This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I wonder about this. Espically because this is a scenario where Elons fate is not even completely in his hands. What happens if DOGE goes as well as it could but it turns out that the GOP figure out in 2028 that MAGA really was just a Trump personality cult and the Dems sweep back into power anyway? Do you think he flees the country? I can't see a world where they don't imprison/Deposses him at least or just kill him.
Dysfunctional infighting between the Texas state government and the federal government that winds up at the supreme court letting Elon off is what happens. Texas may not be a land of enlightened technocrats but it understands perfectly well that sticking up for oligarchs is the best way to get access to their money.
It all depends on how things shake out.The political situation in 2028 is so difficult to predict I do not even bother with the actual prediction just what I think will happen given one of the possible outcomes. I think in the worst case scenario for the conservatives/GOP (IE Trump really is the load bearing figure in the whole movement and it just implodes with him diminished and unable to run again) its very possible the courts are just packed and Texas can't do anything at all. I don't thinks that's likely as I don't think legal action is going to be what happens to Musk but I just don't know.
In practice, democrats getting the kind of majorities that in theory could pack the courts requires getting tons of moderates who would shy away from court packing elected. Now democrats can appoint super partisan judges, but it takes time for the churn to get them the kinds of majorities which allow unbridled lawfare against parties with powerful protectors.
I agree with you 100% I don't think the lawfare angle is likely against someone as powerful and wealthy as Musk. I don't think it would pan out and if it did it would have years and could be undone. I think for a lot of reasons if the Dems come back into power in a big way the "plane crash" , "heart attack" and "car accident" angles are far more likely.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I don’t think Musk really cares that much about that given projection of the future since he considers it probable that the singularity will happen in this term, at least. He’s probably more inclined to believe that Sama beats him to the punch and disassembles his atoms than simply being imprisoned by the next blob-appointed president.
Then it doesn’t really make much sense what he is doing (eg why care about the budget or defanging the bureaucracy if skynet will be here in two years).
Because a better starting point allows the slack to be pulled quicker if you’re not expecting a super-hard takeoff? Although I’m not sure what Musk believes with regard to that.
If you get a singularity soon, then this is all noise.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Elon seems far less on board with the ultra-fast ASI timeline than Sam or the Anthropic guys or even the Deepmind guys and Zuck.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I've had the same thought. I'd say there's a large chance (maybe 15%) that he gets assassinated in the next 4 years. He's taken billions of dollars out of the mouths of extremely corrupt, powerful people. It makes what Epstein did look like child's play. And he hasn't even started with the the DoD yet.
If a Republican doesn't win in 2028, he is toast. And I think it's going to be tough for them. Trump is sui-generis. No one can speak to the rubes like he can.
Musk is more likely to die in jail than in Mars.
Aren't we all?
More options
Context Copy link
I have said before and believe more so now that him going to jail is extremely unlikely. I think if the Dems rally and reorganize enough to take advantage of Trump being gone and actually win in 2028, then their new leadership would be smart enough to aim for the head with regards to Elon and not risk just imprisoning him.
Musk is a difficult target- this isn't joe schmo clinton associate here.
Elon is both not very good as assessing risk to his person and a very loud public figure. Assassinating him would not be very difficult if you had control of the government and a federal apparatus that supports his death.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
And what do you think the result of such an action would be?
Musk gets a page or two in the history books along with thousands of other people across countries and time periods who played the game of thrones, lost and died.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Isn't putting him jail better than killing him since it's a more explicit demonstration of power?
Or is the risk that he would get pardoned and go for another cycle? To prevent that, they might go for the suicide in prison route or torture him via solitary confinement like they did to Bradley Manning and some of the J6 prisoners.
Bingo! Yeah I think history is not really kind to people in the modern era that tried to exile people vs just killing them.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link