This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Minimodding has to be the most annoying thing that can happen in a forum. Stop being a weenie.
What does this mean? Have never heard this term before.
If you're referring to tone/witch policing that's extremely common here and one of the things that makes this forum excellent. We generally self police against low effort baiting.
You're acting like a hall monitor. You're carrying water for authority despite authority not caring about you. You are licking the boot. You are kissing the ass.
It's all the same thing with different phrasings. He is accusing you of being a groupie and intrinsically low status.
He's acting like a member of a community, who cares about the general atmosphere.
...Other than running this place for years, preserving norms despite intense pressure to the contrary, and building an entire new site when the last one was in danger of getting banned, sure. But apart from all that...
I've had some remarkably spirited disagreements with some of the mods here. Despite serious disagreements over values and occasionally facts, they've treated me completely fairly and with a surprising amount of respect. The rules here actually work. The mods are not perfect, but they are some of the best I've had the honor of posting under, and they're a huge part of what I and many others value about this place. I'm going to put forward that if there's a problem, it's a "you" problem, not a "them" problem.
I'm not actually sure if you're new here or if you just switched names; I'm not the best at IDing based on style. If you are new, you should know that that the mods enforce a fairly high standard of decorum. If you can stay above that floor, you can make just about any point you might wish to, and you'll get a fairer hearing and better discussion than you'd get pretty much anywhere else on the internet. But part of what makes it work is the universal demand that to participate here, one keeps the more atavistic elements of one's nature on a short leash. You seem to be able to handle this most of the time, but then sometimes you just lash out over stupid crap. Keep that up, and you'll eat bans, and the rest of us will not complain because you will have earned them.
For people complaining that moderation is too strict, pre 2018 moderation was more strict than now, I can attest. The no 'boo outgroup' rule was closely enforced. 4chan is an example of what minimal moderation looks like. So why doesn't minotaur go there. Maybe because it's just full of annons . Going from annons to a community necessitates some boundaries, hence moderation. I think on net the mods are going a good job.
More options
Context Copy link
The norms have seen all the best posters banished, keeping the place running requires no effort (a community is its members, not its leaders), but I will give full credit for paying this site's hosting costs and setting it up. Everyone on the mod team who contributed to that is free to take a bow -- with the understanding that this uniquely useful function they performed had nothing to do with moderation.
More options
Context Copy link
Like you, I have had some frustrating disagreements with the mods in the past, but think they deserve respect and appreciation for their efforts here. But they chose to be mods knowing full well what that entails, and knowing the compensation they would receive would be ephemeral at best. And if that was a dig, it was one of the mildest digs at the mods I have ever seen. If it upset them they are fully capable of defending themselves.
In this place taking a mild and ambiguous dig and spinning it as out of line because the mods don't charge us for something no one has ever paid for seems especially odious, because if even something like that is not on, what is? This is a place where witches argue, I'm not saying the mods should tolerate any abuse they receive, but surely they can tolerate whatever abuse was perceived in that dig.
I was definitely being overly touchy in that claim. They clarified farther down that their intent wasn't what I had assumed.
More options
Context Copy link
I'm less worried about the mods than about seeing users flame out. People who adopt a "fuck da poleese" stance end up getting themselves banned out fairly rapidly.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This depends heavily on whether you think the authority is legitimate. Personally one of the most frustrating things I see leftists do is equate right wing Christians to groupie bootlickers who crave authority because they worship God.
Are you actually anti authoritarian as a philosophy or just towards authorities you find illegitimate?
Edit: to be clear I don't deny carrying water in this instance, because the mods are an authority I respect. I think the status of the behavior depends on your perspective.
I'll also admit that I misunderstood how the rules fundamentally work so this one is on me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link