This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Pornhub released its annual "Year in Review" - https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2022-year-in-review
Some observations:
The big one... transgenderism had a major bump this year. It's now the 7th most popular category worldwide, and number 1 in Brazil. Perhaps even more surprisingly, "“FTM” (female to male) searches were 8 times more popular than “MTF” (male to female)." Big caveat - the discrepancy might be due to search terms since "trans" and "shemale" default to "MTF."
Asian search terms have an insane dominance. Among the top 6 most searched terms are "Asian," "Japanese," "Pinay," and "hentai" (if that counts).
For the SOME LARGE NUMBER of years in a row, hentai is one of the top search terms. Is the 4chan meme that 2d girls better than 3d true?
The search terms by age group is kind of hilarious. Zoomers love virtual reality, cosplay, and hentai (unreality/escape from reality). Millennials love Asians, tattoos on girls, feet, and transgenders. Gen X is just as degenerate, only the boomers like good old honest red blooded smut like handjobs, "babe," and small tits.
One big caveat over the entire "Year in Review" is that Pornhub banned unverified amateur content a few years ago, so niche searches are probably marginalized.
The other even bigger caveat is that there is definitely stat manipulation at play. "Teen" is mysteriously absent from the entire page, even though it has to be among the most common searches. Same for "step-sister," "rape," and probably a few other taboo subjects.
(I realize I'm very late to this thread)
"Rape" is absent because it's not on PornHub. If you search "rape" on PornHub, you get this message (abridged for brevity):
At least the message is better than it used to be—IIRC last time I looked, if you searched "rape", you'd get a message telling you to seek therapy.
More options
Context Copy link
The age groups are out of whack. Since when is Gen X 35-54 years old? I'm 37 and when the eponymous novel was published I was worrying about what school would be like, not about wasting my best years working a McJob. 1965-1980 is what, 42-57?
More options
Context Copy link
Trans and hentai are niche genres, so you have to specifically search for them to get the desired result. Searches for ordinary straight porn are scattered over dozens of less specific search terms.
Most porn is produced in Eastern Europe and the US, so white performers are the default. You'd only search for race if you want non-white.
User demographics are just a guess based on Google Analytics.
This. No one searches for "straight" or "live-action". People correctly assume it's what they're getting if not specifying something else.
Why even search? You can just scroll through the never-ending front page and middle-click any thumbnail that strikes your fancy.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Every now and then some porn preferences study comes out and it turns out that the deep south disproportionately likes porn with black actors. And then people have a laugh about racist Republicans in the south being horny for blacks.
But those states are also disproportionately black. So binning the info by state, the blackest data bins have the highest searches for black porn.
So yeah, the demographic implications of these kinds of reports could just be wrong. It's not a detailed poll with demographic information of a representative sampling of the population.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Drawn/animated pornography is super-stimulus, but not only does it make the anatomically-impossible commonplace (dickgirls, extreme body sizes, vore, breasts larger than those occasionally found on Ontario shop teachers, being able to emit more bodily fluid over the course of one act than anyone does over their entire lifetime), it also generally manages to make those things aesthetically pleasing, too.
It also obviates a problem some kinds of people have with porn where "it's degrading and violating to the people in it". No people? No problem.
"Asian" and "Japanese" are good proxies for "teen" generally because of this. It's a stereotype for a reason; the high-pitched squeaking and school uniforms aren't really doing the heavy lifting.
More options
Context Copy link
I like Asians, handjobs, small tits (and large), and hentai. What gen am I?
I am interested to know why incest and faux-cest were not mentioned, and if they were manipulated like you suggest. I wouldn't have expected they would be either left out or manipulated out. My impression of the incest porn scene is that it's insanely popular, but no one actually believes any of it is real. So you wouldn't think that faux-cest would be quite so taboo, if no one really believes it.
I personally can't stand that incest is so popular, though, real or not. It's exploded over just about every site, and I find it to be a significant turnoff, even if it's clearly fake. I'm pretty sure in 3 years, you'll have to go to special porn sites to just see porn that's not incest-related. It's also annoying how much there's just normal porn that was clearly not designed with incest in mind, that just has a title that's incest related. It's lazy and clickbaity, and it's just everywhere.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link