site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   2854 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for January 12, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What do people think about the idea of longevity escape velocity happening in our lifetimes? (I’m 32)

I am very bearish on this ever happening.

There are islands of longevity where people live for 100+ years very frequently, but everyone with a documented age follows the Bible’s rule that no one lives longer than 120. Bodies just don’t last, even with no sickness people aren’t going to live more than a decade or too longer than the current oldest people.

I believe it actually says 120.

You’re right, edited.

Tangent:

Let's say we get the MacGuffin that extends everyone to 130+ with ease. Does the Pope-At-The-Time allow for suicide after 120?

There are islands of longevity where people live for 100+ years very frequently

Where? The Blue Zones thing is fake. https://www.cremieux.xyz/p/the-blue-zone-distraction

Probably we could find some real ones somewhere. Monaco seems like a good candidate with a lifespan nearing 90 years old. Chinese-American women live to nearly 92 on average.

But yeah, maximum life span hasn't increased. The worldwide gains in life expectancy are just the result of a higher percentage of people reaching their genetic potential. We'll never have a life expectancy over 100 years old unless we can fix aging itself.

Fair, and I suppose probably unsurprising.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats