site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   38488 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 5, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You’re wasting your time, people on the motte are very blackpilled and demoralized to the point they can’t see a win as a win.

Because motteizeans are not, on average, any more red tribe than the people imposing Covid restrictions even if they agree ideologically.

They are a helpless bunch, looking for any excuse to do nothing. When you tell them they may have to sacrifice something to express themselves against the government, out come the stalin analogies. They want the government to read their minds and execute perfectly at zero cost to themselves. They’re the traumatized girl who just couldn’t find the courage to say no.

The original policy papers on pandemics said ‘The people will never accept lockdowns’. Those who opposed them but didn’t protest in some way have massively empowered the government they seemingly despise. Then they complain that they get ignored. The government is right to ignore opinions that aren’t backed by anything. You get the government you deserve.

Those who opposed them but didn’t protest in some way have massively empowered the government they seemingly despise.

Those who protested got shut down, harshly and often violently; they were then hounded later even after being beaten in the moment. Complaining that people didn't protest and that's why the government can ignore them is blatantly ignoring what actually happened.

So those fines are the extent of the stalinist repression you can’t take? All the fines over all the protestors, that must be like 2 dollars. You can’t spare 2 dollars to express your anti-lockdown views?

The fines aren't the only thing they did. They also took his business and threw him in jail. The hounding later just shows that they hold a grudge, and once you start with the government, the government will never be done with you. And of course he's not the only one NJ punished for protesting; the state regularly broke up protests and arrested protestors. Pretending the state was "empowered" by lack of protest is just rubbing salt in the wound; the state has real power, the kind that flows from the barrel of a gun.

Dissidents have historically faced far worse outcomes than this. Even this way of putting it considerably understates the discrepancy. This is lower than suffragette level of protest repression.

You’re encouraging political disengagement by pretending the state is an undefeatable force. That’s a message dictators put out because they are empowered by that belief, and our government is too. Of course, the dictators are lying and never as secure as they claim.

As long as the government thought the people would protest lockdowns, they wouldn’t implement them. Only when most people turned pro-lockdown, and the opposition to it was muted, did they do so. So this force, as powerful as it might be, is to a large degree controlled by the people, their opinions and actions.

You’re encouraging political disengagement by pretending the state is an undefeatable force.

You're encouraging tilting and windmills by pretending it works, and sneering at anyone who points out that tilting at a windmill won't do anything but hurt the jouster.

As long as the government thought the people would protest lockdowns, they wouldn’t implement them.

They implemented them, then they arrested, fined, and in some cases (even in the West) shot the protestors.

So you can’t win the smallest battles, you’re always losing, and you’re never going to do anything. Is that your plan?

I don’t think the limited protests we saw were nearly enough to constitute a clear message of ‘the people don’t accept lockdowns’ in line with the expectations of pandemic policy writers (or my own) . Some level of repression is par for the course. Just accept that you might take a punch or two, unless you want to keep letting rednecks fight your battles for you.

So you can’t win the smallest battles, you’re always losing, and you’re never going to do anything.

I'm not going to run into a buzzsaw because you're calling me "chicken", that's for sure.

More comments

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats