site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 5, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My theory is that women in general have a significantly lower sex drive, and that it might be a completely different kind of mechanism compared to the male one.

I've known plenty of women who've gone without sex for years and basically didn't really find any need to fix it. And the ones who have a lot of it often use it as a way to obtain in-group status, not for the physical act itself.

As an 16-25 year old man, all you need to connect the dots is to realize none of your female friends masturbate on a daily basis or have frequent sexual thoughts about their friends or classmates. Then it becomes completely obvious that something quite different is going on in their heads.

Bonus: women are almost universally unaware that any such difference exists. A real, visceral difference. Imagine a race of people who never went hungry, but still consumed food out of social pressure. They wouldn't be aware that others have different motivations for eating, and would think they're also just "doing it for vibes"

This is directionally true but a bit of an overgeneralisation given that eg dildos exist - there are genuinely horny women out there

there are genuinely horny women out there

But this, evolutionarily speaking, has been selected against for in women for all of history except for 20 of the last 70 years. Before that, the Pill and condoms didn't exist; after that, a still-uncured, incredibly destructive STD (among other things).

This is probably why the number of genuinely horny women is in deficit compared to its supply, at least, from the version of "horny" men understand. I'm pretty sure the analog to superstimulus titty anime is K-dramas.

A while back I made a controversial comment that was along the lines of "When women dress sexy, they don't really understand what it's signaling to a guy. They want to be beautiful, like a sunset, and these are the clothes society is telling them makes them beautiful." A lot of men have a hard time believing it, but it really does tie in to a completely different understanding of sex between the sexes.

Women know the difference between dressing sexy and dressing beautiful and they very deftly choose which kind of signal they want to send all the time. If they didn't they wouldn't be able to accuse other women of dressing like whores or realize when their daughters need to change their clothes before going out.

Only very stupid or very young women wouldn't be able to figure it out. The reactions of other women help them learn even more so then the male reactions.

I did say it was a controversial comment. I am a woman and I can tell you that dressing "sexy" versus dressing "beautiful" is like trying to look pretty like a sunset or look pretty like a flower.

I can tell my six year old not to wear tights and a t-shirt because I understand that this is inappropriate with the rules of fashion, not because I understand what it is to look at a six year old with sexual lust. But as the rules of fashion change so goes clothes, and my kids have "jeggings" they can wear under both dresses and shirts, which makes it easier to let them pick their own clothes for now.

Yes, women understand that they are sending different signals when they dress. They understand that this cardigan makes them look smart and serious, this skirt makes them look fun, etc.

But they don't understand sexual hunger and how they dress impacts it. We witness patterns and try to act accordingly, but we don't grok the underlying mechanism, so sometimes we think we understand a pattern but a man behaves differently than we expected. This explains a lot of the disconnect between women thinking men act creepy, and men thinking a woman wearing only half an outfit must be down for a good time, and if she rejects the man it's because he's not hot enough.

But they don't understand sexual hunger and how they dress impacts it.

I don't agree women are so blind, even if you are a woman yourself.

The girls showing off their assets to simps online know perfectly well what sexual hunger is and how to stoke it. They didn't learn it from some secret e-thot grimoire. There's tons of male gaze materials online to learn from.

Maybe they don't understand that intuitively, but it is certainly an attainable skill.

https://www.themotte.org/post/1121/culture-war-roundup-for-the-week/241478?context=8#context is a recent example of what I mean. A woman assumed bras make breasts more sexy, and the only benefit to modesty was they reduced the visibility of hard nipples. She made these deductions through observation, and thought she understood the rule. But now a bunch of men are telling her that bras actually make breasts less sexy.

Sure, a woman can learn to be a stripper. But my point is that most women you meet are not intentionally sending Fuck Me signals through their dress, and would be alarmed to realize the intensity that Fuck Me signals can cause in a man.

Okay, this is probably a weird question. But your view is that a lot of women don’t understand the signals their dress is sending or the intensity of Fuck Me signals. I think you’re probably right.

What shaped your views in a different direction? Did you have personal experiences, did you read a bunch of stuff, did you just intuit it? I just get curious about the etiology of different worldviews. (And to be transparent, because we agree but a lot of people disagree with us, I’m hoping maybe we can learn how more people could come to agree.)

I think the Internet is a huge leveler. Men talk about their experiences openly. It didn't take long before I noticed that what men feel when they look at an attractive woman is different from what I felt when looking at an attractive man. For a few years I decided I was asexual, but I am happily married with four kids, so that label probably doesn't actually apply to me.

Even with the Internet, I still don't think I understood. People like to say that the Internet is not real life, and to some extent that's true (but if lots of people on the internet talk about red and green like they're different colors that you don't perceive, eventually you might start to understand that you're colorblind.) I understood that the porn-sick, perverted men of Reddit were very visually attracted to women, but that wasn't evidence that the Respected and Trusted men of my life, who share my workplace and classrooms, also reacted that way.

I waited for marriage. While my husband hadn't made the same choice, he was very respectful of my choice and saw himself as a guardian of my conscience. One day I wore a dress that was sexier than usual. I thought that was just what women did when they had boyfriends. To me, it was just a style that signified that I loved him. He responded differently from what I expected. He told me that, if I cared for him, I shouldn't wear that dress until we were married and wanted sex right then and there. I was embarrassed, but also it was a huge click for me.

I was reading your comment while taking the subway today. And there was this woman, wearing super professional attire (white blouse with no cleavage, light makeup, sensable hairdo). Except that she was also wearing a super short skirt with a slit up the middle, almost as if she was trying to show off her crotch.

It was... confusing. This was a weekday morning, so I assume she was going to work? I doubt she was going clubbing or anything at that time. But it really just made it awkward for me as a man to even look in her general direction. So I appreciate your comment, because I was genuinely wondering "is she doing that on purpose, or is she just clueless about how she looks?"

It also made me think of this star trek TNG episode where Picard is carrying a sexuality symbol without understanding what it means, and the local women keep approaching him, and he's like "dammit just leave me alone I just want to read my book in peace!!!" Quite the communication error.