The Wednesday Wellness threads are meant to encourage users to ask for and provide advice and motivation to improve their lives. It isn't intended as a 'containment thread' and any content which could go here could instead be posted in its own thread. You could post:
-
Requests for advice and / or encouragement. On basically any topic and for any scale of problem.
-
Updates to let us know how you are doing. This provides valuable feedback on past advice / encouragement and will hopefully make people feel a little more motivated to follow through. If you want to be reminded to post your update, see the post titled 'update reminders', below.
-
Advice. This can be in response to a request for advice or just something that you think could be generally useful for many people here.
-
Encouragement. Probably best directed at specific users, but if you feel like just encouraging people in general I don't think anyone is going to object. I don't think I really need to say this, but just to be clear; encouragement should have a generally positive tone and not shame people (if people feel that shame might be an effective tool for motivating people, please discuss this so we can form a group consensus on how to use it rather than just trying it).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yes. I re-read sections of it along with a friend while re-watching the show. It holds up better than I remember, I might re-read it in full. There are parts that might not hold up perfectly, and you can do nit-picky historical accuracy stuff (technically Geishas didn't exist at that exact time, stuff like that), but if you view it primarily from the perspective of Blackthorne (largely as a stand-in for Clavell himself, who was a prisoner of the Japanese in Singapore during WWII) I think it holds up really well. It's very GRRM when it comes to throneroom politics, very Ian Fleming when it comes to swashbuckling omni-competent British hero everyone wants to fuck.
Reading it again in parts, I realized how much the book is a metaphor for the aftermath of WWII. It starts with the Japanese doing unforgivable things to Blackthorne and his men, and asks how can he forgive them? This mirrors the journey of Japan in the second half of the twentieth century: how can Clavell forgive the Japanese for what they did to him, how can the Japanese forgive the Americans for the bombings? Clavell suggests it is possible for people so totally opposed to find human connection, understanding, and love; even if the book is far from utopian in its vision.
Okay, that sounds pretty cool. I like the idea of taking as the narrative of a British man rather than that of an omniscient narrator. I'll pull it off my shelf and give it a read.
More options
Context Copy link
My problem with the praise of the (remade) miniseries is how the ostensible protagonist of Shogun (Blackthorne) is relegated to an ineffectual buffoon, without any real redeeming qualities apart from the fact that Toranaga and Mariko seemingly take to him. I enjoyed the book immensely both times I read it. I am somewhat surprised by your praise of Ta Nehini Coates, who I think is a muddled-thinking fraud.. That said, I haven't read this book you're recommending.
I mostly agree with you about the miniseries, I think it wasn't great as an adaptation, but it's a favorite of my mother and I, one of the first "adult" books she gave me when I was a teen, and I'd previously gotten her the Orson-Welles TV miniseries for her birthday years ago. So it was event viewing for us, we watched an episode every few days with the kind of vaguely-Asian food that nods towards the concept while being edible to my boomer parents. So I enjoyed it for the bonding and seeing one of my favorite stories on screen, but the de-centering of Blackthorne was a weakness. He needed to be: A) Freakishly tall, B) Blond, C) Super Hot.
RE TNC: I like his writing and find him interesting, even if I don't agree with him on everything. The Message isn't a book that's meant to prove his moral postulates, it's a book that is meant to take his liberal-left premises as a given and then apply them to the situation at hand. If you're reading The Message and you want to contest his premises, then the book doesn't really have much for you. The fact that Hughes in that review can't grok to the fact that the book is framed as a series of lectures at his alma mater, hence the "comrades," makes me distrust the review in general; but I find house slaves like Hughes obnoxious so that might be a personal dislike.
The Message is a work of theology, and like any work of theology it doesn't need to start with Genesis. TNC makes a bulletproof argument, in my view, that if one views the segregationist South's sheriffs and Apartheid South Africa's Bantustans as unqualified evils, then one is also obligated by one's own liberal moral code to view modern-day Israel-Palestine as evil and wrong. It punctures the myth that the Holocaust absolves Israel's sins today, "your oppression will not save you."
Of course, if one disagrees that Apartheid South Africa's Bantustans were a bad thing, or that Sundown Town Sheriffs telling car travelers to move on outta here before you get into trouble were bad people, if one thought that being a perpetrator was better than being a victim and NEVER thought that anyone's oppression would save them, then TNC's argument holds no logic for you. Any more than reading an argument about whether Marijuana is halal will make any sense to you if you think Islam is the ravings of an epileptic whose rich wife took a consolation-diagnosis from a passing monk too seriously.
I can understand and appreciate either side of the argument. People who have nostalgia for Apartheid and support Israel, or people who worship Mandela and oppose Israel. What gets stuck in my craw here is people who worship Mandela and support Israel, and I think TNC does a good job of arguing against them by their own logic.
Not sure where the "house slave" comment came from; that's surprisingly uncharitable from you, but maybe he (or I) wound you up.
Your either/or argument here doesn't move me, actually, nor do your analogies, but it's an interesting perspective.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link