely seriously. Even I, who enjoys to an unhealthy extent an opportunity to feel superior to somebody, find this somewhat obsessive. And one time I made a mistake of commenting under a complaint of being useless as a writer on the account of how few reviews and likes a fanfic received, that the quality of writing is only one aspect, maybe not even the dominant one. There's timing, networking, catering to popular tastes in fandoms and tropes, so on and so forth. The mistake was that, apparently, all that and more had been taken into account already. And still, barely any readers. Tell me Will, if somebody like that writes only for the result to perish unseen when AO3 servers are taken offline, what chance do I have with my stilted words and this tiny comment taking me more than ten minutes to compose?

Edit: and, to be clear, I didn't give up without trying. My latest foray into writing a fanfic got whole whopping 111 views after more than a year. The only question about an original work would be if that figure would be 1 order of magnitude lower, or 2.

More comments

Any idea what you want out of life?

What could you do to be happy 20 years from now with how the last 20 years have been spent?

20 years from now I'm dead. Even 2 seem dicey. And I'm not going to spend them working more than the barest minimum if I can't even get hot sex from it.

Are you uglier than Weinstein?

Ok, you got me there, no amount of status I can achieve without breaking into the upper strata, which requires more politics than straightforward work, with that being something we all motte autists are ill-equipped for. You in particular should know the importance of the right location of a summer house.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats