site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   38486 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 5, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that your substack, or did you just find the article interesting? Are you going to respond to any counter arguments if someone addresses any part of this post?

Did anyone archive the post or the link?

Edit: Was it this one?

No, it was this one: https://johnganz.substack.com/p/the-browning-of-the-right

The post was just a copy-paste of the article.

You're probably replying to GPT-generated bullshit.

This is what I hate about AI. I don't think we're going to be paperclipped and I don't think we're going to live in post-scarcity riches and luxury. But every second comment now on social media is "Did AI write this?" or "Sounds like AI wrote it" or even "I bet AI wrote this, it's so good!" and "I wish AI would write movie script/comic book/commentary piece".

Were there no humans churning out stupid crap before ChatGPT? Was nobody producing reasonably creative work? If we're no longer going to believe that we are interacting with other humans on the basis "this comment is so terrible it must be AI", then what is the point?

Were there no humans churning out stupid crap before ChatGPT? Was nobody producing reasonably creative work?

It'll be a sad when it turns out that modern human beings won't even be able to pass the Turing test. But my expectations have never been lower.

Virtually every technology out there is always sold on the idea that, it'll be great for humanity on the basis of X, Y and Z; but it's always only ever been marketing garbage. All the 'virtues' and 'wonders' and highfalutin bullshit of these technologies always only ever end up being a footnote and and afterthought to their 'real' uses. Plagiarism, social isolation, degradation of community, and mindless consumerism, to name a few.

Idk, I'm quite fond of refrigerators and dishwashers myself.

It is the new “must be a Russian bot”

shit-stirs in replies, but doesn't address any replies to the shit-stirring. And has a month-old private account. That's always a good sign.

It's the same guy who's been banned numerous times. He posts bait and far right inside baseball while pretending to oppose it.

Here's the last time, which coincidentally is close to the birthday of this present iteration.

I quite like this guy’s posts, I have to say. If they’re bait, they’re good bait that actually refers to a lot of interesting things happening in online dissident right politics, which is a very interesting topic of discussion.

Yeah, we could go back to the previous state of affairs, which was an ever declining number of posts about “my office just implemented a new DEI policy, I’m going to post about how angry it makes me on my favorite forum”, the usual suspects complaining about juice, news articles with the minimal acceptable amount of commentary, or the occasional effortpost about something interesting but only tangentially related to the culture war, but this is an interesting addition.

Seconded. I thought this was a good discussion starter.

Ah... Glad we're still extending endless charity to obvious trolls so that we can slam regulars with the banhammer.

You disagreed with Count’s ban?

Yeah, getting banned for saying "who gives a shit" seems excessive. He wasn't actually aggressive to the other poster.

Edit: wait he was banned for a week?! I thought it was for a day, that is outrageous and I'm not criticising someone who can't respond.

It's good for the soul.

Thus has it ever been ;-)

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats