This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Cooperation is but a temporary alliance. As Blocked And Reported subreddit, pertinent to the topic, demonstrates, an enemy of my enemy is an enemy of my enemy, no more, no less.
And I think he will ban me for calling him a liar without sufficient evidence.
If anything, it's the "Bet you'll ban me for this post!" gimmick that I find most annoying. Oooh, reverse psychology, however shall I respond?
As for calling me a liar, maybe you really do believe I am lying to myself about wanting to coexist and cooperate with other people rather than stomp on them. In which case, either I am a fool or you are very sad.
What reverse psychology? Calling you a liar without proof is plainly against the rules, the prediction was a simple, though incorrect, statement. However sincerely I believe that only suckers don't seek to dominate other people, and you're clearly not a sucker.
So, were you trying to get me to ban you? Look, "you're lying to yourself" is a little uncharitable and if I really wanted to I probably could have banned you for being a jerk, but contrary to what some persistent pests insist, we don't go looking for reasons to ban people. If you really want to be a bitter cynic, it doesn't hurt my feelings.
Well, I doubt anyone can convince you otherwise, but no, I really don't have any particular desire to "dominate other people" except to the extent that I participate in a society that has to negotiate conflicts of interest and competing priorities, and therefore some people will be winners and some people will be losers, and obviously I'd prefer not to be the latter. But the kind of "dominating" that the brutalists espouse, where I wish to drive them before me and hear the lamentations of their women? No, I don't need that.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Paranoia and Trust are opposites. Trust is required for cooperation. Paranoia prevents it. You are too paranoid.
You cycle alts through here because of your paranoia.
We don't trust you in turn because the small request we have of users which is to maintain a consistent face/username is something you won't do.
Society is an iterated prisoners dilemma. You have chosen to hit defect on the assumption that everyone else will do so as well. You'll never be proven wrong, because you have defected first and most people run a tit-for-tat strategy.
"When a fight is about to break out, make sure to strike first. How do you tell when a fight is about to break out? Easy, it will once you've struck first" - (c) Putin according to internet memes.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link