This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
BAP is a jewish nationalist who preaches individualism for the goys. His goal is to turn the west into a free market with free movement of people and goods.
The other side are white nationalists who want to preserve European civilization.
BAP would probably not want to see Tel Aviv turned into an Atlanta full of Africans. Diversity for the goyim, nationalism for the jews. Similar to Ben Shapiro who thinks identity politics is lame unless it is for Israel.
I wish it was more nuanced than this, but this an accurate heuristic. there is a sort of irony in seeing an American with a Star of David flag and/or Ukraine flag on twitter username accuse someone with a Palestine flag of being anti-American.
More options
Context Copy link
The wicked Jewish badwronger vs the righteous good-doer white nationalist.
This is just cheerleading for white nationalism while dunking on the perfidious Jew. Truly content-free other than a big sneer.
No, it points to a bigger trend: nationalism for me, open borders for thee. Ben Shapiro thinks white nationalism is lame while being a hard core zionist. He doesn't actually think identity politics is lame, he just opposes all identity politics instead of his own.
So do and so are most white gentile American conservatives - tens of millions of them - what’s your point?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Most of Alamariu's recent writing on Israel has been strongly negative other than in that he said that Hamas weren't 'bronze age' because they whine to the international community about getting bombed when Israel fights back...which doesn't seem out of line with the rest of his beliefs. The main 'allegation' surrounding his supposed Zionism is that he wore an IDF t-shirt to his college classes to annoy leftist students 20 years ago. That seems pretty embarrassing but I don't think it tells us much.
The other side are wignats like Woods who spend their days crying about Palestinians on Twitter and unironically resharing Finkelstein-type comments about how oppressed they are, which BAP correctly said isn't a very compelling message to most Western conservatives who consider leftist activists, Muslim immigrants and progressives (the rest of the anti-Israel coalition in Western countries) their political foes, not friends.
It is probably different in the US, but in Europe Israel is deeply unpopular among a large part of the right. Israel and the neocons make war, Europe gets flooded with migrants. Borrowing trillions to bomb the middle east, destroy the last of the remnants of the Greek culture in the region, flood Europe with migrants and force feminism on the middle east wasn't popular here. The Palestinians want Palestinians to stay in Palestine, Israel wants a massive refugee crisis on Europe's doorstep.
Israel, apart from having the largest gay parade in the middle east, has worked to destabilize neighbouring countries, finance jihadist groups in Syria and push migrants into Europe. The Israel lobby has been vocally pro diversity, wars in the middle east and immigration. The ADL wasn't exactly on the white nationalist coalition's side. Trying to build a coalition between European nationalists and Israelis is borderline impossible as the two groups have completely different goals. Europeans want Palestinians to stay in Palestine and the middle east to have stable states. Israel wants mass migration from the middle east and a weak Syria/Iraq/lebanon.
As for the Palestinians being weak, they have showed impressive fighting spirit.
In office most European nationalists (eg. Orban) seem to have fine working relationships with Israel. Israel doesn't want Gazans to go to Europe, they just don't want them in Gaza, and are happy to deliver them to anyone who will have them.
In general I don't think it's an important question - outside Britain, France and Russia (in the second, the most prominent nationalist figure is Jewish after Marine Le Pen moved to the center-right, and in the third Putin is quite close with a number of Jews in his inner circle) there are very few Jews in Europe and most will leave quickly to the US or Israel as the Muslim population grows further and attacks on synagogues, Jewish schools and so on increase. There will be very few European Jews left to play any substantial role in the coming cultural conflict between indigenous Europeans and migrant populations from the Islamic world, and many of those who remain will either be politically irrelevant ultra-Orthodox or on the right like Zemmour.
Orban is already sanctioned. He has a small land locked country under immense pressure from abroad. He is forced to make some concessions in order to not end up getting the Belarus treatment.
The reality has been that Israel has pushed hard against Syria and we got flooded with migrants. Pushing millions of migrants into another part of the Middle east is destabilizing and greatly increases the risk of them comming hear.
Ben Gvir, an Israeli minister, is openly talking about creating a mega-refugee crisis on Europe's doorstep: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/ben-gvir-war-an-opportunity-to-encourage-migration-from-gaza/
After decades of Israel Palestine conflict, it is clear that the result has been more migrants to Europe.
So far the Jewish population of Europe has been overwhelmingly pro open borders and diversity. For such a small group, they have been incredibly overrepresented in promoting mass immigration.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link