site banner
PaperclipPerfector  5d ago (text post)   17761 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 23, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Humans only developed the ability to form social groups because it benefitted gene proliferation.

Did they?

Why should I think twice before nutting in a hot Bay Area Indian to produce an Anglo-South Asian 145 IQ super hybrid? My seed will not be denied its evolutionary longing!

Personally, I am against any politics that prevents me from fucking hot Indian women. Sorry white race, or America, or whatever... I care more about fucking hot women than I care about any of those things. As indeed I should. After all, the white race itself is the product of race-mixing thousands of years ago, as are all other races. I trust that my libido knows what the right thing to do is when it comes to these things.

hot Indian women.

Source?

This is all personal preference, which I readily admit. But, I'll take a mid white girl so long as she isn't over weight to a "10/10" Indian woman. I've never found them attractive.

Different strokes for different folks. I like their brown skin, the jet black slightly curly hair, the mix of a sharp almost aquiline nose with full sensuous lips, and their tendency to have large breasts. The ones I come across, probably because of selection pressures, also tend to be smart. It's probably similar to why I have a tendency to get with Jewish women - they tend to be smart and with a certain ethnic sensuousness to their looks. For whatever reason, I've never been super-drawn to the stereotypical Nordic blonde type of white woman. I find them attractive, but they don't do it for me on a deep level like Jewish girls, Indian girls, Italian girls, and so on.

You didn't need to reply to my comment, weeb, nobody cares.

"sensuous" is a made up word. John Milton hacked it together because he was an incel weirdo.

Returning to your comment, you've just told an internet cafe of strangers what you like about the things you like. Wasteful.

  • -17

@Goodguy's preemptive appreciation notwithstanding, what the hell is this post?

You write a lot of AAQCs, and then you apparently decide to "cash them in" with posts like this, and I've told you before to stop doing that.

Banned for 2 days so maybe you will believe me. No, this site does not need "petty bitching" and "spice" to improve the flavor.

"sensuous" is a made up word. John Milton hacked it together because he was an incel weirdo.

False, the word seems to have come about in the late 18th century.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Sensuous&year_start=1500&year_end=1800&corpus=en&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false

Opinion discarded.

Found in Milton's "Of Education", published 1644 (mid-17th century).

I guess I'll have to take the L on this one.

Ask pointless question.

Get pointless answer.

No! Not like this.

I like this kind of petty bitching. Without a bit of it to spice things up, this great site would be somewhat too flavorless.

Under the assumption the h1b visa program actually does that, go for it.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats