site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 9, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Piggybacking on this most-recent Mangione-related top-level to provide an update on the traction of the "gray tribe shooter" narrative: Besides the Independent article, the LA Times has now jumped on board the Mangione-as-gray-tribe narrative.

I now have high confidence that "exposes" from places like the Guardian and the Atlantic will be published in the near-ish future. I'm not entirely sure of the angle that the Atlantic will likely take (the Guardian's I expect will be "gray men bad, but especially rocket man bad").

I could see the Atlantic digging deeper than just dragging TPOT, Thiel and Musk. What are the implications when the Vice President elect, the Supreme Court, and a lone-wolf assassin "with a dark fandom" have all signaled that they've read or been exposed to a niche online writer by the name of Scott Alexander (prospective Atlantic title: "50 Shades of Grey")? What role have long-form bloggers had in reshaping the political landscape since 2020 (e.g. tie-in Scott to Substack's rise and maybe drag Moldbug et. al, maybe featuring some form of "Joe Rogan, but for the techno-literati")? Is Trump's victory not an affirmation of Trump but a political realignment by an ascendant gray (neither red-nor-blue) identity?

Lots of places it could go from here, but I don't see any of them ending in a great place for public perception.

EDIT: And a bonus (because I don't see anyone else talking about it except journos, Mangione's likely reddit account was found for anyone that's interested. Nothing groundbreaking in there, but more corroboration that it was likely a back-pain related meltdown.

When you click it has an important-looking warning banner that "This Account Has Been Suspended!"

The content is archived here.

How did they find it?

Frankly, I'm still giggling that after years of redditors claiming themotte users would do spree killings, the first rat murderer came right out of /r/GeorgistFuckCarsAnticapitalismTEDtalks, and got the most uncritical support from the same people who were faking performing hysteria over "violent right wing extremism" in 2020. They went straight from claiming the motte needed to be banned before nybbler shot up a synagogue to fedposting about shooting up a board meeting, with zero cognitive dissonance.

Noticed theschism has been pointedly avoiding discussing it

Mangione's politics appear to be all over the place, and I still wouldn't be shocked to find out he had an account on the motte at some point.

Why do you think the schism is "avoiding talking about it"? What is your model of their thinking that leads to this pointed avoidance of the topic? I skim the schism now and then and they are so low volume that many big events don't get a single post.

Is that the theschism pointedly avoiding discussing, or is there a general lack of discussion at theschism?

True, discussion did sort of peter out rather than just avoid that particular topic. It's strange the way it goes through bursts of activity like that. Guess it's inevitable for a smaller community that doesn't have a rolling boil going.