@Botond173's banner p

Botond173


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

				

User ID: 473

Botond173


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 473

In this telling, it's very much a "is there anyone you forgot to ask" situation, where third parties are inserting themselves into something that they have no business inserting themselves into.

Well sorry but no. A queen bee who's heading a sorority presumably with high status on campus has an evident interest in preventing that sorority from gaining the reputation of being associated with crazy sluts.

Don't you think that there is too high a bar for this level of conspiracy and coordination in this particular social setting?

"we're shutting down whatever the fuck this is" part

Another commenter noted that she's supposedly a jacked female bodybuilder. If this is the case I'm guessing the dude who shut it all down did so partially because he was just weirded out by the spectacle.

it was the men who were not taking responsibility for their choices

The responsibility to do...what? Other commenters here have pointed out that the disinvitation to the Halloween party obviously seems to originate from the sorority queen bee. Were they responsible to defy her in this?

So to spell it out, in your view it was the unmet specific obligation of the fratboys involved to carefully conceal the incident from a) the sorority queen bee and her minions b) clueless male students of the same college whom the woman in question sees as potential future boyfriends/husbands.

It's fair to say that sex is almost never transactional for men whereas for the average woman it's more the norm and not the exception.

T supplements would indeed explain a lot.

Treating them shabbily is in very poor taste.

Is this a reference to the dis-invitation to Halloween?

One interpretation I've read is that this phenomenon was driven just as much by the women. Hippie couples would join a commune and the women would go on to compete for the sexual attention of the commune leader. When the men objected the women would go on to complain of their "possessiveness".

Others saw an opportunity to exploit her experience for their own gain, and pushed her to "reinterpret" the situation to advance their agendas.

What do you mean?

Unfortunately the social reality is that 'being considered a slut by her sorority' is a fatal tragedy in the eyes of the average female college student who, on the other hand, has been indoctrinated from her youth, as have been her parents, that trying to sexually shame women for anything is absolutely taboo.

Let's not get carried away here. If this woman wanted to get gangbanged by men outside her immediate social circle at college so that her reputation doesn't suffer it was well within hear means to make that happen.

Admittedly a lazy question but here it goes anyway: in the earlier discussion on this incident that took place here one highlight/moment that was mentioned was that this woman, supposedly already drunk and drugged out of her mind at that point, accepted a proposal from two guys to have a threesome, apparently under the assumption that this will actually entail her getting to watch homo sex happening. I imagine her disappointment contributed to her regretful recollection of that night’s events afterwards. One one hand I think this should be cause for a conversation on the brain-rotting effects of prevalent literary porn consumption among college-educated single women. On the other hand, is this even getting commented on?

It seems the sort of juvenline prostitution he describes depends entirely on plausible deniability. Marking the affected street with yellow pretty much removes that, and we know how susceptible young women are to social pressure.

Was this woman the only woman at that party at the frat house that night?

That would be the equivalent of an open admission that the grand Western feminist social experiment has failed.

Admittedly a lazy question but here it goes anyway: in the earlier discussion on this incident that took place here one highlight/moment that was mentioned was that this woman, supposedly already drunk and drugged out of her mind at that point, accepted a proposal from two guys to have a threesome, apparently under the assumption that this will actually entail her getting to watch homo sex happening. I imagine her disappointment contributed to her regretful recollection of that night’s events afterwards. One one hand I think this should be cause for commentary on the brain-rotting effects of prevalent literary porn consumption among college-educated single women. On the other hand, is this even getting commented on? Are these two sources commenting on it even?

It strikes me as evident that Russian society does not normalize ethnomasochism among the majority population and is not culturally and politically beholden to the Israel lobby. I’d argue those are rather big differences. To the extend that the social pathologies you mentioned are prevalent in Russia I’d argue those are the long-term and by now irreversible consequences of Bolshevik attempts to force through a cultural revolution during the first two or so decades of their rule.

The Hungarian economy is indeed „Russian-aligned” in the sense that its main source of imported crude oil and natural gas is Russia which has been the case ever since those imports have become necessary – in other words, from the beginning. And this hardly makes it an exception in that region. With regard to natural gas the only alternative that was ever on the table was import from Iranian and Azerbaijani sources facilitated by the Nabucco Pipeline; the sources on this pretty much agree that it was mainly American pressure that drove the whole project to be shut down. Had it ever become reality I leave it to your imagination what depending on Iranian gas shipments would mean in the current world economy. With regard to crude oil the only alternative on the table is the Adria Pipeline connecting the country to the Croatian coastline which has never been tested to its full capacity. Whose oil would get pumped through it as long as the war in the Persian Gulf continues? You tell me.

Pretty soon I saw teenagers putting "No Enemy" stickers everywhere

I'm clueless. What was this about?

I'm guessing OP's point isn't that Bush should have declared a global crusade against Islam, it's that he basically went overboard by calling Islam a religion of peace, that it was needless and there was no political justification to do it. It's best to do anything in moderation even in politics.

True - (regular) Reddit commenters are a tiny minority. But that doesn't necessarily mean their views are fringe. We can merely infer that they feel unusually strongly about those views and thus feel compelled to keep declaring them. It's entirely conceivable that huge numbers of average people agree with them while not feeling any particular inclination to howl this into the virtual wind. And this probably applies to feminist beliefs in particular. I'm afraid a single man lurking around a female-coded hobby group and basically infiltrating it in order to find women to approach online will not be looked upon positively among normies at all if exposed, even if none of those normies ever commented on Reddit.

Why are you assuming the two groups are radically different?

Doesn't all this normally count as online stalking/harassment in the eyes of normies?

I think it's more accurate to say that upper middle-class established men care about the social status of their marriage partners.