site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6d ago (text post)   2223 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for December 29, 2024

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Currently working my way through Wind And Truth by Sanderson. Also, was at the bookstore recently and decided to pick up some more Heinlein after I enjoyed Starship Troopers so much. I got The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, will probably start that sometime later this week.

Adolin story carries hard tbh

For me it's the Dalinar story. Finding out more about the history of the world is fascinating. The Kaladin story is my second favorite for similar reasons.

Wind and truth is a slog, honestly. Sanderson is spending a lot of time on modern mental health issues for every single viewpoint character. There is character building and then there is exhausting navel gazing....

I'm quite enjoying it. Not finding it a slog at all. I'm only 40% through or so, we'll see if that changes but I doubt it.

I think I first noticed it in Dawnshard, the therapist speak. I think his older work is much more balanced and not as grating in this way. (WOK still rocks, I reread 1-3 and then read Dawnshard and Rhythm of War in Nov/Dec.

I noticed in the last couple of books. It’s a damn shame because the idea that only people with a crack in their soul can get powers is genius - it naturally integrates “is a plot-relevant character” and “has potential for character development”.

But then it’s like he lost sight of the difference between character flaws and DSM entries. Which leads to cringy writing but also causes problems because you are not allowed to treat DSM issues as things that can be overcome.

But then it’s like he lost sight of the difference between character flaws and DSM entries. Which leads to cringy writing but also causes problems because you are not allowed to treat DSM issues as things that can be overcome.

That's exactly why I decided not to bother continuing after Rhythm of War.

Fair, but it’s £10 every two years, he’s earned that much from me. And I liked Wax & Wayne, so he’s still putting out good stuff in general.

Just started The Way of Kings for the first time myself, it's tough avoiding spoilers on social media. Initial thoughts are that the spren are very goofy and Kaladin's depression isn't as effective a plot point as it would be if he weren't already an incredible soldier and surgeon. The worldbuilding seems cool though.

The Way of Kings was my first Sanderson book and I really struggled with it. I spent probably 2/3 of the book wondering when there was going to be an interesting plot. In truth I would've dropped it, if not for the fact that it was a Christmas gift (so, a bit rude to give up on it) from my sister (who I know to have good taste in books). But man when the book finally gets going, it goes hard. Sanderson loves to write his books as a slow burn followed by an explosion.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats