This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Agreed. We seem to somehow be undergoing reverse Conquest's second law...
I suggest we call it "Scott's Law of Witches" after this post. The outgroup refer to it as the "Nazi Bar Problem" but we don't want to promote "Nazi" as an epithet for right-wing views in the large gap between Mitt Romney and the actual NSDAP.
As far as I can tell, the motte is mostly pro-HBD and anti-equal protection laws. That makes us at least fellow travelers to what Nazi means in practice.
I think that a majority of mottians might agree with Scott Alexander that it is likely that the Ashkenazi Jews have some genetic intelligence advantage compared to most other ethnic groups.
"Pro-HBD" seems a weird term to describe that, it makes it sound like people pick their beliefs to signal group membership instead of what they perceive to be true. Like they are fanboys of some sports team.
I believe that the surface gravity on Earth is roughly 9.8m/s^2. I don't like this fact, and think it would be amazing if earth was less dense and had only 2 m/s^2 surface gravity. I would thus be annoyed to be called "pro-gravity".
My relationship to HBD is similar, except that I believe it to be more of a minor quirk than a driving force of history. What we should do about it is that we should try very hard to identify the relevant genes and then CRISPR the hell out of the next generation.
"anti-equal protection laws" can mean many different things. I am broadly for colorblindness and meritocracy, which means I am broadly against affirmative action.
To the degree that the state makes it hard to fire employees for stuff, I think it is probably more consistent to add ethnicity to other criteria like sex/gender, sexual orientation or even political leanings.
Being treated equally for these things by the state is non-negotiable. There might be a few mottians dreaming of turning the US into a "white ethnostate", and I don't particularly object to calling them fellow travelers of the Nazis, but I would be surprised to learn that it is a majority of them. "We should not hand out driving licences / passports / concealed carry licences / permissions to have kids to Males / Republicans / Lesbians / Blacks" sounds fucking un-American to my European ears.
I think one effect is that people with moderate opinions are much less likely to comment on a thread than people with strong opinions. People who argue about gender until the comment depth reaches 20 are likely either feminists or men's rights people. People who argue about class relations ad nauseam are likely to be Marxists. People who thrive on HBD discussions are more likely to be (prescriptive) racists than people who thrive on discussions about economics are.
Earth would have had no air, then.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Any organization that is structurally committed to letting rightists speak freely (such as this forum) is, in some sense, already an explicitly rightist organization, and would therefore be exempt from Conquest’s second law.
I miss when Free Speech was a heavily left-wing-coded principle. I expected more right-wingers to start adopting it as they realized they were losing control of the culture and could no longer be confident of not getting the short end of the stick, but I was way too naive about how many left-wingers I expected to avoid doing the opposite.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link