site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   31611 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 16, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ever since a police standoff with a homeless man ended in the prosecution of two policemen, I’ve Noticed that my hometown of Albuquerque, New Mexico seems to be functioning as a testbed for leftist movements in coastal cities and inner cities across America. We seem to be a perverse Peoria.

Here’s the next one coming your way: Solomon Peña.

A thief and felon, who somehow managed to convince the right people to let him on the ballots, ran as a Republican to be state legislator in a heavily blue district. Predictably, he lost. He hired a literal conspiracy of people to shoot at Democrat office holders’ homes.

The national news media is calling him a MAGA candidate / MAGA Republican in every news article. I’ve heard from a local who know him and apparently he was always a little off his rocker, not a steady America-First patriot.

Police arrested him ONE DAY after the Bernalillo County Republican Party convention, which I attended along with hundreds of other GOP locals, mostly my parents’ peers. The MAGA wing was out in large numbers, and together we elected a new Treasurer and Vice-Chair. The Chairman retained his seat, the Chairman under whom Peña was allowed to become a candidate. The next day, Peña, who had been the prime suspect for a little while, was arrested.

I cannot overstate how much this one lone nut tarnished the local party in our semi-megalopolis, and I cannot overstate how non-representative he is of the people I met and caucused with. Peña is, in my estimation, one of a tiny minority of politically active Albuquerque Republicans who would even know how to contract with other criminals to shoot up politicians’ homes. I literally only had to Google “Albuquerque Republican” to find the NPR story I linked above.

This stinks of “sources and methods” in my opinion. That story will forever be linked with Albuquerque Republicans. It has been a rousing success for the left in New Mexico’s biggest city. So, I expect similar stories to start popping up in other big blue cities, probably with higher body counts. And it only takes one dead legislator to call MAGA an insurrection movement and make it legally stick. No Republican will be allowed to denounce Peña (or any future similar incidents) and still laud Trump without being called a liar on the denunciation by the media.

I just apartment sat in Albuquerque for a month and it definitely gave me California vibes, albeit not as acute or heavy on the street level dysfunction. More native American homeless and fewer black as well. It has that wide open and nomadic thing going on that you see all across the mountain and coastal west.

Not really speaking to your post but, because Albuquerque.

Did he or did he not have and (R) by his name, is the question.

He did, so it is, style of thing.

If the (D)'s have to suffer their maximally embarasing blue haird types; the (R)'s must likewise endure their own flavor of moron.

If the (D)'s have to suffer their maximally embarasing blue haird types; the (R)'s must likewise endure their own flavor of moron.

The issue is that it's asymmetric warfare. The (D)'s don't have to suffer as much, or for as long, due to media sympathies.

What was once just media sympathies has given birth to a genuinely more grounded and sane-sounding professional class. This is what comes of holding the megaphone and losing the midwit* normies to the other side/social proof.

*This term has come to signify stupid in practice even though it's getting at the modal college degree-holder who is probably slightly above average intelligence.

AOC may be dumb, but she is also genuinely less entertaining than MTG when she makes laughably false claims. Some of it is just down to juiciness more than media bias.

Yep, but some of it is down to bias. Because the media are biased.

Defending democracy against right-wing extremists by means fair and foul, that's what this looks like. "No bad methods, only bad targets".

(sigh)

still laud Trump

The problem with Trump is that he sucks as a president. He's a good showman, not a good executive. Maybe getting rid off him and having someone newer with a broadly similar agenda would help.

Of course, as a resentful provincial, one may be tempted to support Trump merely because Trump/Dems strife is more likely to result in the provinces getting free than a capable presidential administration! I suspect this is the reason e.g. Niccolo Soldo is pro-Trump, purely instrumental reasons.

It seems fair to point out that the local Republican Party did in fact run this guy. It seems even more fair to point out that they probably weren’t paying attention and he just seems like a general nut.

The enemy here is only secondarily the Republican criminal, and primarily the media. If the media did its job honestly, it would report that he was chosen under circumstances which don't reflect on the party because Republicans don't run in his district.

I think there are still some issues with the administration for the state-level GOP. You can find their House GOP spokesman providing bizarre defenses back when Pena was 'merely' a nutty fifteen-time-felon:

“As someone who was raised in the South Valley, I am disappointed to see so-called civil rights activists attempt to use the example of this young Hispanic man, who turned his life around, for their political movida,” said Matt Garcia-Sierra, communications director for the House GOP leadership.

Many argue that one of the major weaknesses of the GOP as an organization is that it affords way too much control and autonomy to it's state and municipal level representatives. Of course just as many Republicans would argue that this is a feature not a bug, distributed authority and internal loci of control being core components of republicanism as a political theory.

The downside of course is situations like this.

deleted

In fairness, a big factor complicating McConnell’s opposition to the terrible candidates in GOP senate primaries was that Trump endorsed these terrible candidates- I have no doubt that at least warnock won mostly because the reason his opponent didn’t know how many kids he had was a toss up between ‘just never bothered to keep track’ and ‘no longer capable of counting due to brain damage’.

In contrast, in Texas(Perry and Cruz) and Florida(Desantis) where non-Trump endorsements were more important, the GOP ran strong candidates in competitive races and generally had a much better record.

So what are you exactly claiming? That Peña is some sort of a double agent for the Dems?

How would you react if a radical-left Democratic politician had hired someone to shoot at his opponents and someone posted to this forum going "ooo, the Republicans are going to have a field day with this"?

What do you mean by "sources and methods"? That phrase is doing a lot of work in your post but it is unclear weather it is working hard or hardly working.

It seems reasonable to assume that y'all nominated and voted for this candidate with full knowledge of his positions and agreed with them as he did not hide them. His past was readily discoverable. This seems more like a failure (?) on the local party's part rather than some covert opperation by the provenly inept deepstate.

He got 383 votes in the Republican primary and only won because Republicans haven't put up a candidate in the district in almost a decade. It's a guaranteed blue seat.

Party problem then.

I don’t have an actual conspiracy theory of who spurred who to doing what, if anything. It was just an amazingly bad coincidence for Albuquerque Republicans that we didn't have the info on Peña’s criminal actions in time to vote out the chairman under whom he was nominated.

It feels like a successful intelligence operation, similar to school shootings by suspects who were on the FBI’s radar. “Sources & methods” is a shorthand reference to the intel community claims that their vital national security work was endangered by attempts to disprove the Trump Russia hoax operation, [Crossfire Hurricane](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossfire_Hurricane_(FBI_investigation)).

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats