This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I’m going to leave your arguments about scientific practice and appeals to authority to someone else, and note that nearly everything you write about population history is wrong.
No, not every human alive is descended from every other human alive 7,000 years ago. Humans had already dispersed by then; I’m probably a descendant of every western hunter gatherer and early European farmer and yamnaya on the landscape 7,000 ya, but of no sub Saharan Africans or aboriginal Australians from after the ice age. And your statement about genetic diversity in Africa is also not true; technically speaking, pygmies and Khoisan are farther from any other human population than any other human population is from any other population… but the vast majority of sub Saharan Africans are descended from early Niger-Congo speakers, who are an identifiable genetic cluster like eg Europeans or orientals.
Even leaving out the San, Pygmies, etc, subsaharan africans do have greater genetic diversity than non-africans—their bottleneck was smaller than the out-of-africa group's, if I remember correctly.
I'm not sure what the Bantu expansion looks like genetically.
But I don't think this means that you can't model them as a group, at least when we're in the context of talking about group representation and affirmative action. It's not like other groups aren't composed of a bunch of smaller groups that also vary (elites vs. commoners, if nothing else).
And yes, the 7000 years point is obviously wrong—very few people today outside of the Americas would be descended from the average native american 7000 years ago. It's also irrelevant.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link