This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
A lot of people are saying that Google's engineers must be pretty stupid not to have noticed this before release.
What if they aren't? What if they did this on purpose?
I propose a Straussian reading of this whole affair. Google engineers who have a problem with wokeness can't speak out against it. The only acceptable criticism is the 50-Stalins criticism, that we haven't gone far enough, that we need more wokeness. So I think this is a 50-Stalins-style protest. I think it's a deliberate act of accelerationism to highlight the absurdity of trying to apply this style of heavy handed censorship to AI.
I think Google's engineers are protesting their leadership by giving them exactly what they asked for, and everything that comes with it.
I suspect this is not the case, and that everyone involved in this project was all-in on wokeness. They didn't see a problem because to them, this is not a problem. This was likely some woke AI group going off on their own, intended to produce a product for the glory of their PM, which would then be forgotten after the PM got a promotion as so many other Google products have been. Then Google higher-ups realized Microsoft/OpenAI had stolen a march on them, so they had to release. If they allowed this thing to be seen internally first (and it's quite likely they did not), they likely deflected all criticism with threats and admonitions about how the team worked hard on it so don't criticize. The higher ups either didn't pay attention or (just as likely) were fully on-board with the wokeness. Then release, to a world that's still a half-a-step behind their vanguard. Oops.
To me the most plausible claim you make is that all is all internal feedback would have been deflected. (I'd also give you the claim that all would have been forgotten after the PM got a promotion, except that unfortunately for then the promo cycle is a lot slower than the media cycle...)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link