This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is one of those leftover Redditisms that just refuses to die.
No, actually, the religious people advocating for the unborn actually do also do a TON of work for all sorts of people. The society of Saint Vincent De Paul, for instance, or Covenant House.
Because: these people are actually consistent in their beliefs. They care about people, including the unborn, and dedicate substantial parts of their life and work to caring for them. All that stuff they talk about at Mass every Sunday, they actually believe it. It’s not for show.
This is true. It is also true that there are a lot of people (according to both my casual observation, and traditional Protestant doctrine on this point, far more than the first group) of unsaved sinners who tick the "Christian" box on the census as a way of expressing their secular tribal identity, but do not accept Jesus Christ into their hearts as their Lord and Saviour. And that group are somewhat involved in anti-abortion activism, and not at all in any of the other stuff. In the American political context, this group of "Christian" hypocrites is particularly significant because they vote and thus a major political party exists to represent their interests.
So the correct Arminian interpretation of Barnhart's sermon is "If your Christianity is causing you to advocate on behalf of the unborn, but not any of the other disfavoured groups that Jesus mentions in the Bible, then you are doing Christianity wrong and need to do some repenting" and the correct Calvinist interpretation is "If you see a group of self-identified Christians advocating on behalf of the unborn, but not any of the other groups Jesus mentions in the Bible, then you are looking at a group of fake Christians."
More options
Context Copy link
I imagine it's meant to be an attack on the average anti-welfare GOP politician, not on (mostly) Catholic charities.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link