This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There's something so comically simple and innocent about full-on transformations, for me. Like a 6 year old that really wants to be a T-Rex or a sentient tank, and would go full hog if given the opportunity, physical consequences be damned. Wholeheartedly rejecting your human vessel to be something else entirely because 'fuck yeah'.
But being a big-breasted female-presenting tiefling with a futa cock and dude voice? Feels like a strange midpoint. If you live in a world of magic and this can be done easily with a finger snap or a procured service, why wouldn't you go all in one way or the other? I'll admit to a possible failure of imagination on my end, but it just comes off as kink and fetishism. I'm sure there's some fucking official lore about how everybody in FR is pansexual and sexually super liberal (because the author just said so!) and so none of this is strange in-universe, but I think it just renders the whole thing silly and alien.
Any way, I know nothing of the DnD universe other than Planescape Torment and less than a handful of fun birthday party sessions that were never intended to be continued past that single night. But Spider Guy is intelligible to me in a way Ms Potato Parts isn't.
If you live in a world of magic and this can be done easily with a finger snap, why wouldn't you go for kink and fetishism?
It's not a finger-snap - it's serious magic.
As in, absolutely out of reach of normal people unless they manage to piss off the right archmage, be a dumb mage and read the wrong ancient scroll or find the (cursed) belt of gender-reversal.
More options
Context Copy link
As I said, perhaps I lack imagination. I wouldn't go for kink and fetishism, but then I'm not particularly kinky and lacking in abnormal sexual predilections. Perhaps this would not be so if I lived in FR where there were no constraints? Maybe, but that's a setting I can't relate to and ultimately find silly. It could make for something interesting if a work really grappled with the implications of that kind of subject matter, but I assume it's unlikely to come from works that consciously choose to wear the trappings of Tolkien-esque fantasy but pile on the zany. It's a world where magical power could accomplish anything, and yet the setting is still stuck largely with medieval tech trees, politics, clothing, and whatnot due to genre conventions. Fine for a board game, but not something I feel like spending 80 hours in.
I guess my question would be - is there any purpose to the futa outside of kink and fetishism? Are lesbian couples ocassionally using a 'cock spell' just to mix it up in the bedroom to fend off boredom, or are they transforming themselves and performing daily mundane tasks with a permanent penis attached because that's what they truly identify with? And if that's the case, why the remaining attachment to keeping one's breasts? What the hell even are identities in a setting where you can be anything? What does the mental model and its motivations look like? How much of this, if any of it, should be considered a reflection back on the real world? And maybe the right answer is "None of it at all, it's fantasy", but I think that ship already sailed a while ago what with the increased prominence of trans characters in media being justified as a moral good in and of itself.
If it's just being done for kink and sexual exhibitionism, does this pattern-match to trans people IRL? I feel that many trans people would object to such a characterisation, because they feel their gender identity is more than just the organs they use for bumping uglies. I also suspect that many of them would take a magic pill that fully transforms them to their opposite sex if they had the opportunity, but currently have to settle for stopping somewhere on the their journey due to constraints of modern medicine and practical realities (fear of surgery, lack of funds, not impressed enough with available transition procedures, etc). So how does that work in FR?
And I don't really expect good answers to my incohesive series of rambling questions, because 1) This is a rule of cool, 'X is for everyone' setting that establishes norms and tabboos by author fiat, and 2) This topic is an unresolved mess of contradictions in the real world as it is. I actually feel slightly ridiculous writing this out.
I mean, I do think that ... like, if you can go futa, you can go anywhere; it's hard to see why such a world wouldn't collapse into a Slaaneshi fuckpile pretty much overnight. To have a sustainable futa population requires the populace to go: "Alright! Chicks with dicks... but no farther!" Which is indeed quite implausible.
I mean, I guess what I'm saying is just, don't underestimate the lengths people will go to for kink and fetishism. Having kink and fetishism drive a major component of your life like permanent or prevalent body type is not at all implausible to me.
As an AGP, I am the wrong person to ask about this. I guess I'd say, I don't know because the current cost of entry is so enormously high, and also because perversion is still stigmatized. I think "doing it because you find it hot" is a very underestimated motivation, even in trans circles, but it's not one you're allowed to admit to right now, in part because SRS and trans in general draws on limited societal resources. Idk, I'd say give it a year past the singularity and we'll have a lot better idea where people "naturally" land once scarcity of body is removed.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
My understanding of Ed Greenwood's notes (which are, by contract, canon even if unpublished) is that you're not even remotely wrong.
To put it mildly.
...
Not exactly "liberal" - incest as harmless "family fun time" and regular wild orgies on the rooftops is not (yet) something to seen as progressive in the current year.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link