site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 30, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also, I am a bit skeptical of this whole "from clueless windows admin to in-demand cloud specialist in a few months" story. I mean, you can train a button pusher to push new buttons, but at the end of the day you will still have a button pusher.

Running a standard cloud installation is button-pushing. Building and running a nonstandard/bespoke datacenter, even if unwise, requires a lot more ability. So it's not a surprise the people doing the latter were able to learn to do the former. Now they're still high-ability, but know how to push an additional set of buttons, so they're worth more than either your run-of-the-mill button-pusher or what they were before.

running a nonstandard/bespoke datacenter, even if unwise, requires a lot more ability.

Total tangent, but a good story.

Early in my career, I was in a low level position that randomly physically placed me in the same room as four high-end infra guys. These dudes had been building complex system for decades and really knew their shit. They had a lot of opinions.

Two of them came up with a very nonstandard and bespoke way to manage the huge cluster we were running. The other two came up with a different very nonstandard and bespoke way to manage the huge cluster we were running.

The first group worked for at least the two years I was there to get permission from the higher-higher-higher ups to implement their solution. IIRC, they built like a mini deployment using old servers to demonstrate the feasibility. They wrote innumerable contingency and rollback plans. I left before it went live, but I heard they, eventually, got permission for a scaled down version of what they wanted. I think they got a kind of pat-on-the-head employee-of-the-month reward, as well as a paid trip to some cloud infra conference.

The second group left, raised some money for their idea, and then got their shit deployed across all of the operations of a massive specialty data center company. They're both giga-rich now with multiple layers of fuck you money.

To me, this is the triumph of markets of an individual firm. If your firm doesn't like your idea, but you have high enough conviction, it could be worth risking it to try to get your idea out there. Now, the odds of success are against you, but I find it far more disheartening to have the eventual mitigated success of the first two guys, rather than a potential start-up flame out.

The second group left, raised some money for their idea, and then got their shit deployed across all of the operations of a massive specialty data center company.

I design things. Anything I design on company time is company IP and supposedly they'd sue me if I left to make my business selling their IP.

Now, the odds of success are against you, but I find it far more disheartening to have the eventual mitigated success of the first two guys, rather than a potential start-up flame out.

Risk vs. Reward and all that, right? If I'm at a point in my life where I'm not responsible for others and have a bit of a safety net, the gamble is a great idea. If I'm the sole provider for others, well... maybe sticking with the safer route is better for me and those that rely on my income.