This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm not sure if I've asked this before, but how, exactly, do you explain the same cultural developments happening in a host of other countries with scant or practically no Jewish presence? All simply due to downstream effects of American culture, even back in the days before the omnipresence of the said American culture?
Well, the European Continent was destroyed by Captain America and Uncle Joe, who then proceeded to impose very tight ideological and information control on much of Europe for decades. America is an Empire, it's plainly obvious that European countries adopting American-style culture is not happening independently of the cultural developments in America.
Eastern Europe lags behind, also pointing towards American cultural influence, and the lack thereof throughout a lot of the 20th century, although it is certainly growing. It's not a stretch to say the global hegemon is chiefly responsible for the cultural developments in Europe. That's how empires work, especially in the age of Mass Media where millions of people all around the world can crowd into the Dionysia and watch the myth of Abraham Erskine injecting Steve Rogers with an Ubermensch serum so he can go fight Nazis.
But much of what you discuss refers to developments taking place before WW2, and before the true ascendance of American culture in Western Europe, too (ie. after the 60s). And it's not exactly like most of Europe needed the American media to tell them that Nazis were bad, the part where Nazis occupied most of Europe at one part of the war or another, imposed a very restrictive regime even by the most generous revisionist standards, and then failed miserably in ways that led to the ruination of their original country managed that quite well by itself.
But what I'm talking about is that when I read Finnish history, Finland seems to have not only managed to have huge, even revolutionary, socialist and communist movements with barely any Jewish participation, but also hit the milestones for most of the things right-wingers complain about - feminism, gay rights etc. in roughly the same schedule as the United States.
The locals advancing these ideals in Finnish (or in Swedish - an extraordinary part of early social-progressive activists of the 60s seem to have been Finland-Swedes, and one local conservative even basically said that there's no need for antisemitism here because Swedes played the same role) would have, in great majority, been gentiles of a Protestant background, since that's what everyone here was.
Some of the ideas might have come from people originating from Jewish ethnicity, but there still seems to have been a great fallow ground for those ideas to take root and many activists willing to apply the ideas to a local context in ways that actually made them effective - which makes one question whether it really took the devious Jew to actually come up with the ideas, or if there were material/cultural/technological/historical reasons that would have led to someone coming up with them anyway.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link