This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In this case it's true that there are women as strong as Imane Khelif (though to me that's more evidence that she's not a man). She's got 9 losses on her record, if it weren't for a difference in weight classes she would be facing one of the Irish boxers who beat her handily in the 2020 Olympics again.
I'm not sure "cuts weight and loses, puts on a bunch of muscle and starts kicking ass" is exactly an argument in favour of 'khelif is not that great anyways' or whatever people are trying to argue here. I did watch part of the Broadhurst fight now, and Khelif is certainly visibly more muscled now.
'Khelif is not that great anyways' is a hard argument to make given that she's now fighting for a silver medal. 'Khelif handily beats everyone except for other medal winning boxers' just means she's a top contender.
I was talking about Kellie Harrington who once had a 32 fight winning streak and is fighting for gold tomorrow. Women's boxing isn't that big of a sport, you are going to have lots of skewed bouts until you get near the end of the tournament because the best fighters severely outmatch the rest.
More options
Context Copy link
A man is going to have an easier time cutting weight, less of the female bodyfat that is more or less uncuttable.
Sure -- but he will be weaker. Khelif is 6'1", and fought Broadhurst at 62.5 kilos, which is what, 135lbs? I'm 5'10", and I don't think I've ever been 5'10" and 135 lbs; by the time I got to my full height in high school I weighed like 145 and was weak as fuck.
So "loses to Broadhurst, eats some cheeseburgers and puts on ten pounds of muscle" (also much easier if you have some testosterone in the mix) explains quite well (to me) why Khelif is more dominant now than before?
I'm not gonna look for vintage photos, but this looks pretty different to me than the Broadhurst video.
Male pro at 5'10 135
Extra test gets you extra muscle. A male minimum health body fat is 8-10%, while for women it's closer to 16-20%.
Also, on wikipedia she's listed at 5'10". Assuming she cuts some weight, probably walking around at 150-160. Which is roughly the height and weight I was when I started rowing in college.
It's 183 cm from the tape on the match you linked -- this is quite a big difference as to how much weight one should be carrying. (not to mention pretty far out on the bellcurve itself for non-testosterone-puberty enjoyers.)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link