site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4d ago (text post)   20683 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 21, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Now that it’s news, raising money has become ‘pay five dollars to own the racists’. Distasteful though.

"Own the racist" is a funny way to say "Dunk on the poor victim's cuck father".

Allegedly there is some NGO that goes around coaching/bribing/threatening victims families into saying a bunch of "Let's not make this about race" bullshit. It's quite the contrast to when some black teen commits suicide by cop. But regardless of whether the father's calls for forgiveness, lenience and understanding are sincere or coerced, the degree to which the murderer's family is adding insult to injury should be unforgivable. Not a single ounce of contrition, reflection or humility. I get that people are framing this as the father being a "Good Christiantm", and I'm no Christian myself (yet), but I'm under the vague impression even God requires you to ask forgiveness with some sincerity. It's not just on tap for everyone all the time always regardless of how remorseless or sociopathic they continue to be.

Scott Adam's continues to be correct. It's a hate group, and it's not safe to be around them. If you had doubts before, they are literally putting their money where their poll results are.

I mean, how many of the people donating are white liberals who unironically believe this is a railroading because their brains fell out.

There’s definitely pure ingroup-outgroup blacks, but you ain’t raising money from them.

white liberals who unironically believe this is a railroading because their brains fell out.

They're the only group with significant outgroup bias. And they outnumber black Americans. Naively I would expect most donaters to be them.

I don’t disagree. I’m just saying that now when the whole thing has blown up, donating a little makes the big ‘fuck you whitey’ number go up and is therefore a cheap way of teabagging the outgroup (you and me).

There's both a bunch of NGOs (the father hired one as his publicity agent), and the (edit)US DoJ Community Relations Service , who partner with the NGOs to either start riots or do the "killer is the real victim" number.

It’s the Department of Justice Community Relations Service. It’s rumored they use threats and intimidation to basically force cooperation from the family of the deceased.

Given the Trump administrations' rooting around for left-wing orgs to cut, I'm a bit suspicious that nothing has come out about this if it is the case. They've found much less notable forms of weird behavior.

Trump is not particularly worried about anti-white sentiment, to all appearances.

I mean, I didn't think he had strong opinions on LBJ-era affirmative action EOs either.

It's part of the DOJ, and DOGE clearly went after "independent" agencies first.

You mean the Community Relation Service of the Department of Justice? Paging DOGE, Elon Musk to the whitey courtesy phone...

Thanks, I hadn't finished my coffee and got DoJ and CRS combined trying to write the sentence

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats