This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Maybe. I'm sure a hypothetical therapist would ask her, a model, "so, what are you getting out of posing nude at the Grammy's?" and her response wouldn't be "absolutely nothing, I'm just a prisoner here in my world famous musician husband's $35 million Beverly Hills mega-mansion".
Just seems like performance art to me.
I agree. It might even fail to rise to the low bar of "performance art." This is a publicity stunt and one that a Kanye affiliated lady has done already!.
When women don't have clothes on, people take notice. It isn't just attractive or famous women. All over the world, every single day, men pay out inordinate amounts of cash simply to see women with less or no clothing on. Sexual interaction need not be present. I'm talking about topless bars / strip clubs / what have you. Let's also remember that men continue to do this when endless explicit sexual content is freely instantly available in digital form. In 2025, more people have access to endless free porn than clean drinking water - and men are still literally throwing cash at IRL women on the daily.
So, Kanye, a person who has made his money in the pop culture entertainment industry, knows that "tits = eyeballs" and that this will be the same today, tomorrow, and forever.
There is nothing more and nothing less to the story.
More options
Context Copy link
Always a little bit amused when people not only take the most surface level read of a particular person's behavior, but aggressively impose their own biases on it, reading deep into 'body language' tics that may not even be there.
Its trivial to 'fake' a particular emotional state, especially to cameras. They're literally entertainers its part of their job description. The weird public behavior is about the weakest evidence of the true situation you could find.
So no, I have my beliefs about Kanye, but not much reason to believe he is actually going to lock a woman up without her consent and abuse her until she can't think of leaving.
Its absurdly hard for me to believe that this woman is 'trapped' in a marriage with Kanye in any real sense. My current most likely hypothesis is they both have some kind of exhibitionism kink that Kanye is rich enough to indulge on the largest platforms around, which is gross in that including the public into that is really violating everyone elses' interest in maintaining certain standards of decency.
And in those cases, acting embarrassed or humiliated is oftentimes literally part of the kink.
Also vaguely reminded of Bezos' new wife and her outfit at the Inauguration.
Yeah, this is my take too. It's a way clearer explanation than both people risking their reputations for basically nothing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link