Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
- 20
- 3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/262047/pope-francis-to-take-meetings-at-home-while-sick-with-bronchitis-vatican-says
Pope's health is in the news again. For anyone saying 'Bronchitis isn't that big a deal' remember he's 88, in poor health even for his age, and this is not his first recent visible health decline causing alterations to normal papal activities. At some level there's wishcasting from an institutional church which views him as a wreckingball needing to be replaced by almost literally anyone else, but we can expect that this article, relying on public statements which would have come from within the inner circle, is less prone to that.
Just within the last few months, the pope has had repeated falls, multiple cancelled customary appearances, and admitted illnesses. I have noticed that journalists with better 'inside baseball' sources are less sanguine about the pope's health, although how much of that is wishcasting from the normiecon(=not used to a bad pope) bishops and priests who run the Vatican is hard to say. Either way, a 2025 conclave is definitely in the cards if probably not an immediate occurrence- there's not even rumors of practices for a papal funeral.
Is it expected that the next Pope will be more conservative?
https://collegeofcardinalsreport.com/
I think out of those we can safely say that Sarah is too much of a firebrand, Tagle too third world(the Philippines have not looked good inside the church in a while), and Parolin too close to the current pope to be electable.
The next pope will certainly be more conventional and probably walk back big chunks of pope Francis’s agenda. That doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll be a conservative but it’s probably politically necessary for him to give the conservatives at least some wins. Of the top papabile Eijk, Ranjith, and Erdo are solid conservatives and Pizzaballa certainly leans in that direction. Zuppi is generally a liberal but more interested in appeasing conservatives than cracking down(this makes him more electable). It’s generally thought that the conservatives have a veto block(conclave rules require 2/3- so a block with more than 1/3 can block an election, but not advance their own candidate) and the liberals have just shy of one- so the likeliest candidate is a compromise one.
I'm still hoping that something truly crazy happens and we get Athanasius Schneider as the next Pope.
Eijk or Erdo seem to have the best realistic shot of the "obvious" conservatives. Conservative American Catholics have the fever dream of Burke, but that's just not going to happen - the American Catholic church is a weird combination of too powerful, in long term decline, and far to schizophrenic within itself to get that brass ring of a Papacy.
I have an unverifiable theory that a lot of even more liberal Cardinals see Pope Francais as a failed experiment in promoting a "third worlder." Conservative or note, I would be heavily included to wager the next Pope is from Europe - and nowhere east of Berlin.
I think success for a new Pope is clarity in doctrine of the faith and a renewed evangelization focused on bedrock truths that are unanimous; real presence, the trinity, marian sinlessness etc. Defenders of Pope Francais can quibble about intent and outcome, but I think it's safe to say that the man has been unnecessarily vague on many issues ("Who am I to judge?" ... "We're not blessing the union of same sex couples, but just the individuals who may or may not be in those couples") and has neglected a lot of the basic near unanimous issues (real presence is, imho, one of those rallying cries).
I still don't know entirely what to Make of Vatican 2 from a purely theological perspective. I do believe strongly that Vatican 2 created an opening for beige Catholicism. Once you have a watered down liturgy with Father Friendly playing an acoustic guitar and preaching about The Buddy Christ, a lot of kids who grow up in these kind of parishes end up leaving pretty quickly because it all starts to seem, well, fake and gay.
But it all stems from the same original issue - spending too much time paying attention to highly modern concerns that aren't at the core of the Faith. This is an inversion. "Hmmm, we really need to tackle the Catholic approach to climate change because climate change is really important in the world right now." The Church should not be led around by the concern of The World. The whole point is that it's helping to prepare the faithful for the Kingdom of God without getting bogged down and distracted by worldly distractions, pleasures, concerns.
So, I'd like to see a Pope who makes Playing The Hits a big part of his time in The Big Chair. Focus - and get others to focus - on the 2000 year old bedrock stuff. Maybe get a little tough on the Orthodox about the Filioque or something. Get behind the Latin Mass in a big way. Make Nuns Great Again.
We need a clear and strong - perhaps, "based", as the kids say - Catholic leader to reinvigorate the Church.
More options
Context Copy link
I'm somewhat interested and want to know more. Is this down to normal papal politics, or due to domestic Filipino politics?
Due to corruption and a decline in religiosity perceived to be way in excess of the level of development, mostly. With the typical Filipino bishop having a reputation for mismanagement, corruption, and greed, it’s pretty easy to point fingers at a prominent liberal cardinal who would rather play politics than manage his own backyard.
In wealthy countries like the US and the Netherlands secularization is mostly perceived as fait accompli with improvement as a generational process; in countries like Mexico experiencing genuinely above the regional average economic growth it’s easy to write off as an inevitable process which can be, at best, tempered, and it’s unfair to blame the local church for it. The Philippines is still regarded within the church as a genuinely poor country with genuinely poor country problems, and the absolutely massive decline in Catholicism locally which hasn’t happened in Africa and India is mostly blamed on mismanagement. The TDLR is it saw an Ireland level collapse in the faith without the usual explanatory factors, with a hierarchy already in low regard among just about everyone.
Dang.
Honestly, I've been under the impression that Catholic faith has been historically pretty strong in the Philippines, so to hear that it's experiencing a secular collapse on its own is a bit odd.
To be clear, the Filipino bishops and their graft and incompetence almost certainly don't bear 100% of the blame- the Catholic Church was much better managed(granted, low bar to clear) in Ireland, and worse managed in Africa, and bishops are not particularly prominent enough figures to deserve as much credit for results as they sometimes claim(with individual exceptions, of course, but the average bishop acts more like a financial manager and HR supervisor in one office than a visionary CEO). But what was viewed as likely the most Catholic country in the world in 2010 seeing the kind of decline that the Phillippines has seen is going to get someone blamed- and the bishops redirecting aid funds almost certainly didn't help even if Duterte picking fights with them was probably a bigger factor(somewhat uniquely, there doesn't seem to be a sex abuse expose involved- it's politics, evangelicalism's appeal in poor countries, and probably some papal gaffes plus the local Catholic Church being an easy target for criticism). I mean, they did leave themselves open to rumored stunts like Duterte telling his bodyguards that they had to go SSPX if they went to church because at least they don't steal from the poor(the real reason if true being different attitudes towards criminal justice reform, obviously) being plausible to the public.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I don't follow Church politics (which to my eyes seem even more esoteric and opaque than the secular ones), but I remember hearing that there was some rally of the conservative faction as a result of Francis becoming pope.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link