site banner
erwgv3g34  10mo ago (youtube.com)   4203 thread views

Kevin Dolan - 2023 Natal Conference: "In our lifetime, every government, every culture, every belief system, and every family on Earth will pass through a bottleneck -- a bottleneck tighter than the Black Death, predicated on one question: will your children have children of their own?"

youtube.com
15
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does he have written things?

He has a blog called Bennett's Phylactery. I really liked "You’re Going to Be Doxxed", "Evils & Designs", and "Breeding Our Way Out".

I read the first one and it's really just the usual paranoid, millenarian boo-outgroup screed I've seen from rightists about a million times now. A far cry from early Scott.

the enemy has transmogrified from self-dealing hustlers & zealots into a cabal of literal blood-drinking pedophile satanists in command of the entire Western order

As the divide becomes more dangerous, They will be more insistent to know which side you’re on, & institutions with the power to reveal that knowledge will lose the pretense of impartiality.

You know what is coming for this culture. It’s going to be destroyed - & long before it is destroyed, it’s going to become an unbearable hell. Maybe you were hoping to time your exit, make a little more money, watch a little more Netflix, eat a little more plastic meat - but maybe your plan would have come too late. If God calls you out of Babylon ahead of schedule, you don’t ask questions & you don’t look back.

Maybe the others are better.

Scott has committed to not doing boo-outgroup against his ingroup no matter their epistemic evils and to writing subpar propagandistic slop, and eventually was rewarded with an incredible mainstream reputation and traditional marriage and children. With his children growing up, he will drop cringey Fristonian analogies and «rediscover» traditional religion too. Truly, the dream life of any trad. Makes his paranoid freakout about the NYT that much more embarrassing.

It is not very interesting that people outside his ingroup experience life differently.

This thread is about early Scott who wrote a lot of criticism of the in-group that's pretty far from propagandistic slop or boo outgroup, so I basically don't know what relation your comment has to what I said.

Maybe the others are better.

I only read the last one. I'd not rate him anywhere near Scott, but he's reasonably smart and the third essay is very much worth reading.

Even that one veers into fantasies about confiscatory taxes, conspiracy, and collapse.

Tax debates in our lifetime have mostly been about the moral rectitude of redistribution — what’s “fair” or what people “deserve” — but for our grandchildren, it will be a question of who lives and who dies. The young will not be able to support their own families alongside dozens of unrelated dependents, even as far as the basics of food and shelter.

Paradoxically, this will unfold in a world with abundant land and capital lying unused, because there will be so few competent, able bodies to operate it. Survival will be a straightforward matter of saying “no” to all of these demands — building for your own people, and protecting what you build.

Unsourced tweet from dprk enjoyer about Amish cell phones

for the powers we wrestle against, sterility is the point.

Like I said, downright millenarian.

Once you understand the 'Social contract' in shrinking societies, 'Day of the Pillow' or more likely 'Just letting state pensioners slide into utter poverty' starts looking downright appealing.

/images/17057029934202542.webp

There's some truth to the meme, but unlike in Europe, in the US the social security age is raised on a regular basis without everyone flipping out and burning busses. Finances are also not the reason that people aren't having kids, it's entirely cultural and the fact that people simply prefer the DINK lifestyle. Per capita income tax is recently high but until covid has been flat for 20 years. https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much-money-does-the-government-collect-per-person/

And certainly nobody is going or will go hungry or homeless due to taxes, what a ridiculous exaggeration.

I think the first paragraph you cite makes a lot more sense together with the second:

But you still call them names & waggle your dick at them online, out of habit. You definitely don’t treat them like they’re possessed of infinite supernatural malice, & have the power to publicize everything you’ve ever watched & said & done on the internet.

The other two paragraphs are definitely overly paranoid, especially the last, but surely some level of paranoia is warranted at this point.

I do find the other two essays much higher quality than that one.

Adding that paragraph just makes it more paranoid and boo outgroup, especially since he takes the "infinite supernatural malice" ball and runs with it.

I don't know what to say except that it doesn't read that way to me.

Holy crap, thanks for linking this guy. Do you know anything about the exit group he seems to have started?

It's on his twitter profile.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats