This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Except that the official story is that this is a lie by the vast right wing conspiracy, and the government is actually doing the rescuing. And people here are perfectly willing to steelman FEMAs actions so they can agree that's so.
What's weird to me is that people are asserting that FEMA is helping but providing exactly zero evidence - except maybe there is some action in Asheville.
Proving that FEMA isn't helping is hard. That's like proving a universal negative.
But proving that FEMA is helping should be easy. The evidence should be all over social media. And yet none of FEMA's defenders seems to be interested in doing that.
Ergo, FEMA probably isn't doing much of anything useful.
Did you even bother looking? Here's the governor of NC stating that FEMA has provided $27M and organized shelter for 1,400 people. Here's FEMA's own press release column, complete with photographic evidence.
You are in a bubble. As long as you're only looking for tweets that flatter your existing story, guess what you're going to find?
Those numbers are comically low. $27 million? I’m probably in a bubble but everything being posted in defense of FEMA here is such faint praise that I’m now almost certain the bubble is right on this one.
Oh, only now?
I am struggling to be charitable here. You asked for evidence that FEMA was doing anything useful. I was able to provide that with five minutes on Google. Now you want to complain about the numbers. Fine. But you have to actually contribute something.
What would it take to change your mind?
Replying since it's a direct question even though it's an old thread.
I recognize that perhaps I am not contributing to this conversation with data. My argument is that no one really is. And evidence of things being accomplished is easier to prove than the lack of things being accomplished.
You did find evidence of aid being delivered, however slight, so I will recognize that you have made greater contributions than I have.
If I contribute to the thread in the current week, I will spend some time researching before typing.
That's a good question and I will think about it. Presumably, if the FEMA admins were working overtime that would be a good first step to changing my mind. But apparently they are keeping 9-5 hours and the head of FEMA was seen out shopping at a luxury store in DC. Senior management of FEMA should be, you know, actually in the disaster zone.
I'll try to remain open to the idea that maybe FEMA is not completely useless, but I'm also having a hard time being charitable I guess.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I pointed this out lower in the thread.
RW Person: Makes claim critical of government with some evidence (though often anecdotal)
Government official: That is untrue (doesn’t provide receipts).
Media: RW person debunked and spreading dangerous misinformation.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link