This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Drat, you beat me too it. So a couple of thoughts-
Student loans has an obvious explanation- Women are more likely to go to college(because there is no other socially acceptable decision for non-poor women, and no one wants to be poor), choose degrees which are appealing to women(which tend to pay less), when they're not able to handle their first choice degrees switch to psychology(while men tend to go to work), etc, etc. All that means is that women are typically the ones suffering under student loans. Even a young woman with few student loans because of scholarships, fortunate job placement, etc. likely runs in a social circle which overwhelmingly has student loan issues, and women tend to be more sensitive to each others' problems.
Women tend to really value resources, and in the past few years the same-class standard of living for the red tribe has started getting much higher than for the blue tribe. It'll be interesting to see if that has any bearing on this trend in the future, assuming it continues. We know, BTW, that it isn't an inherent fact of life that women don't like red tribe things- Taylor Swift literally started as a country singer and church attendance has slanted female for forever. And while red tribe leftism exists, it rarely looks like a winning horse to back, although some of its hobby horses can get incorporated in a winning agenda, compassionate conservatism style.
Abortion is the mind-killer and public rhetoric about it is generally quite poor, but liberal rhetoric about abortion is in particular just blatant lies. Pregnancy checkpoints in red states, handmaids tale, etc. Prolife rhetoric is the same five arguments repeated ad nauseam but it's usually not a lie unless you play definitional games. And one of those things tends to really hype up why women should care about it, even if it's simply factually not true.
How much of this on the female side is metoo, too? Rape is a primal fear for young women, and the metoo narrative does have something to say to women, and tends to spread through female-heavy social media platforms. Insane rape scaremongering probably drives young women towards the feminist side of things on a 'men just suck and you have to be protected from them- all of them' basis. That can fit comfortably in the left side of the coalition.
This gap is mostly about women moving left, not men moving right. https://news.gallup.com/poll/609914/women-become-liberal-men-mostly-stable.aspx
Is this a conclusion we can draw with certainty from women's usual observable behavior? I have my doubts.
Can you add detail? I'm not trying to needle you here, genuinely curious. I feel like there's some evopsych data you've got.
The everyday observable behavior of average young women does not seem to indicate that they are gripped by a primal fear of rape.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link