site banner
PaperclipPerfector  26d ago (text post)   36916 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 27, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Israel has defeated Egypt several times before; there's very few people living in the Sinai and a border at the Suez gives them the physical space necessary for death camps.

So the plan is

  1. Invade Egypt and make the big powers very unhappy because of how they need the Suez Canal for their trade
  2. Move a few million Palestinians out of Gaza and into the Sinai where they'll be tortured, starved, brainwashed and/or exterminated in death camps
  3. Somehow hope this doesn't turn into a darkly ironic Warsaw Ghetto uprising but larger and with more tunnels
  4. Somehow avoid having the Israeli economy reduced to zero
  5. Somehow get weapons and munitions to do all this from... the US? Or who?
  6. Secure all their other borders against air and ground attacks at the same time

See Nazi Germany could try this kind of stunt (while fighting first-rate world powers) because they actually were a big, strong country with the armies and industry needed to conquer large territories and exterminate people en masse. Israel is not a big country and enjoys less freedom of action, their army is smaller than Turkey's.

Thailand has a bigger army. Indonesia has a bigger army. Size matters and Israel isn't big, they have no room to make errors and little resources to fall back on.

Moreover, Israel is reliant for its suffrage on a moral system that such actions would undermine. Israel exists and is tolerated in large part because of Western guilt over antisemitism and the Holocaust, a belief in the idea of self determination for ethnic minorities. The moment those beliefs disappear in the USA and the west, so does Israel.

Israel is a nuclear state

South Africa was, too, one upon a time.

South Africa had 6 primitive nuclear weapons made with barely enriched uranium and was less than 10% white(Israel has an outright Jewish majority).

In 1994 whites made up just 10% of the population in South Africa. Even in a fully integrated Israel-Palestine Jews would be 40-50% of the population at the start.

Plus, the whites knew that to some extent South Africa remaining a broadly capitalist country in which they could keep their private property was likely under the international system. Black South Africans mostly don’t hate white people. Even today, the great majority of the richest people and largest landowners in South Africa are white; whites own ~70% of agricultural land and are overrepresented even in the current governing coalition with the ANC.

In the event of an Israel-Palestine I very much doubt the relationship between Jews and Arabs will look like that 30 years after integration.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats