SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
No bio...
User ID: 853
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
2d ago
The Democrat administration is/was super hostile to Tech. Making MAGA more libertarian on Tech to get their support wasn't a bad idea. But in exchange the Tech Bros had to not try to flood the country with immigrants but they are going to insist on doing that so this Alliance is breaking before inauguration even begins.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
2d ago
Things continue to escalate, with Musk now Tweeting:
The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B.
Take a big step back and FUCK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend.
Truly at a crossroads. Not sure how Musk comes back from just valuing America as a repository for importing foreigners. Bridge is burned.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
2d ago
We need to import more Indians otherwise Indians won't vote for us. Big reminder to @Hoffmeister for how "model minorities" who commit no crime and cause no terrorism still irrevocably shift politics in a direction against White people.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
2d ago
It's very remarkable, another reminder for how far "DR" has come, it is very well-represented in the most public policy debate since the election. The debate is obviously being followed by Trump and Vance and will most likely have real political implications. What they are remains to be seen. But it's the most I've ever seen the entire timeline dominated by a public policy debate like this.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
2d ago
Borders are meant to provide national security, they aren't meant to be a DEI scheme for those who're already gonna live 99th percentile lives when averaged out over all of humanity.
Borders are absolutely intended to serve the interests of the people represented by the government, and to elevate the interest of those people above foreigners. The gambit of accusing the anti-H1B crowd of "DEI" is rhetorically desperate since it's clearly anti-diversifying the workplace and anti-equitable and anti-inclusive. Yes, you were born abroad so we are going to discriminate against you. If our government does not do that it is illegitimate. And European countries are the only ones in the world that are expected to take the tact you imply here. Is Israel meant to be something other than a "DEI" schema for the Jews?
White American tech workers are not overpaid, it is not their fault that countries like India are totally incapable of generating a civilization that could reciprocate employment opportunity. Instead, you get entitled Indians demanding access to European civilization and pretending it's all about "meritocracy" when their homelands have absolutely nothing to offer Europeans.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
3d ago
Sure, but then the equivalent person who says "I do want to live with you" has just as much weight.
No it doesn't, because it's our country. The person demanding access to someone else's country and community has less weight than the community and country they are trying to access.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
3d ago
White countries are the only ones expected to take in millions of foreigners, regardless of the actual desire of the population of the country, and opposing that is dismissed as "racist" and "stupid." It's not stupid to not want millions of Indians to flood your community and workplace. You can just say "I don't want to live with you" and that is 100% good enough justification.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
4d ago
There are a lot of things about Southern Culture I admire, a lot of things I don't. But it's not feasible or desirable to be hung-up on freezing cultures in time. I'm more interested in the generation of future Culture than I am the preservation of 19th century Culture. This is what differentiates Conservatism from the DR, at least when the DR is at its best.
Southern Culture in particular is tied up with the Lost Cause, I'm not interested in Southern men retaining any sort of identity with a Lost Cause.
I am interested in Holocaust Revisionism because I think deconstructing those myths is important for the generation of future Culture. I'm not interested in the Lost Cause because it leads Southern Men, who have a lot of admirable attributes, to a cul-de-sac.
I'm just curious, if you a Pole went to China and learned the language and such would you say you are Chinese if you had 0% Chinese admixture? Would you say you were Bantu if you took residence in West Africa?
Would you agree the thoroughly Americanized Chinese family, with n-th generation children that can't speak a lick of Mandarin, are more Chinese still than some White person who immigrates there and learns the language?
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
7d ago
That is science fiction; if, when, or how any of that happens does not dismiss the immediate concern of demographic replacement by non-Europeans. There would obviously be huge political pressure regulating how that technology is used. Mate selection is not a deprecated concern, and it's foolish to put all the eggs literally in the basket of "mate selection doesn't matter because gene editing is going to save us."
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
8d ago
They are also themselves largely Spanish, so immigrants with actual Spanish ancestry causing less trouble than purely non-European immigrants is proof of the DR perspective, not the other way around.
I've seen a lot of Indians in the South. I've never seen a culturally Southern Indian. It would probably just make me laugh. It's not them, and they are not us.
But I'll admit that my motivation is not "We must preserve Southern Culture!" My motivation is directing ethnogenesis in a eugenic direction, and I am far more terrified of my descendants being half-Indian (or at least the macro-effect of such an ethnogenesis in aggregate) than I am of Southern Culture going away. I am more concerned with Europe becoming Arab than I am with German culture per se.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
8d ago
Counterpoint: there seems to be a massive backlash to migration in Canada from Indian immigrants, and that is not caused by crime or terrorism by Indian migrants.
What's happening is the European groups, too, take the political playbook from US Conservatives. "We're not racist (that would be evil!) we just think radical Islam is bad mmkaay." But that is downstream of the political pressures of liberal hegemony, there's a practical reason it centers on a religious critique of migration rather than a racial critique of migration.
Remigration strikes a more nativist cord than it does a purely anti-Islamic cord.
The argument people like Keith Woods makes is that these Arab immigrants will never be German, no matter how long they are there or if they learn the language, whether they commit crime or do not commit crime, whatever they Tweet or whatever political policy they support, whatever religion they will follow, the only certainty is that they will never be German. So your rebuttal is not responsive to the issue they fundamentally have with the mass migration of non-European people to European civilization.
It's not just about crime, it's not just about religion, it's not just about terrorism, although those things can be relevant symptoms, it's about jealously guarding a European genetic and civilizational inheritance from being Africanized, replaced by Arabs or Chinese, Indians or whatever.
Your argument is most responsive to the Conservatives who just say "hey, I'm not racist I just oppose mass Arab migration because I don't want terrorist attacks in my Christmas villages." For those people you can do your well ackhually it wasn't Islamic extremism that inspired the attack, but that just doesn't work on the DR perspective.
If Germany let in 100,000 Vietnamese immigrants tomorrow, my prediction is that those immigrants would flourish, as they have in America.
Why stop at 100,000? Why not 100 million? Even if mass migration of Asians, Vietnamese, Chinese to Germany caused a reduction in crime and created economic growth do you think the DR should accept these foreigners because they commit less crime or raise GDP? Why not replace all of Europe with Chinese if it lowered crime and raised IQ? It's only conservatives who say it's about those things.
This terrorist attack is pertinent to the DR perspective because it provides a symbolic counterexample to the lie that, no matter who you are, you can go to Germany, learn the language and obey the law and, congratulations you're German! No you are not. The American Midwest family with Germanic ancestry they don't even know about is more German than they will ever be. So this man ostensibly being the "model" Arab immigrant but still become inspired to commit this act is shattering the liberal illusion of assimilation, or that being German is just an idea.
He really did seem to resent Germany and to want to strike a blow against it on behalf of his in-group, but his in-group isn’t Arabs as a whole, it isn’t Muslims, and it isn’t even Saudis. It appears to just be “ex-Muslim apostates (especially women) fleeing the Middle East.”
His motivation was European immigration policy. You try to be ultra-specific about it to brush it as a one-off, but it introduces the likelihood of violence in response to Right-wing Immigration reform in Europe. We may see more of that type of violence than radical Islamic-inspired violence, although a lot of it will be blended together.
We have seen a similar pattern with Free Speech in Europe: terrorist attacks in response to offensive speech did not motivate backlash against mass migration it motivated crackdowns on "hate speech" out of fear of offending Muslims. So if we see more Arab terrorists attack Europe because of European immigration reform we will likely see pressure put against immigration reform. This is relevant especially at a time when parties are flirting with the idea of remigration.
You don't think that AfD and other European parties beginning to support remigration is likely to inspire any more of this violence? We already see race riots and organized street violence by African and Arab gangs. That already happens, and it's political, it's not driven by radical Islam. So your denial that we won't see more of this sort of political violence is absurd.
Yes, the likelihood is near 100% that this sort of violence is going to influence European policy on immigration, most likely it will cause authorities to crackdown harder on political support for remigration because authorities will plausibly be able to say that supporting this policy is likely to foment violence. Certainly if that policy were to be pursued, then violence from deportees would be a top concern of that policy. So there's simply no reality in which the prospect of violence from these African and Arab migrants is irrelevant, Muslim or otherwise.
This attack is more relevant because it was motivated by European immigration policy than if it were just radical Islam. It's proof that mass migration irrevocably influences politics and "assimilation" is fundamentally a lie.
on the other hand, his support for the AfD and his criticism of Muslim immigration makes him pretty much impossible to use as a cudgel by the right wing.
You really have to be kidding? The Right Wing argument is that he does not belong in Europe, no matter if he's a doctor or what he tweets, in a box or with a fox, not here or there, not anywhere in Europe. That argument can and should be used as a cudgel by the right wing, at least the Right Wing who acknowledges that this is about race and not merely about religion. The people who can't use this as a cudgel are those who pretend that this is just about Islam, and mass Arab migration to Europe would be fine if they just weren't Muslim. Is that an argument you accept Hoffmeister?
"Arabs don't belong in Europe." "But this Arab who slaughtered a bunch of Europeans tweeted pro-Israel stuff!" How could you think that's responsive at all to the argument?
How does a refugee slaughtering a bunch of people in a Christmas market not validate the anti-refugee political perspective? Because the refugee wasn't Muslim? That is just ridiculous.
Keith Woods is correct, and the Right Wing who pretends that mass migration from the third world is only a problem because of religious incompatibility do not form the ranks of the DR, and people like Woods have long made the argument that it's about race and not about religion.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
9d ago
ADL has ramped up on doxxing X accounts. Not even their usual profiling of right-wing public figures, but literally "this is an X account with a lot of followers who says antisemitic things, this is the real identity of that person." For some reason ADL isn't banned for doing this.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
9d ago
The "risk profile" lol. Yes, there are advocacy groups behind the scenes putting pressure and maybe even making threats if these institutions don't follow along. The point being, his insinuation that Nick is "allowed to continue talking about what is ostensibly the most incendiary third rail of American politics" without noting that he is banned from nearly every single Social Media platform except Rumble and X (only recently and due to Musk acquiring X and unbanning him), and he's literally banned from banking and engaging in electronic transactions in USD.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
10d ago
Isn't this exactly what Fuentes accuses Jews of doing?
Fuentes has always done an "Hey I'm an Afro-Latino bit." Denying he's a "White Supremacist" is understandable, it's just a slur. It's like if the officer were to ask "are you a heretic?"
He's allowed to continue talking about what is ostensibly the most incendiary third rail of American politics - the "Jewish question"
He is literally banned from banking. He's not allowed to have a bank account. He's also banned from all credit card and payment processors so he can't even make money selling merchandise like hats. He can only take donations through crypto. Despite never having been convicted of a crime, he's debanked. You do realize even violent criminals are allowed to have bank accounts and process credit card transactions to sell merchandise? He isn't.
How does one get debanked like that without massive, backdoor coordination of influential people?
He was also put temporarily on the No Fly List, although the circumstances of that are disputable since the process is not transparent. He had some crypto that somebody donated to him seized from the government. As mentioned, he's not even able to sell hats because every time he tries to establish a payment processors he gets banned.
There is maximum pressure put onto him, really the whole debanking thing shouldn't even be legal in the first place. It's a novel way to get around the First Amendment by financially ruining somebody for their speech using the power of a heavily regulated industry.
Isn't this exactly what Fuentes accuses Jews of doing?
No, it's not at all what Fuentes accuses Jews of doing. Fuentes accuses Jews of presenting as White to levy criticisms of White people or otherwise low-key advocate for Jewish interests. This is a distinctly Jewish behavior. There are no White people who put on a super Jewish aesthetic and present as Jewish to talk to "fellow Jewish people" while actually promoting White interests and criticizing Jews. That doesn't happen and it's not what's happening here, Nick is just invoking his heritage to discredit the accusation of heresy ("White Supremacy").
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
10d ago
Why do you think he's a fed? I hear people say this, but they only point to the fact he wasn't charged for J6 even though he never went near or inside the Capitol Building so it's a much different case than all the trespassers who got charged. Not strong evidence at all IMO.
Nick posted video from his front porch confirming he was targeted by the killer, who called him by name. He tried opening the door but it was locked.
Nick was also charged recently for pepper spraying some liberal woman who rang his doorbell to confront him about his "Your body my choice" joke, which has some 100 million views now on X.
Would this incident help aid in his defense that he was afraid for his life? I don't think so although it would be a contributing factor to sentencing.
But that is what the AJC is claiming and that is what I am responding to my OP you have quoted here. The AJC has accused him of Holocaust Revisionism based on his praise for Calin Geogescu. I have asked you and @Amadan to explain how that is Holocaust Revisionism. You continue to refuse to do so, except for just saying "it's definitely Holocaust Revisionism." How?
I'm a Holocaust Revisionist, so I know it when I see it! I want you to explain to me why Calin Geogescu praising Ion Antonescu as a national hero is Holocaust Revisionism. Don't just say it is, make a simple argument for why that statement is true.
You just openly and shamelessly do this double-speak and then freeze up when asked to lay out clearly why what you are saying is true. And then you accuse me of dishonesty.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
21d ago
Oh it's the businesspeople of course. I think "pro-EU elites" is getting closer and that is certainly part of it.
Do you admit that one of the main reasons for consternation over European Nationalism and growth of right-wing parties is anti-semitism among the "pro-EU elites?" Do you not believe them when they essentially outright say "we can't have a right wing because of the Holocaust?"
What's so amazing is that you don't even take the "pro-EU elites" at their own word that they are very concerned about anti-semitism, or at least that is an excuse they use to clamp down on those parties with increasingly anti-democratic measures. You don't even believe them when they say it directly.
SecureSignals
Civilization is simply a geno-memetic-techno-capital machine
21d ago
this was answered, you are doing your usual dance again of wasting time of others...
This was not answered at all. How is a Romanian Nationalist praising a Romanian Nationalist Leader "Holocaust Revisionism"? There is a correct answer to this, but you have certainly not given any answer at all.
The Biden Administration has been very hostile to Musk, with even MSM onlookers admitting there's political motivation behind the regulatory scrutiny. This was even before Musk went Republican.
California is hostile to tech/business in general, so Musk pulled out a lot of stuff from California.
Harris was proposing some tech unfriendly stuff as well like taxing unrealized capital gains.
It was a good opportunity for Republicans to gain support by opposing the tech unfriendly Democrat policies, but if Musk is going to draw a line in the sand at H1B then the alliance is not going to last long.
More options
Context Copy link