site banner
PaperclipPerfector  19d ago (text post)   30929 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 2, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Firearms training sufficient to clear multiple malfunctions

The shooter was using subsonic ammunition that did not have the necessary oomph behind it to work the action - he knew the slide was going to need to be racked after each shot.

He also either stole the suppressor (unlikely) or passed a very rigorous background check by the ATF to acquire it. Recently, wait times for suppressors have dropped from ~6 months to just a couple of days, a rare instance of a government org suddenly getting more efficient.

The shooter was using subsonic ammunition that did not have the necessary oomph behind it to work the action - he knew the slide was going to need to be racked after each shot.

Or he was using a homemade suppressor that did not incorporate a Nielsen device.

Because most semi-automatic pistols for sale utilize a moving barrel of one type or another, adding a suppressor (or any 9mm muzzle device) to the end of that barrel can have a detrimental effect to the firearm’s reliability, even in some cases to the point of preventing the gun from cycling at all. To remedy this, handgun suppressors commonly use a Nielsen device, also sometimes referred to as a piston or booster. This device increases the amount of energy that is directed rearward into the firearm’s barrel, counteracting the weight of the suppressor at the end and aiding in unlocking the action during the firing cycle.

I would be very surprised if he acquired this suppressor legally, and fairly surprised if he stole it.

It's also possible he bought a solvent trap off eBay.

You can go on a road trip and get them with cash:

https://jkarmament.com/find-a-dealer/

He also either stole the suppressor (unlikely) or passed a very rigorous background check by the ATF to acquire it.

Building a suppressor is not difficult.

This is true. I'm not sure I would necessarily trust the success of an assassination attempt to one I made myself, but there are obvious reasons to DIY of course

You can test the suppressor before using it in your assassination attempt lol. That's not a real issue.

Sure. It's a simple device. I haven't done it, but I'd be surprised if the average joe's DIY can is as quiet as the products other people develop. This one, if DIY, failed to return the gun to battery multiple times. Like I said - not a compromise I would make, even against a soft target.

It's very easy with the partially made kits you can get for cash. They sell a overpriced guide so you can't mess up with a hand drill if you don't feel confident enough to free hand it or have a drill press. Buy a few and practice; most of the baffles are interchangeable.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats